Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
Actually, it is not true what you claim. At the end of the Cold war and the resulting decreased threat from the former USSR, naval submarine shipbuilding in the US dried up. The biggest issue for shipyards now is finding skilled tradesmen to build the submarines because they have gotten too old and retired or went to work in other more lucrative industries. I have seen numerous advertisements by shipyards looking for new people with the required skills to work in a newly rebounded industry with the current plan to build nuclear submarines for Australia and the UK in American shipyards. Do you know how many shipyards currently build commercial shipping in the US? Take a guess! You will be surprised at how low that number is. Why? They have no work. Ships are built more economically in other countries, such as South Korea, Taiwan and Japan, as well as China.Those jobs just don't blow away in the wind because we aren't at war or funding one... we are behind in stock piling our own weapons for our defense...
We also have several space programs alive and well where these people can find work...
No... that argument is like the one liberals used to use when they were anti war... they would say the troops being deployed costs the USA too much money... ignoring the fact that stateside troops still need to be paid and trained....
We don't have to actively be at war to keep people employed... that's a false argument...
The only stockpiles that are being replaced was Cold War era ammunition that was not reliable because of its age. Replacing weapons such as the Javelin are simply limited by the rate at which the factories can provide replacements. That isn't easily fixed by spending more money. It is just simply not physically possible to produce them at the rate they were being consumed.