Judge upholds jury’s $7.8M verdict against BART in COVID vaccine mandate case

[Rigby5]

{...
A federal judge on Monday blocked Bay Area Rapid Transit’s attempt to toss out a jury verdict that found the transit agency discriminated against six former employees who sought religious exemptions to its COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

In October, a jury determined that BART owed $7.8 million in damages to the six ex-employees, who were fired or forced into retirement after declining the vaccine, according to court documents. The transit agency tried to overturn the verdict, but the motion was denied.
...}

MSN

Glad to hear the courts verified that the covid mandates were illegal.
Not only are vaccinations very personal medical treatment, but the mRNA vax was no tested, FDA approved, effective, or safe.

 

[Waffle SS]

Good, but also bad because the taxpayers foot the bill. A better solution: eliminate nonsense public transportation. This is 2025, not 1925. Stop living in the past.

 

[gipper]

Good, but also bad because the taxpayers foot the bill. A better solution: eliminate nonsense public transportation. This is 2025, not 1925. Stop living in the past.

No. A better solution is terminating all the senior management of BART.

 

[Waffle SS]

No. A better solution is terminating all the senior management of BART.

Oh, I'm sure no one will take their incompetent place!

 

[EMH]

No. A better solution is terminating all the senior management of BART.

Love the word TERMINATING because all who mandated Murderous FRAUD Vax deserve to be TERMINATED.

 

[gipper]

Oh, I'm sure no one will take their incompetent place!

What’s with the Nazi screen name?

 

[Waffle SS]

What’s with the Nazi screen name?

um, wut?

 

[gipper]

um, wut?

Is it supposed to be Waffen SS? Just asking for an explanation.

 

[berg80]

Glad to hear the courts verified that the covid mandates were illegal.

They didn't. The court found BART should have accommodated the wishes of the employees who believe the cloud fairy doesn't want them to take a potentially life saving vaccine.

In an earlier verdict in the case, jurors found that BART had failed to show that accommodating the former employees’ religious exemptions would pose an “undue hardship” to the agency.

https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/judge-upholds-jury-s-7-8m-verdict-bart-covid-20009397.php