Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
- Nov 15, 2008
- 55,062
- 16,609
But then you're as ditzy as Palin so shove your stupid info.Nope he had both feet on that poor dog and the dog's head was down. He was hurting that poor service dog for sure.It could possibly be that both issues are entirely ridiculous, I f Obama ate dog meat as a child in Indonesia or wherever it was, he probably didnt have much say in the matter, kids are generaly going to do what they are told ( except maybe Palin's kids, right?) Really a non issue there
If that single photo of the kids foot on the dog is some sort of basis for outrage then your outrage is pathetic. Is there another photo? cause from what I see you cannot get any context of what was taking place, it only takes about a second for a kid to put his foot on a dog like that, you have no idea whethrer he was simply rubbing his foot on the dogs back or about to put all his weight on the dog. I rather doubt that really happened, but I do think people that hate sara Palin and her family would really like to think so .
Don't be a bigger dumbass than nature already made you. If he'd been hurting the dog, the dog would have gotten up and moved and dumped the kid on his butt. As an experienced mother who's always had good-sized dogs, I can tell you this for a fact. The most patient, child-loving dog in the world will still not sit still to be caused pain by them.
Typical liberal. "I don't like you, and I want to believe THIS, so don't give me any facts that might contradict me, you big meanie head!"
Thanks for once again surrendering and running away like the ignorant embarrassment to women you always are.