Presidents speech tonight

[Weatherman2020]

More neocon nonsense.

What is nonsense is Obama saying we need to pass legislation on guns for terrorist's to get guns on the no fly list, even though there has never been any mass shootings from anyone who is on the no fly list.

Every Leftards wet dream - deny Americans their Constitutional Rights by simply having some unknown desk jockey put your name on a list.

And for the record, Ted Kennedy was on that no fly list once.

 

[PoliticalChic]

More neocon nonsense.

3. This is what was missing from the speech by the windbag in the White House:

a. New rules of engagement for the air force: more sortees and no coming home with bombs not dropped.

b. More American troops to lead in the battle

c. Surveillance of mosques here at home


Nonsense?
You must be a Liberal and an America-hater, huh?

More namecalling, that which you call proof you've lost the argument.

The Paris and San Bernardino attacks occurred AFTER the Russians came in with their very aggressive air attacks.

How will the US following that practice prevent more ISIS terrorism outside Iraq/Syria?

I agree..."Liberal" falls under the rubric of name-calling.

 

[tyroneweaver]

In his speech, Obama once again asked the Republican Congress to approve an AUMF against ISIS. The ostriches have refused to do so for over a year.

Finally, if Congress believes, as I do, that we are at war with ISIL, it should go ahead and vote to authorize the continued use of military force against these terrorists. For over a year, I have ordered our military to take thousands of airstrikes against ISIL targets. I think it's time for Congress to vote to demonstrate that the American people are united, and committed, to this fight.

Amazing how overnight so many of you libs have become hawkish.

 

[easyt65]

More neocon nonsense.

Thank you, 'Sgt Schultz'.

 

[Weatherman2020]

"Is that it?"

- The official response of the Republican Party to complicated issues

They want another large scale war in the ME. That is indisputable. They are addicted to repeating history.

The world is already in the middle of WW3. Leftists have just not opened their eyes to reality.

 

[easyt65]

"Is that it?"

- The official response of the Republican Party to complicated issues

They want another large scale war in the ME. That is indisputable. They are addicted to repeating history.

The world is already in the middle of WW3. Leftists have just not opened their eyes to reality.

--- They are still squinting, blinded - like a mole dragged out into the sunlight. They still want NOTHING more right now than to crawl back into the darkness from which they came and in which they dwell.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Is that it?"

- The official response of the Republican Party to complicated issues

They want another large scale war in the ME. That is indisputable. They are addicted to repeating history.

The world is already in the middle of WW3. Leftists have just not opened their eyes to reality.

And let us never forget who put the world in this position:

1. Obama by ignoring expert's advice and gratuitously removing American troops, thereby providing a welcome mat for ISIS....

2. ..and any dope who voted for this dunce.

 

[NYcarbineer]

"Is that it?"

- The official response of the Republican Party to complicated issues

They want another large scale war in the ME. That is indisputable. They are addicted to repeating history.

The world is already in the middle of WW3. Leftists have just not opened their eyes to reality.

Nonsense. A few thousand nuts in the ME are not WW3. You just wish it were WW3 because you're part of the rightwing death cult.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

"Is that it?"

- The official response of the Republican Party to complicated issues

They want another large scale war in the ME. That is indisputable. They are addicted to repeating history.

The world is already in the middle of WW3. Leftists have just not opened their eyes to reality.

Agree, we're already in WW3.

 

[NYcarbineer]

"Is that it?"

- The official response of the Republican Party to complicated issues

They want another large scale war in the ME. That is indisputable. They are addicted to repeating history.

The world is already in the middle of WW3. Leftists have just not opened their eyes to reality.

And let us never forget who put the world in this position:

1. Obama by ignoring expert's advice and gratuitously removing American troops, thereby providing a welcome mat for ISIS....

2. ..and any dope who voted for this dunce.

There was no such 'expert' advice. Bush agreed we were getting out, the Iraqi government wanted us out, the Iraqi people wanted us out, the American people wanted us out.

You're retarded to think that somehow Obama is the villain for following that consensus.

 

[ClosedCaption]

"Is that it?"

- The official response of the Republican Party to complicated issues

They want another large scale war in the ME. That is indisputable. They are addicted to repeating history.

The world is already in the middle of WW3. Leftists have just not opened their eyes to reality.

Way to overstate the situation

 

[NYcarbineer]

"Is that it?"

