Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,376
- 12,952
- 2,400
The Pseudoscientist fraud is getting his deserved beating for attacking free speech and still owes the Ball family a lot of money for his other big lawsuit loss.
=====================
Watts Up With That?
Charles Rotter
May 23, 2025
Excerpt:
The Washington, D.C. Superior Court’s May 22, 2025 ruling against Michael Mann is the latest in a series of defeats for the climate scientist’s prolonged legal offensive against his critics. Judge Alfred S. Irving ordered Mann to pay $477,350.80 in attorney’s fees and related costs to the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) and Rand Simberg, following their successful partial dismissal of claims under the District’s Anti-SLAPP Act.
This judgment comes just months after a separate ruling ordered Mann to pay $540,820.21 to National Review. Together, the two awards raise Mann’s current liability to over $1.1 million—a staggering total for a campaign that began over a decade ago with the aim of silencing dissent through strategic litigation.
LINK
=====================
Watts Up With That?
Michael Mann’s Legal Costs Now Climbing Past $1.1 Million
Charles Rotter
May 23, 2025
Excerpt:
The Washington, D.C. Superior Court’s May 22, 2025 ruling against Michael Mann is the latest in a series of defeats for the climate scientist’s prolonged legal offensive against his critics. Judge Alfred S. Irving ordered Mann to pay $477,350.80 in attorney’s fees and related costs to the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) and Rand Simberg, following their successful partial dismissal of claims under the District’s Anti-SLAPP Act.
This judgment comes just months after a separate ruling ordered Mann to pay $540,820.21 to National Review. Together, the two awards raise Mann’s current liability to over $1.1 million—a staggering total for a campaign that began over a decade ago with the aim of silencing dissent through strategic litigation.
LINK
