Town Journal. (1940). v 47. Pathfinder. United States: Farm Journal, Incorporated, pp. 3,4,12.

March 16, 1940:

ARMIES IN THE NEAR EAST - A Possible Locale for Act II in the War


...Four Classification


The countries which make up this possible theater of war divide up into these classifications: (1) the Allies' friend (Turkey); (2) French - controlled (Syria); (3) British - owned or dominated (Palestine, Transjordan, Egypt, Iraq, and such small states as Aden, Oman, Hadramaut); and (4) the independents (Saudi Arabia, Iran).


Turkey lives in two worlds. A European power, though only a fraction of her 294,416 square miles are in Europe, she is a leader in the Balkan Entente. But Turkey also is Near Eastern, having a non-aggression pact with Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan - all possible points of German-Russian attack. In the First World War, Turkey was on Germany's side . But in the current war, it has leaned strongly to the Allied side, calling itself "not neutral, but only non-belligerent for the moment."
Bordering on Russia, it controls the entrance to the Black Sea, and has a tough, well-trained army of 350,000 which can be expanded over- lnight to a million men.
Just as in the Balkans, Turkey is a key power in the Near East, allied militarily with France and Britain.


The rest of the Near Eastern line - up follows:


• French Mandated Syria was once part of the Ittoms Enpire, grabbed by France as a spoils of the last war. The whole area is run by a French commisioner and the French Army. Stationed in it are from 275,000 to 300,000 men under command of General Weygand, former commissioner.


...Troubled Palestine.


• British - Mandated Palestine and Transjordan, likewise former parts of the Ottoman Empire, are contrasts. Transjordan gives the British so little trouble that its 34,740 square desert miles are policed by less than 1,600 men.
Palestine, on the other hand, in its 10,492 square miles (slightly larger than Vermont) packs more concentrated hatred than any other section of the Near East. This hatred exists between the Arabs and Jews and springs from a deep-rooted dispute as to which group has first claim on the region as a home land. The Arabs, who are Semitic themselves but who hate the Jews for their prosperity and who fear they would dominate any Palestine self-government, rise sporadically against them.


Palestine's Arabs admire Hitler for his Jew - baiting. In event of war on the Near Eastern Front, Arab uprisings could be embarrassing. To ease the situation, Britain last October halted Jewish immigration to Palestine , which is still run by a British commissioner. Two
weeks ago Britain forbade the sale of any more Arab land to the Jews.

1000002672.jpg



===

Hitler's Reference To Palestine Excites Arabs. - Page 1
Lawrence Journal-World · ‎ Sep 13, 1938.
Arab reaction today to Adolf Hitler's references to Palestine foreshadowed increased resistance in this troubled British mandate. "Now we are not without friends in Europe," an Arab spokesman said. "Our ultimate success as a nation lies In the hands of Hitler and Mussolini and not in Britain and France."
This was one response to Hitler's assertion at Nurnberg yesterday that "poor Arabs aro defenseless and left in the lurch."
1000002685.jpg
 
Last edited:
West Germany Is Conquering Middle East With Salesmen; Nazi Past No Hindrance.
By Anne Frang

Toledo Blade · ‎ Feb 27, 1960 · ‎ (p. 8)
... German goods) and thereby more than canceled out Greek resentments. Ironically, the legacy of the Nazi era is an asset to the new Germany in the Middle East. Many Arabs admire Nazi anti-Semitism. "Heil Hitler" is a common salutation to German businessmen, who have learned to accept it as an intended courtesy.
 
Wait, is this an argument that the Jewish people
should have accepted to be, at best, residents
in a reservation under the Arab yoke?

Jews were turned away everywhere except Palestine. Big mistake. The European Zionists always intended to forcibly remove the Palestinians. Read Theodore Herzl's journals. The Jews formed their terror gangs as early as 1920... Long before Hitler.
 
Town Journal. (1940). v 47. Pathfinder. United States: Farm Journal, Incorporated, pp. 3,4,12.

