New bill: Imprisonment for civilians celebrating terror attacks.

Lipush

Gold Member
Apr 11, 2012
18,675
2,729
270
Where the wild things are
While the state remained horrified due to the terror attack in Jerusalem yesterday (Sunday), which claimed the life of 4 soldiers, in East Jerusalem and Gaza residents celebrated with fireworks, and offered sweets to children. The new bill asks to bring to court and punish with inprisonment, those who publically celebrate and support terrorism. The bill was initiated by MK Michael Oren, who claimed the situation has become "unbearable".

According to the bill, those with blue ID who will celebrate or show support of terror publically, will be brought to court, with possibility of Imprisonment punishment. This new bill will cover all residents with blue IDs, so according to it, punishment will imply imply all sides of the conflict, like in case of the "Hate Wedding", in which far rightwingers celebrated the dead of Ali Dawabshe(victim of Duma attack) while repeatedly stabbing his photograph, during a wedding dance.

"The bill will put and end to all these 'celebrations'," MK said, "Bad enough that people celebrate these horrible attacks at home, but if they encourage and support terrorism publically, let them pay for it."

ื”ืฆืขืช ื—ื•ืง: ืขื•ื ืฉ ืžืืกืจ ื™ื•ื˜ืœ ืขืœ ืชื•ืžื›ื™ ื˜ืจื•ืจ ืฉื™ื—ื’ื’ื• ืื—ืจื™ ืคื™ื’ื•ืข - ื•ื•ืืœื”! ื—ื“ืฉื•ืช

-------

:clap::clap::clap:
 
While the state remained horrified due to the terror attack in Jerusalem yesterday (Sunday), which claimed the life of 4 soldiers, in East Jerusalem and Gaza residents celebrated with fireworks, and offered sweets to children. The new bill asks to bring to court and punish with inprisonment, those who publically celebrate and support terrorism. The bill was initiated by MK Michael Oren, who claimed the situation has become "unbearable".

According to the bill, those with blue ID who will celebrate or show support of terror publically, will be brought to court, with possibility of Imprisonment punishment. This new bill will cover all residents with blue IDs, so according to it, punishment will imply imply all sides of the conflict, like in case of the "Hate Wedding", in which far rightwingers celebrated the dead of Ali Dawabshe(victim of Duma attack) while repeatedly stabbing his photograph, during a wedding dance.

"The bill will put and end to all these 'celebrations'," MK said, "Bad enough that people celebrate these horrible attacks at home, but if they encourage and support terrorism publically, let them pay for it."

ื”ืฆืขืช ื—ื•ืง: ืขื•ื ืฉ ืžืืกืจ ื™ื•ื˜ืœ ืขืœ ืชื•ืžื›ื™ ื˜ืจื•ืจ ืฉื™ื—ื’ื’ื• ืื—ืจื™ ืคื™ื’ื•ืข - ื•ื•ืืœื”! ื—ื“ืฉื•ืช

-------

:clap::clap::clap:
yeah who gives a fuck about freedom of speech anyway
 
Not surprising. They are religious fascists. Few years ago, they banned people calling for boycotts of Israeli goods..
And im not sure but don't some media stories have to go through military censorship before publication?
 
Not surprising. They are religious fascists. Few years ago, they banned people calling for boycotts of Israeli goods..
And im not sure but don't some media stories have to go through military censorship before publication?

Wow, you mix things up.

The "Boycott" you're talking about means that the state won't fund those organization calling to boycott or destroy it. Just like you won't give cash to someone who wants to use the money you give them to buy a knife and stab you.

And military censorship is on order to protect the state's interest when the military is involved. Each country with an army has military censorship if said army plays a part in the story involved.

How is that an indication of anything?
 
While the state remained horrified due to the terror attack in Jerusalem yesterday (Sunday), which claimed the life of 4 soldiers, in East Jerusalem and Gaza residents celebrated with fireworks, and offered sweets to children. The new bill asks to bring to court and punish with inprisonment, those who publically celebrate and support terrorism. The bill was initiated by MK Michael Oren, who claimed the situation has become "unbearable".

According to the bill, those with blue ID who will celebrate or show support of terror publically, will be brought to court, with possibility of Imprisonment punishment. This new bill will cover all residents with blue IDs, so according to it, punishment will imply imply all sides of the conflict, like in case of the "Hate Wedding", in which far rightwingers celebrated the dead of Ali Dawabshe(victim of Duma attack) while repeatedly stabbing his photograph, during a wedding dance.

"The bill will put and end to all these 'celebrations'," MK said, "Bad enough that people celebrate these horrible attacks at home, but if they encourage and support terrorism publically, let them pay for it."

