Judicial Watch and New York City Settle Federal Lawsuit on Voter Registration Clean-Up after City Removes 441,083 Ineligible Names from Voter Rolls

Drop Dead Fred

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2020
1,070
2,344
1,928
Why are Democrats against removing dead people from the voter rolls?

Why was this lawsuit necessary?

New York City deliberately kept 441,083 people on the voter rolls even though they had died or moved away. A lawsuit forced them to obey the law, and remove their names.

Before the lawsuit, only 22 names had been removed during a period of six years.

I agree with this lawsuit. I agree with removing the names of people who died or moved away.


Judicial Watch and New York City Settle Federal Lawsuit on Voter Registration Clean-Up after City Removes 441,083 Ineligible Names from Voter Rolls

December 28, 2022

Judicial Watch announced today that it is settling a federal election integrity lawsuit against New York City after the city removed 441,083 ineligible names from the voter rolls and promised to take reasonable steps going forward to clean its voter registration lists

Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in July against New York City after it failed to clean voter rolls for years. The lawsuit, filed under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), pointed out that New York City removed only 22 names under the federal law over six years (Judicial Watch v Valentine et al. (No.1:22-cv-03952)).

The Judicial Watch lawsuit detailed that New York City’s “own recent data concedes that there were only 22 total” removals under this provision “during a six-year period, in a city of over 5.5 million voters. These are ludicrously small numbers of removals given the sizable populations of these counties.” Moreover, the “almost complete failure of Kings, Queens, New York, Bronx, and Richmond Counties, over a period of at least six years, to remove voters” under a key provision of federal law “means that there are untold numbers of New York City registrations for voters who are ineligible to vote at their listed address because they have changed residence or are otherwise ineligible to vote.”
 
Looks like Judicial Watch has successfully "SUPPRESSED" over 400,000 phony votes for Democrats. :113:
Well if believing that nonsense makes you feel better, go for it.
 
Last edited:
Why are Democrats against removing dead people from the voter rolls?

Why was this lawsuit necessary?

New York City deliberately kept 441,083 people on the voter rolls even though they had died or moved away. A lawsuit forced them to obey the law, and remove their names.

Before the lawsuit, only 22 names had been removed during a period of six years.

I agree with this lawsuit. I agree with removing the names of people who died or moved away.


Judicial Watch and New York City Settle Federal Lawsuit on Voter Registration Clean-Up after City Removes 441,083 Ineligible Names from Voter Rolls

December 28, 2022

Judicial Watch announced today that it is settling a federal election integrity lawsuit against New York City after the city removed 441,083 ineligible names from the voter rolls and promised to take reasonable steps going forward to clean its voter registration lists

Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in July against New York City after it failed to clean voter rolls for years. The lawsuit, filed under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), pointed out that New York City removed only 22 names under the federal law over six years (Judicial Watch v Valentine et al. (No.1:22-cv-03952)).

The Judicial Watch lawsuit detailed that New York City’s “own recent data concedes that there were only 22 total” removals under this provision “during a six-year period, in a city of over 5.5 million voters. These are ludicrously small numbers of removals given the sizable populations of these counties.” Moreover, the “almost complete failure of Kings, Queens, New York, Bronx, and Richmond Counties, over a period of at least six years, to remove voters” under a key provision of federal law “means that there are untold numbers of New York City registrations for voters who are ineligible to vote at their listed address because they have changed residence or are otherwise ineligible to vote.”
Yet looking at voter rolls, those dead people were not voting.

This is like Trump's peace deals between nations not at war with each other.
 
Because many of those being removes are not dead. Many voters who have been removed are claiming that they ARE eligible and were wrongfully removed. Many voters who were removed who are alive are not being told exactly why they were removed.
 
Several dem states send out mail-in ballots to all registered voters, and then "harvest" them.

Not sure if NY does that.

If you know a dead person is registered you can vote in their name, duh.
 
All NYC did was house clean the voter registration rolls. It is telling Judicial Watch did not find a single fraudulent vote. You never would have heard the end of it if they had.
 
Why are Democrats against removing dead people from the voter rolls?

Why was this lawsuit necessary?

New York City deliberately kept 441,083 people on the voter rolls even though they had died or moved away. A lawsuit forced them to obey the law, and remove their names.

Before the lawsuit, only 22 names had been removed during a period of six years.

I agree with this lawsuit. I agree with removing the names of people who died or moved away.


Judicial Watch and New York City Settle Federal Lawsuit on Voter Registration Clean-Up after City Removes 441,083 Ineligible Names from Voter Rolls

December 28, 2022

Judicial Watch announced today that it is settling a federal election integrity lawsuit against New York City after the city removed 441,083 ineligible names from the voter rolls and promised to take reasonable steps going forward to clean its voter registration lists

Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in July against New York City after it failed to clean voter rolls for years. The lawsuit, filed under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), pointed out that New York City removed only 22 names under the federal law over six years (Judicial Watch v Valentine et al. (No.1:22-cv-03952)).