March 16, 1940:

ARMIES IN THE NEAR EAST - A Possible Locale for Act II in the War


...Four Classification


The countries which make up this possible theater of war divide up into these classifications: (1) the Allies' friend (Turkey); (2) French - controlled (Syria); (3) British - owned or dominated (Palestine, Transjordan, Egypt, Iraq, and such small states as Aden, Oman, Hadramaut); and (4) the independents (Saudi Arabia, Iran).


Turkey lives in two worlds. A European power, though only a fraction of her 294,416 square miles are in Europe, she is a leader in the Balkan Entente. But Turkey also is Near Eastern, having a non-aggression pact with Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan - all possible points of German-Russian attack. In the First World War, Turkey was on Germany's side . But in the current war, it has leaned strongly to the Allied side, calling itself "not neutral, but only non-belligerent for the moment."
Bordering on Russia, it controls the entrance to the Black Sea, and has a tough, well-trained army of 350,000 which can be expanded over- lnight to a million men.
Just as in the Balkans, Turkey is a key power in the Near East, allied militarily with France and Britain.


The rest of the Near Eastern line - up follows:


• French Mandated Syria was once part of the Ittoms Enpire, grabbed by France as a spoils of the last war. The whole area is run by a French commisioner and the French Army. Stationed in it are from 275,000 to 300,000 men under command of General Weygand, former commissioner.


...Troubled Palestine.


• British - Mandated Palestine and Transjordan, likewise former parts of the Ottoman Empire, are contrasts. Transjordan gives the British so little trouble that its 34,740 square desert miles are policed by less than 1,600 men.
Palestine, on the other hand, in its 10,492 square miles (slightly larger than Vermont) packs more concentrated hatred than any other section of the Near East. This hatred exists between the Arabs and Jews and springs from a deep-rooted dispute as to which group has first claim on the region as a home land. The Arabs, who are Semitic themselves but who hate the Jews for their prosperity and who fear they would dominate any Palestine self-government, rise sporadically against them.


Palestine's Arabs admire Hitler for his Jew - baiting. In event of war on the Near Eastern Front, Arab uprisings could be embarrassing. To ease the situation, Britain last October halted Jewish immigration to Palestine , which is still run by a British commissioner. Two
weeks ago Britain forbade the sale of any more Arab land to the Jews.

View attachment 908137


===

Hitler's Reference To Palestine Excites Arabs. - Page 1
Lawrence Journal-World · ‎ Sep 13, 1938.
Arab reaction today to Adolf Hitler's references to Palestine foreshadowed increased resistance in this troubled British mandate. "Now we are not without friends in Europe," an Arab spokesman said. "Our ultimate success as a nation lies In the hands of Hitler and Mussolini and not in Britain and France."
This was one response to Hitler's assertion at Nurnberg yesterday that "poor Arabs aro defenseless and left in the lurch."
View attachment 908138

The European Zionists were abusing Palestinians as early as 1920... long before Hitler.
 
The European Zionists were abusing Palestinians as early as 1920... long before Hitler.
Sure, "abusing" meaning buying land. Lol


ARAB RACISM


Director of the Arab Club (Mohammed Derweesh) to Allenby, Jerusalem April 1920: 'We declare that we cannot accept the Jews in our Country. [ ... ] We declare that we do not accept the Jews neither as guests nor as neighbours in Palestine.'

___

As local notable and religious leaders gathered, they delivered inflammatory speeches, contrary to the usual protocol (The National Archives, London [hereafter TNA], WO 32/9614, 1920). From a nearby balcony the mayor of Jerusalem – later dismissed by the British – Musa Kazim al-Husayni spoke against the Zionists and at the end of his speech the crowd roared 'Palestine is our land, the Jews are our dogs!' A young al-Hajj Amin, later to become the British-appointed Mufti of Jerusalem, shouted aloud 'O Arabs! This is your King!' while pictures of Faisal were displayed and acclaimed as King of Syria and Palestine. The famous journalist and historian Aref al-Aref declared, 'if we don't use force against the Jews, we will never be rid of them' (Segev, 2001: 128; TNA, WO/9614, 1920; Porath, 1974: 96–100).

