Obama ate dogs and libs ignored it, go into hysterics over a down syndrome child standing on a dog

[bodecea]

The question isn't "why is that kid standing on the dog?" It's "Why is the mom taking a picture rather than rescuing the dog from the kid standing on it?"

The question should be, "does Obama still eat dogs?"

Well, for you Frank, I'm sure that IS the question.

 

[Stephanie]

The question isn't "why is that kid standing on the dog?" It's "Why is the mom taking a picture rather than rescuing the dog from the kid standing on it?"

The question should be, "does Obama still eat dogs?"

Probably would if he could.

 

[Clementine]

If there was ever an example of the phony, hypocritical, moral outrage of liberals. It is the fact that Obama ATE dogs and liberals ignore that as "multiculturalism."

But Palin show a picture of a cute kid, standing on the family dog and liberals go into hysterics.

You guys are such complete phonies.

When Ellen posted an identical picture, nary a word of criticism from anyone. It was kinda funny and the dog didn't seem to mind.
If the libs are now going to bash Palin, they better say the same for the picture Ellen posted. See pic that Ellen and everyone found funny at link.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3243269/posts?page=5

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Stephanie]

If there was ever an example of the phony, hypocritical, moral outrage of liberals. It is the fact that Obama ATE dogs and liberals ignore that as "multiculturalism."

But Palin show a picture of a cute kid, standing on the family dog and liberals go into hysterics.

You guys are such complete phonies.

When Ellen posted an identical picture, nary a word of criticism from anyone. It was kinda funny and the dog didn't seem to mind.
If the libs are now going to bash Palin, they better say the same for the picture Ellen posted. See pic that Ellen and everyone found funny at link.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3243269/posts?page=5

the people on here should be ashamed of themselves they let some GROUP like PETA make them look like uncaring fools by attacking the little boy with downs syndrome all because it was Sarah Palin. And that they can led around by the nose shouldn't make them feel to good either...baaaaa

 

[PaintMyHouse]

If there was ever an example of the phony, hypocritical, moral outrage of liberals. It is the fact that Obama ATE dogs and liberals ignore that as "multiculturalism."

But Palin show a picture of a cute kid, standing on the family dog and liberals go into hysterics.

You guys are such complete phonies.

When Ellen posted an identical picture, nary a word of criticism from anyone. It was kinda funny and the dog didn't seem to mind.
If the libs are now going to bash Palin, they better say the same for the picture Ellen posted. See pic that Ellen and everyone found funny at link.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3243269/posts?page=5

the people on here should be ashamed of themselves they let some GROUP like PETA make them look like uncaring fools by attacking the little boy with downs syndrome all because it was Sarah Palin.

We mostly attacked her, because you stupid little partisan fuckers wouldn't. The Drooler came later.

 

[Lakhota]

Did the kid get Down syndrome from Sarah? She seems to be the logical carrier with her stupidity and tongue hanging out.

 

[Vigilante]

Did the kid get Down syndrome from Sarah? She seems to be the logical carrier with her stupidity and tongue hanging out.

It was from hanging out on the RESERVATION, trying to help those stupid people!

 

[bodecea]

The question isn't "why is that kid standing on the dog?" It's "Why is the mom taking a picture rather than rescuing the dog from the kid standing on it?"

That is correct, and the answer is, she's almost a big a moron as he is.

I don't blame the kid...he doesn't know any better. What what kind of parent and pet owner, when seeing a child start standing on a dog, and not even a larger dog than the child, grabs for a camera instead of telling the child to not stand on the dog or else someone will get hurt?

 

[Lakhota]

Sarah's parenting skills are sad. Didn't Bristol get knocked up in Sarah's home?

Levi Johnston reveals on 'Tyra Banks' show that Sarah Palin knew he and Bristol were having sex.

Levi Johnston dishes on Palins for Tyra Banks - NY Daily News

 

[HenryBHough]

Sorta cute, liberals drooling fear at the mere mention of Governor Palin's name. Understandable when all they have resembling a presidential candidate is a brain-damaged old (and somewhat questionable) "woman".

 

[Lakhota]

Joan Rivers Calls Sarah Palin a Retarded Person - Breitbart

Colbert Sarah Palin Is A F--king Retard (VIDEO)

Well, there ya have it, folks.

 

[HenryBHough]

Joan Rivers is dead.

(warning, disturbing video tho no maggots visible)

Source Joan Rivers doc did biopsy selfie at clinic - CNN.com

 

[Lakhota]

 

[DriftingSand]

If there was ever an example of the phony, hypocritical, moral outrage of liberals. It is the fact that Obama ATE dogs and liberals ignore that as "multiculturalism."

But Palin show a picture of a cute kid, standing on the family dog and liberals go into hysterics.

You guys are such complete phonies.

