Judge rules Trump executive order targeting law firm Perkins Coie is unconstitutional

[C_Clayton_Jones]

‘A federal judge ruled Friday that President Trump's executive order targeting the law firm Perkins Coie is unconstitutional and permanently blocked the administration from enforcing it.

In a 102-page decision, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell ruled in favor of the firm and said Mr. Trump's directive that sought to punish it sent the message that "lawyers must stick to the party line, or else."

"Using the powers of the federal government to target lawyers for their representation of clients and avowed progressive employment policies in an overt attempt to suppress and punish certain viewpoints, however, is contrary to the Constitution, which requires that the government respond to dissenting or unpopular speech or ideas with 'tolerance, not coercion,'" Howell wrote.

She found that the executive order violates the First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments to the Constitution.’

Judge rules Trump executive order targeting law firm Perkins Coie is unconstitutional

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell found the executive order targeting Perkins Coie violates First, Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

www.cbsnews.com

Very good.

The Trump regime’s lawless attacks on perceived political enemies is classic fascist authoritarianism.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Nothing like a nobody judge with no votes stopping a president with 78 million votes.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Good news.

 

[ThisIsMe]

‘A federal judge ruled Friday that President Trump's executive order targeting the law firm Perkins Coie is unconstitutional and permanently blocked the administration from enforcing it.

In a 102-page decision, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell ruled in favor of the firm and said Mr. Trump's directive that sought to punish it sent the message that "lawyers must stick to the party line, or else."

"Using the powers of the federal government to target lawyers for their representation of clients and avowed progressive employment policies in an overt attempt to suppress and punish certain viewpoints, however, is contrary to the Constitution, which requires that the government respond to dissenting or unpopular speech or ideas with 'tolerance, not coercion,'" Howell wrote.

She found that the executive order violates the First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments to the Constitution.’

Judge rules Trump executive order targeting law firm Perkins Coie is unconstitutional

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell found the executive order targeting Perkins Coie violates First, Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

www.cbsnews.com

Very good.

The Trump regime’s lawless attacks on perceived political enemies is classic fascist authoritarianism.

As far as who has to have security clearances..no public entity has a right to a security clearance....they can and are routinely revoked.

As far as their activities in regards to the trump campaign, he just needs to sick the DOJ on them and leave no stone unturned.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

As far as who has to have security clearances..no public entity has a right to a security clearance....they can and are routinely revoked.

As far as their activities in regards to the trump campaign, he just needs to sick the DOJ on them and leave no stone unturned.

As far as what you think, the Judge makes the rules. You follow them.

 

[Rawley]

In a 102-page decision, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell

LOL

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

LOL

Judge Howell is laughing at Trump.

 

[Marener]

Nothing like a nobody judge with no votes stopping a president with 78 million votes.

Doesn’t matter if he got 178 million votes. You can’t violate people’s rights.

You want a republic, don’t you?

 

[1srelluc]

Obama "judge".

Still there is nothing that says the US government has to have anything further to do with them.

 

[MarcATL]

Just about everything Trump is doing is unconstitutional.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Judicial activism must be stopped. Remove these judges.

 

[ThisIsMe]

As far as what you think, the Judge makes the rules. You follow them.

Judges don't have the right to deem that a private company is entitled to a security clearance. Only the government can do that, and lawyers typically do not retain a permanent security clearance. Seems like they only have them on a case by case basis and only those working with sensitive materials.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Judges don't have the right to deem that a private company is entitled to a security clearance. Only the government can do that, and lawyers typically do not retain a permanent security clearance. Seems like they only have them on a case by case basis and only those working with sensitive materials.

Of course they do. Congress makes the law, and the judiciary adjudicates it.

That you don't like it is immaterial.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Of course they do. Congress makes the law, and the judiciary adjudicates it.

That you don't like it is immaterial.

Yeah, but then judges have made all kinds of rulings that president's have ignored. Why make a fuss about this one?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Yeah, but then judges have made all kinds of rulings that president's have ignored. Why make a fuss about this one?

Give me 15 examples in the history of the nation.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Give me 15 examples in the history of the nation.

Lol; "15 examples". My statement was called sarcasm. I'm talking about biden...Just biden lol

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Lol; "15 examples". My statement was called sarcasm. I'm talking about biden...Just biden lol

See, you can't do it, not even Biden.

 

[Hellokitty]

As far as what you think, the Judge makes the rules. You follow them.

But TRUMP's a dictator, so...

 

[ThisIsMe]

See, you can't do it, not even Biden.

.of course I can lol, I'm talking about his student loan forgiveness......

.....

......

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

But TRUMP's a dictator, so...

Let's see if he ignores them. If not, then he is a wannabee dictator, which you want.