Questions.....RE: The Greenhouse Effect

and moisture, water. again, exhale on a mirror.

Yup. A tiny bit of water vapor.
yep, so again, why can't you see her breath?

You seem more forgetful than usual. Does that worry you?

Air is a poor absorber/poor emitter.
then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR? you just busted your own theory. funny

then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR?

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

you just busted your own theory.

My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.
My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't. I don't think they make videos of capturing nothing.
 
yep, so again, why can't you see her breath?

You seem more forgetful than usual. Does that worry you?

Air is a poor absorber/poor emitter.
then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR?

Depends on the meter.
sure it does. One cooled down so one can see heat.

The ice cream camera doesn't look cooled. So what did it read?
already asked and answered. got anything else?
 
Photons moving from cooler matter to warmer matter is a fail? LOL!

As the text from The Handbook of Modern Sensors says...it isn't measuring photons moving from cool to warm...what is being measured is how much, and how fast the sensor is losing energy to the colder object...the image is the result of energy leaving the camera, not coming into it. Sorry this is all so far over your head. The more you talk, the more apparent it becomes why you only talk in one liners...if you were to speak more than a single sentence at once, your abject ignorance would flare forth like a spotlight.
he doesn't appear to understand electronics.
 
Neither did he in his post

I agree, he didn't say the flaw in his theory was a mystery......he just evaded the flaw.
I didn’t say anything about a flaw was mentioned

I agree, you didn't notice his flaw.
Or you noticed it and didn't mention it.
I didn’t notice one because there isn’t any there. It’s that simple. Perhaps you could tell us where the heat source originated on the sun. Seems you believe it is the corona?

I didn’t notice one because there isn’t any there.

You didn't notice the flaw?
He said cooler matter can't radiate at warmer matter.
His flaw is as large as the Sun in the sky.

Perhaps you could tell us where the heat source originated on the sun.

Fusion occurs at the core.
Fusion occurs at the core.

so that is the source fire that radiates to the universe. Why wouldn't it be radiating out toward space?

If I put wood in a fire pit and light it, that is a source of heat and it radiates just like the sun.

So where's his flaw again?
 
Yup. A tiny bit of water vapor.
yep, so again, why can't you see her breath?

You seem more forgetful than usual. Does that worry you?

Air is a poor absorber/poor emitter.
then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR? you just busted your own theory. funny

then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR?

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

you just busted your own theory.

My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.
My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't. I don't think they make videos of capturing nothing.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't.

What was that camera reading if not IR?
 
I agree, he didn't say the flaw in his theory was a mystery......he just evaded the flaw.
I didn’t say anything about a flaw was mentioned

I agree, you didn't notice his flaw.
Or you noticed it and didn't mention it.
I didn’t notice one because there isn’t any there. It’s that simple. Perhaps you could tell us where the heat source originated on the sun. Seems you believe it is the corona?

I didn’t notice one because there isn’t any there.

You didn't notice the flaw?
He said cooler matter can't radiate at warmer matter.
His flaw is as large as the Sun in the sky.

Perhaps you could tell us where the heat source originated on the sun.

Fusion occurs at the core.
Fusion occurs at the core.

so that is the source fire that radiates to the universe. Why wouldn't it be radiating out toward space?

If I put wood in a fire pit and light it, that is a source of heat and it radiates just like the sun.

So where's his flaw again?

so that is the source fire that radiates to the universe.

Yup.

Why wouldn't it be radiating out toward space?

Because SSDD thinks it can't radiate toward the hotter corona.
 
You seem more forgetful than usual. Does that worry you?

Air is a poor absorber/poor emitter.
then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR?

Depends on the meter.
sure it does. One cooled down so one can see heat.

The ice cream camera doesn't look cooled. So what did it read?
already asked and answered. got anything else?

already asked and answered.

Yes, you said that "there will be a change in the amperage through the sensor"

You never did say what the sensor sensed.

got anything else?

Besides your evasion? No.
 
yep, so again, why can't you see her breath?

You seem more forgetful than usual. Does that worry you?

Air is a poor absorber/poor emitter.
then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR? you just busted your own theory. funny

then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR?

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

you just busted your own theory.

My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.
My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't. I don't think they make videos of capturing nothing.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't.