___

From a report April 1920:

"For three days there was the same terrible thing in Jerusalem that was not like it and which was impossible to imagine even during the days of the Turkish rule, even the most difficult. For three days a pogrom among the Jews continued in the streets of Jerusalem. In the streets of Jerusalem and on the Temple Mount to slaughter the Jews, they beat the Jews while praying standing in front of the Western Wall. The streets of Jerusalem ran red with the blood of Jews, there were cases of rape of Israeli women, our Torah books were torn to shreds. The continuation of this politics was also seen during the days of the pogrom. We did not see any active intervention that would stop the pogrom immediately The pogrom could have been stopped not only by the intervention of force, but also by a desire to show the force. The rioters and the horses felt that they were free from any punishment. The old city was deserted for a long time without any protection. The police not only did not interfere with the actions of the rioters, because they themselves participated in the riots. The Jewish defense [Haganah] was not allowed to enter there.
 
Last edited:
Jews were turned away everywhere except Palestine. Long before Hitler.
Imam Surada - Don't lie.

The Arabs pressed the Brits not to accept any Jews.
Which forced the Brits on the White Paper in 1939.
And your nazi-Mufti intervened against saving thousands of children brcause they were about to head to Palestine...

1000002691.jpg

 
Last edited:
Sure, "abusing" meaning buying land. Lol


ARAB RACISM


Director of the Arab Club (Mohammed Derweesh) to Allenby, Jerusalem April 1920: 'We declare that we cannot accept the Jews in our Country. [ ... ] We declare that we do not accept the Jews neither as guests nor as neighbours in Palestine.'

___

As local notable and religious leaders gathered, they delivered inflammatory speeches, contrary to the usual protocol (The National Archives, London [hereafter TNA], WO 32/9614, 1920). From a nearby balcony the mayor of Jerusalem – later dismissed by the British – Musa Kazim al-Husayni spoke against the Zionists and at the end of his speech the crowd roared 'Palestine is our land, the Jews are our dogs!' A young al-Hajj Amin, later to become the British-appointed Mufti of Jerusalem, shouted aloud 'O Arabs! This is your King!' while pictures of Faisal were displayed and acclaimed as King of Syria and Palestine. The famous journalist and historian Aref al-Aref declared, 'if we don't use force against the Jews, we will never be rid of them' (Segev, 2001: 128; TNA, WO/9614, 1920; Porath, 1974: 96–100).

___

From a report April 1920:

"For three days there was the same terrible thing in Jerusalem that was not like it and which was impossible to imagine even during the days of the Turkish rule, even the most difficult. For three days a pogrom among the Jews continued in the streets of Jerusalem. In the streets of Jerusalem and on the Temple Mount to slaughter the Jews, they beat the Jews while praying standing in front of the Western Wall. The streets of Jerusalem ran red with the blood of Jews, there were cases of rape of Israeli women, our Torah books were torn to shreds. The continuation of this politics was also seen during the days of the pogrom. We did not see any active intervention that would stop the pogrom immediately The pogrom could have been stopped not only by the intervention of force, but also by a desire to show the force. The rioters and the horses felt that they were free from any punishment. The old city was deserted for a long time without any protection. The police not only did not interfere with the actions of the rioters, because they themselves participated in the riots. The Jewish defense [Haganah] was not allowed to enter there.
Imam Surada - Don't lie.

The Arabs pressed the Brits not to accept any Jews.
Which forced the Brits on the White Paper in 1939.
And your nazi-Mufti intervened against saving thousands of children brcause they were about to head to Palestine...


Imam Surada - Don't lie.

The Arabs pressed the Brits not to accept any Jews.
Which forced the Brits on the White Paper in 1939.
And your nazi-Mufti intervened against saving thousands of children brcause they were about to head to Palestine...



Imam? You're dumber than I thought. The Palestinian Jews and Christians didn't want the Zionists either. The European Jews were all Bolsheviks.