ื”ืฆืขืช ื—ื•ืง: ืขื•ื ืฉ ืžืืกืจ ื™ื•ื˜ืœ ืขืœ ืชื•ืžื›ื™ ื˜ืจื•ืจ ืฉื™ื—ื’ื’ื• ืื—ืจื™ ืคื™ื’ื•ืข - ื•ื•ืืœื”! ื—ื“ืฉื•ืช

-------

:clap::clap::clap:
yeah who gives a fuck about freedom of speech anyway

Only in the crazy west freedom of speech is more important than the peace and security of residents. Freedom of speech doesn't imply when there is a call to harm certain public, just because.
 
What laws Israelis act upon themselves is none of my concern.

I'd want to shoot a mother fucker who cheered for jihad.


This is not just for those who cheered for Jihad, but those who cheer when innocent people (especially children) die in terror or crimes with nationalist roots.
 
Not surprising. They are religious fascists. Few years ago, they banned people calling for boycotts of Israeli goods..
And im not sure but don't some media stories have to go through military censorship before publication?

Wow, you mix things up.

The "Boycott" you're talking about means that the state won't fund those organization calling to boycott or destroy it. Just like you won't give cash to someone who wants to use the money you give them to buy a knife and stab you.

And military censorship is on order to protect the state's interest when the military is involved. Each country with an army has military censorship if said army plays a part in the story involved.

How is that an indication of anything?
It is an indication that they are consistent on being totalitarians..
God forbid some students don't want to buy something from someone that uses bad ethics or something. God forbid!
Yeah, im sure that isn't a big deal considering the ongoing conflict in the country and the hostiles that surround it..
 
What laws Israelis act upon themselves is none of my concern.

I'd want to shoot a mother fucker who cheered for jihad.


This is not just for those who cheered for Jihad, but those who cheer when innocent people (especially children) die in terror or crimes with nationalist roots.

Like I said, it's Israeli law.

I wouldn't support a law like that here, because the only terrorism we are faced with is jihad and if such people cheered in the streets here the negative reaction would get them attention and consequences they would not like. I already want most mooselimbs thrown out. I don't trust a one of them.

14364731_1239497799445626_2857630119400860750_n.jpg


 
Not surprising. They are religious fascists. Few years ago, they banned people calling for boycotts of Israeli goods..
And im not sure but don't some media stories have to go through military censorship before publication?

Wow, you mix things up.

The "Boycott" you're talking about means that the state won't fund those organization calling to boycott or destroy it. Just like you won't give cash to someone who wants to use the money you give them to buy a knife and stab you.

And military censorship is on order to protect the state's interest when the military is involved. Each country with an army has military censorship if said army plays a part in the story involved.

How is that an indication of anything?
It is an indication that they are consistent on being totalitarians..
God forbid some students don't want to buy something from someone that uses bad ethics or something. God forbid!
Yeah, im sure that isn't a big deal considering the ongoing conflict in the country and the hostiles that surround it..

Wow, you seems to have difficulty understanding what I say. Nobody prohibits students from doing anything, this is ridiculous. Nobody obligates or forces any individual in doing something against their free will. The idea is not funding states organization which go against the state. They want to keep going against Israel? they can very well do it, but they won't take government money while doing it. There is nothing "totalitary" about it.

And this bill is nothing but common logic. Its idea is to protect the people of Israel from nationalist criminals.
 
What laws Israelis act upon themselves is none of my concern.

I'd want to shoot a mother fucker who cheered for jihad.


This is not just for those who cheered for Jihad, but those who cheer when innocent people (especially children) die in terror or crimes with nationalist roots.

Like I said, it's Israeli law.

I wouldn't support a law like that here, because the only terrorism we are faced with is jihad and if such people cheered in the streets here the negative reaction would get them attention and consequences they would not like. I already want most mooselimbs thrown out. I don't trust a one of them.

View attachment 105795


Ok.

But nontheless, I think that it's a good thing the bill is not "selective". In all fairness, celebrating gangsters can appear in all shapes and forms, so it is good to go against them in general.
 
Not surprising. They are religious fascists. Few years ago, they banned people calling for boycotts of Israeli goods..
And im not sure but don't some media stories have to go through military censorship before publication?

Wow, you mix things up.

The "Boycott" you're talking about means that the state won't fund those organization calling to boycott or destroy it. Just like you won't give cash to someone who wants to use the money you give them to buy a knife and stab you.

And military censorship is on order to protect the state's interest when the military is involved. Each country with an army has military censorship if said army plays a part in the story involved.

How is that an indication of anything?
It is an indication that they are consistent on being totalitarians..
God forbid some students don't want to buy something from someone that uses bad ethics or something. God forbid!
Yeah, im sure that isn't a big deal considering the ongoing conflict in the country and the hostiles that surround it..