What was that camera reading if not IR?
What was that camera reading if not IR?

asked and answered now for the second time.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs. If they are so sure, why can't they provide evidence of it.
 
You seem more forgetful than usual. Does that worry you?

Air is a poor absorber/poor emitter.
then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR? you just busted your own theory. funny

then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR?

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

you just busted your own theory.

My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.
My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't. I don't think they make videos of capturing nothing.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't.

What was that camera reading if not IR?
What was that camera reading if not IR?

asked and answered now for the second time.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs. If they are so sure, why can't they provide evidence of it.

asked and answered now for the second time.

What post did you answer it in?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs.

You've never seen evidence that matter emits photons?
 
then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR?

Depends on the meter.
sure it does. One cooled down so one can see heat.

The ice cream camera doesn't look cooled. So what did it read?
already asked and answered. got anything else?

already asked and answered.

Yes, you said that "there will be a change in the amperage through the sensor"

You never did say what the sensor sensed.

got anything else?

Besides your evasion? No.
You never did say what the sensor sensed.

Do you know what current flow is? . if you don't, then you won't understand how changes in current flows are sensed in circuits. The designers put in electronic components that are designed to react to voltage and current changes. you should read up on how Voltage, Resistance and Current /Amps work.

the one thing I can assure you of in the video, is that they are not detecting IR because if it were, then you'd see the girl's breath.
 
then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR? you just busted your own theory. funny

then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR?

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

you just busted your own theory.

My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.
My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't. I don't think they make videos of capturing nothing.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't.

What was that camera reading if not IR?
What was that camera reading if not IR?

asked and answered now for the second time.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs. If they are so sure, why can't they provide evidence of it.

asked and answered now for the second time.

What post did you answer it in?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs.

You've never seen evidence that matter emits photons?
ones previous to this one.

When are you going to answer my question on the girls breath?
 
then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR?

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

you just busted your own theory.

My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.
My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't. I don't think they make videos of capturing nothing.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't.

What was that camera reading if not IR?
What was that camera reading if not IR?

asked and answered now for the second time.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs. If they are so sure, why can't they provide evidence of it.

asked and answered now for the second time.

What post did you answer it in?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs.

You've never seen evidence that matter emits photons?
ones previous to this one.

When are you going to answer my question on the girls breath?

Air is a poor emitter.
How does it sense a different temperature between skin and ice cream?
 
Depends on the meter.
sure it does. One cooled down so one can see heat.

The ice cream camera doesn't look cooled. So what did it read?
already asked and answered. got anything else?

already asked and answered.

Yes, you said that "there will be a change in the amperage through the sensor"

You never did say what the sensor sensed.

got anything else?

Besides your evasion? No.
You never did say what the sensor sensed.

Do you know what current flow is? . if you don't, then you won't understand how changes in current flows are sensed in circuits. The designers put in electronic components that are designed to react to voltage and current changes. you should read up on how Voltage, Resistance and Current /Amps work.

the one thing I can assure you of in the video, is that they are not detecting IR because if it were, then you'd see the girl's breath.

Do you know what current flow is? .

I do. Do you know what caused the current to flow?

the one thing I can assure you of in the video, is that they are not detecting IR

I wonder what they're detecting if not IR?
 
then how can one point a thermal meter at the sky and read IR?

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

you just busted your own theory.

My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.
My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't. I don't think they make videos of capturing nothing.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't.

What was that camera reading if not IR?
What was that camera reading if not IR?

asked and answered now for the second time.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs. If they are so sure, why can't they provide evidence of it.

asked and answered now for the second time.

What post did you answer it in?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs.

You've never seen evidence that matter emits photons?
ones previous to this one.

When are you going to answer my question on the girls breath?

Asked and answered.
 
My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't. I don't think they make videos of capturing nothing.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't.

What was that camera reading if not IR?
What was that camera reading if not IR?

asked and answered now for the second time.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs. If they are so sure, why can't they provide evidence of it.

asked and answered now for the second time.

What post did you answer it in?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs.

You've never seen evidence that matter emits photons?
ones previous to this one.

When are you going to answer my question on the girls breath?