The Judicial Watch lawsuit detailed that New York City’s “own recent data concedes that there were only 22 total” removals under this provision “during a six-year period, in a city of over 5.5 million voters. These are ludicrously small numbers of removals given the sizable populations of these counties.” Moreover, the “almost complete failure of Kings, Queens, New York, Bronx, and Richmond Counties, over a period of at least six years, to remove voters” under a key provision of federal law “means that there are untold numbers of New York City registrations for voters who are ineligible to vote at their listed address because they have changed residence or are otherwise ineligible to vote.”
Because the demrats and some Republicans can't stand straight up elections.
 
Because the demrats and some Republicans can't stand straight up elections.

All 50 states periodically purge their voter rolls by law.

 
Why are Democrats against removing dead people from the voter rolls?

Why was this lawsuit necessary?

New York City deliberately kept 441,083 people on the voter rolls even though they had died or moved away. A lawsuit forced them to obey the law, and remove their names.

Before the lawsuit, only 22 names had been removed during a period of six years.

I agree with this lawsuit. I agree with removing the names of people who died or moved away.


Judicial Watch and New York City Settle Federal Lawsuit on Voter Registration Clean-Up after City Removes 441,083 Ineligible Names from Voter Rolls

December 28, 2022

Judicial Watch announced today that it is settling a federal election integrity lawsuit against New York City after the city removed 441,083 ineligible names from the voter rolls and promised to take reasonable steps going forward to clean its voter registration lists

Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in July against New York City after it failed to clean voter rolls for years. The lawsuit, filed under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), pointed out that New York City removed only 22 names under the federal law over six years (Judicial Watch v Valentine et al. (No.1:22-cv-03952)).

The Judicial Watch lawsuit detailed that New York City’s “own recent data concedes that there were only 22 total” removals under this provision “during a six-year period, in a city of over 5.5 million voters. These are ludicrously small numbers of removals given the sizable populations of these counties.” Moreover, the “almost complete failure of Kings, Queens, New York, Bronx, and Richmond Counties, over a period of at least six years, to remove voters” under a key provision of federal law “means that there are untold numbers of New York City registrations for voters who are ineligible to vote at their listed address because they have changed residence or are otherwise ineligible to vote.”

Periodically states purge their voter rolls for dead people, people who have moved away or haven't voted in Three election cycles. Judicial Watch is always a loser.
 
Why are Democrats against removing dead people from the voter rolls?

Why was this lawsuit necessary?

New York City deliberately kept 441,083 people on the voter rolls even though they had died or moved away. A lawsuit forced them to obey the law, and remove their names.

Before the lawsuit, only 22 names had been removed during a period of six years.

I agree with this lawsuit. I agree with removing the names of people who died or moved away.


Judicial Watch and New York City Settle Federal Lawsuit on Voter Registration Clean-Up after City Removes 441,083 Ineligible Names from Voter Rolls

December 28, 2022

Judicial Watch announced today that it is settling a federal election integrity lawsuit against New York City after the city removed 441,083 ineligible names from the voter rolls and promised to take reasonable steps going forward to clean its voter registration lists

Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in July against New York City after it failed to clean voter rolls for years. The lawsuit, filed under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), pointed out that New York City removed only 22 names under the federal law over six years (Judicial Watch v Valentine et al. (No.1:22-cv-03952)).

The Judicial Watch lawsuit detailed that New York City’s “own recent data concedes that there were only 22 total” removals under this provision “during a six-year period, in a city of over 5.5 million voters. These are ludicrously small numbers of removals given the sizable populations of these counties.” Moreover, the “almost complete failure of Kings, Queens, New York, Bronx, and Richmond Counties, over a period of at least six years, to remove voters” under a key provision of federal law “means that there are untold numbers of New York City registrations for voters who are ineligible to vote at their listed address because they have changed residence or are otherwise ineligible to vote.”

Judicial Watch (JW) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit[1] American conservative activist group[2] that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials. Founded in 1994, Judicial Watch has primarily targeted Democrats, in particular the administrations of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, as well as Hillary Clinton's role in them. It was founded by attorney Larry Klayman, and has been led by Tom Fitton since 2003.
 
All NYC did was house clean the voter registration rolls. It is telling Judicial Watch did not find a single fraudulent vote. You never would have heard the end of it if they had.
How do you find evidence of fraudulent votes after the fact?
 
All 50 states periodically purge their voter rolls by law.

If that's true, why all the lawsuits forcing them to follow the law?
 

Forum List

Back
Top