They didn't buy any land. By 1948 the Jews owned less than 8% of the land. They did confiscate the dairy farms of the Christians who arrived in 1890.
 
Allah akbar.

No. They were of a variety of opinion and ideologies, but the main victims of Arab butchery in the 1920s were not Socialists but religious non-Zionist pious Jews.

Bolshewiks are anti-zionists and anti israel. And of course were against religion.

Still, Arab Communists like Al Hilu supported the Arab riots in the 1930s.

By Stalin: In 1934 Radwan Al Hilu, a Palestinian Arab, was appointed by the Comintern as the secretary general of the PALESTINE COMMUNIST party which he held until his resignation from the party in 1943


Speaking on ideology. You, imam-Surada in your age, should already know that Pan-Arab BAATHISM is Socialism with Facism combined.

Or Nasser-ism.
 
Last edited:
Read more carefully.
{...
ARTICLE 95.

The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. (emphasis mine)
...}

And then the muslims fucked it up.
 
Imam? You're dumber than I thought. The Palestinian Jews and Christians didn't want the Zionists either. The European Jews were all Bolsheviks.

They didn't buy any land. By 1948 the Jews owned less than 8% of the land. They did confiscate the dairy farms of the Christians who arrived in 1890.

By 1948 the Jews owned less than 8% of the land.

About 8% more than the Muslims owned.
 


1000002702.jpgJuly 1, 1942


ARABS LIKE BLOOD AND THUNDER.

In Cairo, their reasons take a different, turn. Although the city is a boom town, due to the millions which British interests and troops have poured into the place since war began, the Egyptian man-in-the-street takes a malicious delight in watching the British take a few on the chin. Yet, like the Irish of Dublin, who feel the same way, they actually do want England to win this war.

In Syria and Palestine, where Hitler may one day move, sympathy for the axis among the Arabs is due to another reason. Their centuries-old heritage is an understanding of the "strong man" who maintains power by blood and the sword. King Ibn Saud, a despot having life and death power over millions, is largely respected and loved by his Arab subjects.

They sense in Hitler a similarity, as they listen to broadcasts in Arabic from Zeesen, Germany.


Prime Minister Winston Churchill and President Roosevelt, broadcasting about democracy, and discussing idealistic conditions which Arabs do not understand, unfortunately fail to impress them.
 
By 1948 the Jews owned less than 8% of the land.

About 8% more than the Muslims owned.

This is from 1937:

Easter Brings Little Prospect Of Peace To Holy Land

Times Daily · ‎ Mar 27, 1937 · ‎ Newspaper

Moslem Increase Keeps Pace

Far from Palestine being made a worse place for the Arabs, they pointed to the fact that the figures showed Arabs were actually moving Into Palestine from outside lands. Thus In 1922 there were 589,177 Moslems. 83,790 Jews and 71.747 Christians.
In 1936 there were 848.342 Moslems, 370,483 Jews and 106,474 Christians. In other words, in actual figures the increase in Moslems and Jews was almost equal.
On the other hand, although only 30 per cent of the population, the Jews pointed out they paid 60 per cent of the taxes of one of the few ountries in the world which shows a comfortable surplus and not a deficit in the treasury.
 
Jews were turned away everywhere except Palestine. Big mistake. The European Zionists always intended to forcibly remove the Palestinians. Read Theodore Herzl's journals. The Jews formed their terror gangs as early as 1920... Long before Hitler.


The problem is not with your admitting Jews were persecuted everywhere,
it's using it as an excuse for further persecution, and blatantly lying about
the Arab violence in Levant at the same time.

Do you use that argument to justify rape?

Zionism started in response to Arab massacres and expulsion
of the local longstanding communities of all the holy cities.

What was the Arab excuse for violence then?
 
Wait, THIS Treaty of Sevres?

ARTICLE 95.

The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. (emphasis mine)
Actually the Treaty of Sevres was never ratified. It was later replaced by the Treaty of Lausanne that did not have that clause.
 

Forum List

Back
Top