Air is a poor emitter.
How does it sense a different temperature between skin and ice cream?
Air is a poor emitter.

but it can radiate twice that of the sun from what you all say. hmmmmmm seems you are confused.

How does it sense a different temperature between skin and ice cream?
Asked and answered.
 
sure it does. One cooled down so one can see heat.

The ice cream camera doesn't look cooled. So what did it read?
already asked and answered. got anything else?

already asked and answered.

Yes, you said that "there will be a change in the amperage through the sensor"

You never did say what the sensor sensed.

got anything else?

Besides your evasion? No.
You never did say what the sensor sensed.

Do you know what current flow is? . if you don't, then you won't understand how changes in current flows are sensed in circuits. The designers put in electronic components that are designed to react to voltage and current changes. you should read up on how Voltage, Resistance and Current /Amps work.

the one thing I can assure you of in the video, is that they are not detecting IR because if it were, then you'd see the girl's breath.

Do you know what current flow is? .

I do. Do you know what caused the current to flow?

the one thing I can assure you of in the video, is that they are not detecting IR

I wonder what they're detecting if not IR?
I do. Do you know what caused the current to flow?
Batteries. The voltage.
 
My theory? Scientists have known about matter emitting photons long before I was born.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Find a video like the ice cream video and I'll be glad to discuss it.

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't. I don't think they make videos of capturing nothing.

Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't.

What was that camera reading if not IR?
What was that camera reading if not IR?

asked and answered now for the second time.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs. If they are so sure, why can't they provide evidence of it.

asked and answered now for the second time.

What post did you answer it in?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs.

You've never seen evidence that matter emits photons?
ones previous to this one.

When are you going to answer my question on the girls breath?

Asked and answered.
Asked and answered

What post? I can play your game.
 
The ice cream camera doesn't look cooled. So what did it read?
already asked and answered. got anything else?

already asked and answered.

Yes, you said that "there will be a change in the amperage through the sensor"

You never did say what the sensor sensed.

got anything else?

Besides your evasion? No.
You never did say what the sensor sensed.

Do you know what current flow is? . if you don't, then you won't understand how changes in current flows are sensed in circuits. The designers put in electronic components that are designed to react to voltage and current changes. you should read up on how Voltage, Resistance and Current /Amps work.

the one thing I can assure you of in the video, is that they are not detecting IR because if it were, then you'd see the girl's breath.

Do you know what current flow is? .

I do. Do you know what caused the current to flow?

the one thing I can assure you of in the video, is that they are not detecting IR

I wonder what they're detecting if not IR?
I do. Do you know what caused the current to flow?
Batteries. The voltage.

It flows for no reason? Doesn't something have to trigger the sensor?
 
Wow that's a long time to be wrong.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

I've been waiting on your video of a device that is actually reading IR. The ice cream didn't.

What was that camera reading if not IR?
What was that camera reading if not IR?

asked and answered now for the second time.

Scientists are wrong about matter above 0K emitting photons?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs. If they are so sure, why can't they provide evidence of it.

asked and answered now for the second time.

What post did you answer it in?

still waiting on the evidence that occurs.

You've never seen evidence that matter emits photons?
ones previous to this one.

When are you going to answer my question on the girls breath?

Asked and answered.
Asked and answered

What post? I can play your game.

Questions.....RE: The Greenhouse Effect
 
already asked and answered. got anything else?

already asked and answered.

Yes, you said that "there will be a change in the amperage through the sensor"

You never did say what the sensor sensed.

got anything else?

Besides your evasion? No.
You never did say what the sensor sensed.

Do you know what current flow is? . if you don't, then you won't understand how changes in current flows are sensed in circuits. The designers put in electronic components that are designed to react to voltage and current changes. you should read up on how Voltage, Resistance and Current /Amps work.

the one thing I can assure you of in the video, is that they are not detecting IR because if it were, then you'd see the girl's breath.

Do you know what current flow is? .

I do. Do you know what caused the current to flow?

the one thing I can assure you of in the video, is that they are not detecting IR

I wonder what they're detecting if not IR?
I do. Do you know what caused the current to flow?
Batteries. The voltage.

It flows for no reason? Doesn't something have to trigger the sensor?
It flows for no reason? Doesn't something have to trigger the sensor?

asked and answered.
 

Forum List

Back
Top