Carib Gyal
VIP Member
- Dec 20, 2014
- 2,216
- 320
It's weird. I don't have a problem with Obama eating a dog, no matter how old he was (Obama, not the dog). Neither do I have a problem with Ellen D's daughter standing on a dog, or Sarah Palin's son standing on a dog.If there was ever an example of the phony, hypocritical, moral outrage of liberals. It is the fact that Obama ATE dogs and liberals ignore that as "multiculturalism."
But Palin show a picture of a cute kid, standing on the family dog and liberals go into hysterics.
You guys are such complete phonies.
Here's where you're completely wrong.
I did have a HUGE problem with Obama eating a dog. Whether he knew he was or not. I had an even bigger problem with the adults who fed the dog to him.
You see, I'm not a partisan hack. You probably had a big problem with Obama eating a dog. Not for the same reasons I have a problem with it but only because he's a democratic president. It doesn't matter what Obama did over 40 years ago.
Yet you use that same situation to try to excuse what palin did.
I have a HUGE problem with what palin did. Not the reasons you think either. Mostly because that boy is now learning that dogs will let him stand on them. When he comes across one that doesn't allow him to do that, he will be hurt. Possibly seriously.
That's on top of the cruelty that's done to the dog by standing on it. A dog isn't a thing. A stepping stool is. A person should treat a dog with love and respect. A person should use a stepping stool to stand on.
I'm surprised I need to explain that to you.
Priorities, I guess.