I fully agree that Libs live by double standards as a matter of routine but I don't think Palin (or whoever took this picture) should let a kid this size stand on a family pet. It could damage the dog's spine and/or cause unnecessary pain or discomfort. The boy likely doesn't know better but the adults in the household do and should be held accountable for allowing mistreatment of that poor dog. I'm speaking as a Conservative and as an animal lover.

 

[bodecea]

Joan Rivers is dead.

(warning, disturbing video tho no maggots visible)

Source Joan Rivers doc did biopsy selfie at clinic - CNN.com

Funny thing, so is Robert Byrd.

 

[AntiParty]

Yeah dummy, don't let your moron, literally, kid stand on the fucking dog.

But it's okay if a liberal EATS a dog!

Thank you for proving what a moral hypocrite you are!

Where dogs are food it's okay if anybody does dummy, but I'd like it if they didn't. Dog I have not tried but I've eaten plenty of other kinds of "meat".

^But they are the party that "doesn't react on emotions".......

Most of them haven't left town, let alone the Country. They don't know different people eat different meat. Even if it is cute.

You are what you eat. If you are willing to kill an animal for food then kill it and eat it if you NEED it. THAT is the basic concept.

If you are one of the bone heads that thinks it's ok to eat a cow but not a horse because horses are "pretty" then you have to examine your brain. If you need to kill something for food, "Pretty Pet" doesn't matter.

If you can't kill an animal for food then go Veggies, Beans, Seeds, and Fruit. This will help our disease and healthcare rates.

Note; Abusing an animal is different than harvesting it for food. The movie Avatar should have taught you that if you are young.

 

[JFK_USA]

that cracked me up.

Obviously, it doesn't take much to entertain a simpleton like you.

And even less to send you sputtering!

I'm sorry. I didn't mean to insult your mom. But it isn't hard to see where you inherited your lack of intelligence from. Yes, you are the simpleton son.

Oh, boy the libs are sputtering!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You can tell when they have been nailed!

Why can't you be outraged at both? Palin should have known better than to have a child standing on a dog. I don't have my 6 year old stand on my dog because it can hurt him.

Now, Palin is in her 40s and Obama was a young child, in a country where they do eat dogs, told by an adult to eat what's on his plate. I doubt at 11 years old he is thinking "boy I better not do this or republicans are going to irrationally hate me for it" so the situations are different.

But you can still express your outrage about both and say both aren't okay. Supporting the president's party does not mean you support everything he has ever done in his life.

 

[teapartysamurai]

40+ years ago, an 11yo boy ate the plate of food the adults put in front of him, just as the OP has said her own mother does for her now. That little boy grew up to save the United States from a full out depression.

Now, the OP is defending an admittedly incompetent mother who said the family dog took better care of her handicapped, mute child while she took photos and then posted them to the internet. That mother is, as we know, a professional quitter, whiner, loser, drunk who pushed through legislation to make legal the shooting of urban dogs and wild wolves. Thousands and thousands of dogs have suffered because of $imple$arah.

Can't get much more dishonest and hypocritical than that.

And just yesterday you posted an article claiming California is trying to stop Palin from doing anything she damn well pleases IN ALASKA!!!!

You suddenly went quiet about that.

And I'm defending????

You liberal morons tried to make a big deal about a charming picture of a dog helping a down syndrome child reaching something.

If this had been done by one of the Obama children with Bo, you would have all melted with the cuteness.

But it's Palin and you can't help yourselves. PALIN DERANGEMENT SYNDROME will not allow that.

So much so you cite an OBVIOUSLY BOGUS ARTICLE to back up your Derangement.

Who is on the defense here????????

 

[teapartysamurai]

Luddy went quiet.

Could it be, in his mindless zeal to justify Obama's dog eating he fell for a bogus article?

Not going to wait for you to defend $arah's lack of decent parenting or the cruel shooting of wolves from the air.

She also pushed through a bill on "urban hunting" so people could shoot dogs inside city limits.

Any way you look at it, she's directly responsible for a lot more dogs suffering and death than the one President Obama ate at the age of 11.

I have to defend you posting a BOGUS ARTICLE where you claim California is trying to stop Palin from doing ANYTHING in Alaska??????????

Nice attempt at spinning this, but YOU STUCK YOUR FOOT IN IT PAL, I DIDN'T!

Now do you have an article where Wyoming is trying to stop her too?

First, look up the definition of the word "bogus".

Second, look at the phony photos you've posted here.

Third, ask your mommy to read the article out loud to you.

Lying hypocrite "christian".

You gonna start in now about how I'm stalking you? Threatening, bullying, trying to get you banned?

A) Those "bogus" photos are based on something real. OBAMA ATE DOG.

B) Your bogus article is based on the idea California being able to do anything to stop Sarah Palin in ALASKA!

So, sorry you fail again!

Now about how you liberals admit that your whole phony outraged is based on PALIN DERANGEMENT SYNDROME.