Wow, you seems to have difficulty understanding what I say. Nobody prohibits students from doing anything, this is ridiculous. Nobody obligates or forces any individual in doing something against their free will. The idea is not funding states organization which go against the state. They want to keep going against Israel? they can very well do it, but they won't take government money while doing it. There is nothing "totalitary" about it.

And this bill is nothing but common logic. Its idea is to protect the people of Israel from nationalist criminals.
Lol nice spin. Honestly...
Totalitarianism isn't common sense. Common sense would warn you about totalitarianism.
 
Not surprising. They are religious fascists. Few years ago, they banned people calling for boycotts of Israeli goods..
And im not sure but don't some media stories have to go through military censorship before publication?

Wow, you mix things up.

The "Boycott" you're talking about means that the state won't fund those organization calling to boycott or destroy it. Just like you won't give cash to someone who wants to use the money you give them to buy a knife and stab you.

And military censorship is on order to protect the state's interest when the military is involved. Each country with an army has military censorship if said army plays a part in the story involved.

How is that an indication of anything?
It is an indication that they are consistent on being totalitarians..
God forbid some students don't want to buy something from someone that uses bad ethics or something. God forbid!
Yeah, im sure that isn't a big deal considering the ongoing conflict in the country and the hostiles that surround it..

Wow, you seems to have difficulty understanding what I say. Nobody prohibits students from doing anything, this is ridiculous. Nobody obligates or forces any individual in doing something against their free will. The idea is not funding states organization which go against the state. They want to keep going against Israel? they can very well do it, but they won't take government money while doing it. There is nothing "totalitary" about it.

And this bill is nothing but common logic. Its idea is to protect the people of Israel from nationalist criminals.
Lol nice spin. Honestly...
Totalitarianism isn't common sense. Common sense would warn you about totalitarianism.

'Totalitarianism' is a phrase often use by Liberals to describe things they disagree with. I'm just saying.

We should be careful about using this definition when it has no place whatsoever.
 
While the state remained horrified due to the terror attack in Jerusalem yesterday (Sunday), which claimed the life of 4 soldiers, in East Jerusalem and Gaza residents celebrated with fireworks, and offered sweets to children. The new bill asks to bring to court and punish with inprisonment, those who publically celebrate and support terrorism. The bill was initiated by MK Michael Oren, who claimed the situation has become "unbearable".

According to the bill, those with blue ID who will celebrate or show support of terror publically, will be brought to court, with possibility of Imprisonment punishment. This new bill will cover all residents with blue IDs, so according to it, punishment will imply imply all sides of the conflict, like in case of the "Hate Wedding", in which far rightwingers celebrated the dead of Ali Dawabshe(victim of Duma attack) while repeatedly stabbing his photograph, during a wedding dance.

"The bill will put and end to all these 'celebrations'," MK said, "Bad enough that people celebrate these horrible attacks at home, but if they encourage and support terrorism publically, let them pay for it."

ื”ืฆืขืช ื—ื•ืง: ืขื•ื ืฉ ืžืืกืจ ื™ื•ื˜ืœ ืขืœ ืชื•ืžื›ื™ ื˜ืจื•ืจ ืฉื™ื—ื’ื’ื• ืื—ืจื™ ืคื™ื’ื•ืข - ื•ื•ืืœื”! ื—ื“ืฉื•ืช

-------

:clap::clap::clap:
yeah who gives a fuck about freedom of speech anyway

Only in the crazy west freedom of speech is more important than the peace and security of residents. Freedom of speech doesn't imply when there is a call to harm certain public, just because.

agreeing with some sort of action is not a call to harm anyone

if some people celebrate because others were harmed then that's the price you pay to live in a free country and not under the thumb of the tought police

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
 
Not surprising. They are religious fascists. Few years ago, they banned people calling for boycotts of Israeli goods..
And im not sure but don't some media stories have to go through military censorship before publication?

Wow, you mix things up.

The "Boycott" you're talking about means that the state won't fund those organization calling to boycott or destroy it. Just like you won't give cash to someone who wants to use the money you give them to buy a knife and stab you.

And military censorship is on order to protect the state's interest when the military is involved. Each country with an army has military censorship if said army plays a part in the story involved.

How is that an indication of anything?
It is an indication that they are consistent on being totalitarians..
God forbid some students don't want to buy something from someone that uses bad ethics or something. God forbid!
Yeah, im sure that isn't a big deal considering the ongoing conflict in the country and the hostiles that surround it..

Wow, you seems to have difficulty understanding what I say. Nobody prohibits students from doing anything, this is ridiculous. Nobody obligates or forces any individual in doing something against their free will. The idea is not funding states organization which go against the state. They want to keep going against Israel? they can very well do it, but they won't take government money while doing it. There is nothing "totalitary" about it.

And this bill is nothing but common logic. Its idea is to protect the people of Israel from nationalist criminals.
Lol nice spin. Honestly...
Totalitarianism isn't common sense. Common sense would warn you about totalitarianism.

