Samson
Póg Mo Thóin
- Dec 3, 2009
- 27,332
- 4,237
A pre WWII Army is a completely different animal from todays modernized force. A 1940 Army was labor intensive and relied heavily on infantry.
Todays Army is highly mechanized and computerized. Makes it much more efficient. To assume that if we have the same manpower as 1940 we have the same military strength is ridiculous.
We have to look at the proposed mission of a Modern Army and how many troops we need to execute that mission
Indeed, but otherwise how will we find federal employment for thousands of undereducated minority dykes?
They cannot all be mail carriers, you know.
That's for a whole separate thread.
I thought we were discussing the mission of the Modern Army, and troops needed?