Project Lift

Synthaholic

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
75,614
Reaction score
73,457
Points
3,605
We will be hearing a lot about this. It is illegal to require a Federal employee to sign an NDA.




 
It's hard to believe that twat played such a prominent role in our government, and after helping trash the government he was involved in, will now benefit financially from the Trump grift. Not a bit surprising, of course.
 
Another brilliant editorial, hahaha. No comment on your content?

How about posting the law you are referencing. Last I checked most stuff in the government in the government cant be disclosed.

That is why we hear of people leaking information getting prosecuted.

Democrats are morons, cause you idiots claim everything Trump does is illegal
 
Would anyone be surprised if it came out that DOGE/Ellen cuts to FAA caused all those crashes, the NDAs are to cover it up, for the purpose of making FAA look incompetent in order to replace it with Ellen's private business, being in charge of our skies?

I would not be surprised.
 
We will be hearing a lot about this. It is illegal to require a Federal employee to sign an NDA.







NDAs are legal for federal employees per 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(13) as long as it contains a required statement and does not prohibit whistleblowing.
 
We will be hearing a lot about this. It is illegal to require a Federal employee to sign an NDA.






Do we have a link to where it's against the law?

Reading the rolling stone article, I came across this:

The FAA did push back on the idea that DOGE is driving Project Lift. "DOGE is not spearheading anything at the FAA, nor are there any DOGE employees at FAA," the agency spokesperson says. "Project Lift was conceived and is managed by federal employees."


Speaking about the NDAs, the FAA spokesperson says: "Employees routinely sign non-disclosure agreements to avoid conflicts of interest."

It says that doge is not spearheading the project and FAA employees routinely sign NDAs.
 
Thanks for not reading the OP.

Your OP implies that NDAs are only lawful when applied to classified information....

1745714936998.webp


This is false.
 
You Lie!

Here is the U.S. Federal government's standard form SF-312 NDA.



Why do you base all of your political opinions on the incredibly stupid and easily disproven lies that you constantly tell yourself?
You are too fucking stupid to read what Bradley Moss says in the first post of this thread. Yet you still shoot off your ignorant mouth, showing your ass every time.
 
Back
Top Bottom