- The official response of the Republican Party to complicated issues

They want another large scale war in the ME. That is indisputable. They are addicted to repeating history.

The world is already in the middle of WW3. Leftists have just not opened their eyes to reality.

Agree, we're already in WW3.

lol. The hysteria finds a new level.

 

[Camp]

More neocon nonsense.

What is nonsense is Obama saying we need to pass legislation on guns for terrorist's to get guns on the no fly list, even though there has never been any mass shootings from anyone who is on the no fly list.

Every Leftards wet dream - deny Americans their Constitutional Rights by simply having some unknown desk jockey put your name on a list.

And for the record, Ted Kennedy was on that no fly list once.

Probably too complicated for the Republican Congress to design and write an acceptable no-fly law and conflate and coordinate it with a checklist.

 

[NYcarbineer]

We have one combat death in the ME fighting ISIS. We should do what Reagan did in 1983,

pack up and come home.

 

[ClosedCaption]

What are we going to do? Wipe out ideas to end this war? How do you do that?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

"Is that it?"

- The official response of the Republican Party to complicated issues

They want another large scale war in the ME. That is indisputable. They are addicted to repeating history.

The world is already in the middle of WW3. Leftists have just not opened their eyes to reality.

Agree, we're already in WW3.

lol. The hysteria finds a new level.

I know that its difficult for you to comprehend. No worries, its very doubtful that we'll even be participating when this one blows up. We're too weak.

 

[NYcarbineer]

How many of you banging the drum for another useless full scale war in the ME will be making a personal sacrifice to support it?

 

[NYcarbineer]

"Is that it?"

- The official response of the Republican Party to complicated issues

They want another large scale war in the ME. That is indisputable. They are addicted to repeating history.

The world is already in the middle of WW3. Leftists have just not opened their eyes to reality.

Agree, we're already in WW3.

lol. The hysteria finds a new level.

I know that its difficult for you to comprehend. No worries, its very doubtful that we'll even be participating when this one blows up. We're too weak.

I know you're an idiot. What will your contribution to this imaginary WW3 be?

Specifically.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Is that it?"

- The official response of the Republican Party to complicated issues

They want another large scale war in the ME. That is indisputable. They are addicted to repeating history.

The world is already in the middle of WW3. Leftists have just not opened their eyes to reality.

And let us never forget who put the world in this position:

1. Obama by ignoring expert's advice and gratuitously removing American troops, thereby providing a welcome mat for ISIS....

2. ..and any dope who voted for this dunce.

There was no such 'expert' advice. Bush agreed we were getting out, the Iraqi government wanted us out, the Iraqi people wanted us out, the American people wanted us out.

You're retarded to think that somehow Obama is the villain for following that consensus.

So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!!!


"BLITZER:You don't think the administration tried hard enough to get it?

BARBERO: I don't think so.

BLITZER: That's the McCain position, that could have been done butthe White House didn't want it to be done. They wanted all U.S. troops.

BARBERO: I don't think we tried hard enough.

BLITZER: You think it was - it was definitely doable.

BARBERO: I think it was. BLITZER: There was another argument that the Pentagon wanted 5,000 to 10,000 U.S. troops to remain.

BARBERO: Right."
CNN.com - Transcripts



Obama arranged for the field to be left open for ISIS.

You decide why.



"In one of his final acts in office, President Bush in December of 2008 had signed a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the Iraqi government thatset the clock ticking on ending the war he’d launched in March of 2003. The SOFA provided a legal basis for the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq after the United Nations Security Council mandate for the occupation mission expired at the end of 2008. But it required that all U.S. forces be gone from Iraq by January 1, 2012, unless the Iraqi government was willing to negotiate a new agreement that would extend their mandate. "
Iraq’s Government, Not Obama, Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence | TIME.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

More neocon nonsense.

What is nonsense is Obama saying we need to pass legislation on guns for terrorist's to get guns on the no fly list, even though there has never been any mass shootings from anyone who is on the no fly list.

Every Leftards wet dream - deny Americans their Constitutional Rights by simply having some unknown desk jockey put your name on a list.

And for the record, Ted Kennedy was on that no fly list once.

Probably too complicated for the Republican Congress to design and write an acceptable no-fly law and conflate and coordinate it with a checklist.

Thank heaven you changed "to" to 'too."

It was like fingernails on a blackboard.