'Totalitarism' is a phrase often use by Liberals to describe things they disagree with. I'm just saying.

We should be careful about using this definition when it has no place whatsoever.
Except that is in fact a PERFECT example. There are MANY.
Sad thing is, they are about the freeist nation in the ME.. Glad I live in the west.
 
While the state remained horrified due to the terror attack in Jerusalem yesterday (Sunday), which claimed the life of 4 soldiers, in East Jerusalem and Gaza residents celebrated with fireworks, and offered sweets to children. The new bill asks to bring to court and punish with inprisonment, those who publically celebrate and support terrorism. The bill was initiated by MK Michael Oren, who claimed the situation has become "unbearable".

According to the bill, those with blue ID who will celebrate or show support of terror publically, will be brought to court, with possibility of Imprisonment punishment. This new bill will cover all residents with blue IDs, so according to it, punishment will imply imply all sides of the conflict, like in case of the "Hate Wedding", in which far rightwingers celebrated the dead of Ali Dawabshe(victim of Duma attack) while repeatedly stabbing his photograph, during a wedding dance.

"The bill will put and end to all these 'celebrations'," MK said, "Bad enough that people celebrate these horrible attacks at home, but if they encourage and support terrorism publically, let them pay for it."

ื”ืฆืขืช ื—ื•ืง: ืขื•ื ืฉ ืžืืกืจ ื™ื•ื˜ืœ ืขืœ ืชื•ืžื›ื™ ื˜ืจื•ืจ ืฉื™ื—ื’ื’ื• ืื—ืจื™ ืคื™ื’ื•ืข - ื•ื•ืืœื”! ื—ื“ืฉื•ืช

-------

:clap::clap::clap:
yeah who gives a fuck about freedom of speech anyway

Only in the crazy west freedom of speech is more important than the peace and security of residents. Freedom of speech doesn't imply when there is a call to harm certain public, just because.

agreeing with some sort of action is not a call to harm anyone

In the middle east it is.
 
Wow, you mix things up.

The "Boycott" you're talking about means that the state won't fund those organization calling to boycott or destroy it. Just like you won't give cash to someone who wants to use the money you give them to buy a knife and stab you.

And military censorship is on order to protect the state's interest when the military is involved. Each country with an army has military censorship if said army plays a part in the story involved.

How is that an indication of anything?
It is an indication that they are consistent on being totalitarians..
God forbid some students don't want to buy something from someone that uses bad ethics or something. God forbid!
Yeah, im sure that isn't a big deal considering the ongoing conflict in the country and the hostiles that surround it..

Wow, you seems to have difficulty understanding what I say. Nobody prohibits students from doing anything, this is ridiculous. Nobody obligates or forces any individual in doing something against their free will. The idea is not funding states organization which go against the state. They want to keep going against Israel? they can very well do it, but they won't take government money while doing it. There is nothing "totalitary" about it.

And this bill is nothing but common logic. Its idea is to protect the people of Israel from nationalist criminals.
Lol nice spin. Honestly...
Totalitarianism isn't common sense. Common sense would warn you about totalitarianism.

'Totalitarism' is a phrase often use by Liberals to describe things they disagree with. I'm just saying.

We should be careful about using this definition when it has no place whatsoever.
Except that is in fact a PERFECT example. There are MANY.
Sad thing is, they are about the freeist nation in the ME.. Glad I live in the west.

The same west which is now confronted with Islamic terrorism and is left helpless?
 
It is an indication that they are consistent on being totalitarians..
God forbid some students don't want to buy something from someone that uses bad ethics or something. God forbid!
Yeah, im sure that isn't a big deal considering the ongoing conflict in the country and the hostiles that surround it..

Wow, you seems to have difficulty understanding what I say. Nobody prohibits students from doing anything, this is ridiculous. Nobody obligates or forces any individual in doing something against their free will. The idea is not funding states organization which go against the state. They want to keep going against Israel? they can very well do it, but they won't take government money while doing it. There is nothing "totalitary" about it.

And this bill is nothing but common logic. Its idea is to protect the people of Israel from nationalist criminals.
Lol nice spin. Honestly...
Totalitarianism isn't common sense. Common sense would warn you about totalitarianism.

'Totalitarism' is a phrase often use by Liberals to describe things they disagree with. I'm just saying.

We should be careful about using this definition when it has no place whatsoever.
Except that is in fact a PERFECT example. There are MANY.
Sad thing is, they are about the freeist nation in the ME.. Glad I live in the west.

The same west which is now confronted with Islamic terrorism and is left helpless?
Stupid people get put in positions of power. But at least we don't have laws like this. I enjoy what freedoms I have left. If I want to support some psychotic asshole, I have that right.
Forced conformity is NEVER the answer.
 

Forum List

Back
Top