Random Shooting in New Orleans...it’s Idiots...Not Guns

[BULLDOG]

Only a gun nut would think that is a relevant remark.

Tell that to the people in Nice, France where the muslim terrorist used a rental truck to murder 86 people and injured 435....in 5 minutes...... a lot cheaper way to commit mass murder than a gun......

Typical gun nut figuring out the lowest cost-per-death. You sign up for a special plan where you can kill two at the regular price, and get one free?

Typical left wing asshat who blames the gun and not the shooter....who supports the democrats who keep letting violent criminals, repeat gun offenders, out of jail who then go on to commit murder....and then frigid the asshat complains that they used a gun........ When if they had been kept in jail, the victim would still be alive... but live victims don't work for frigid, he needs dead people to get his gun bans passed..

There are more than enough dead people, and as long as the NRA fights for the ability of crazies and thugs to buy all the guns they want, we will have even more dead people. England doesn't kill nearly as many as we do. We should copy what they are doing.

Where does the NRA do that? If you want to stop criminals from getting guns, tell the Democrat party to stop letting violent repeat gun offenders out of prison.....and stop reducing sentences for gun crimes in general.

this is the Truth..... the NRA fights to stop gun crime, the Democrat party fights to free actual, repeat gun offenders.....do you know why the do this...?

California Democrats hate the gun, not the gunman – Orange County Register

Now that Democrats have supermajorities in the California state Legislature, they’ve rolled into Sacramento with a zest for lowering the state’s prison population and have interpreted St. Augustine’s words of wisdom to mean, “Hate the gun, not the gunman.”

I say this because, once they finally took a break from preaching about the benefits of stricter gun control, the state Senate voted to loosen sentencing guidelines for criminals convicted of gun crimes.

Currently, California law requires anyone who uses a gun while committing a felony to have their sentence increased by 10 years or more in prison — on top of the normal criminal penalty. If enacted, Senate Bill 620 would eliminate that mandate.

The bill, which passed on a 22-14 party-line vote, with support only from Democrats, now heads to the state Assembly for consideration.

Republicans and the National Rifle Association have vowed to campaign against it.

Why have Democrats suddenly developed a soft spot for criminals convicted of gun crimes? The bill’s author, state Sen. Steve Bradford, D-Gardena, says that he was motivated to write the bill after a 17-year-old riding in a car involved in a drive-by shooting was sentenced to 25 years in prison, even though he claims that he wasn’t the one who pulled the trigger.

and for all those anti-gunners who want to know where criminals get guns....well...this law lowers the prison time for those who give guns to criminals.....

Why is that?

Prop. 57, for example, very deceptively and fundamentally changed the definition of what constitutes a “non-violent” offense.


supplying a firearm to a gang member,

l
felon obtaining a firearm,

discharging a firearm on school grounds

Gun nuts want to arm kids 3 to 11 years old. You don't think that's nuts?

 

[grainbely]

It's idiots with guns.

What if they used a car?

Do you need to be learned the idiocy of your comparison for the hundredth time?

If it’s so idiotic why can’t you explain it?

Explain how a gun and a car are worlds apart to everyone except a deceitful pro gun paint chip eater?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

It's idiots with guns.

What if they used a car?

Only a gun nut would think that is a relevant remark.

Only an idiot gets banned every God damn week

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It's idiots with guns.

What if they used a car?

Do you need to be learned the idiocy of your comparison for the hundredth time?

If it’s so idiotic why can’t you explain it?

Explain how a gun and a car are worlds apart to everyone except a deceitful pro gun paint chip eater?

I can’t speak for a deceitful pro gun paint chip eater but a gun and a car are inanimate objects that require human operation in order to function whether the intent is good or nefarious.

 

[grainbely]

It's idiots with guns.

What if they used a car?

Do you need to be learned the idiocy of your comparison for the hundredth time?

If it’s so idiotic why can’t you explain it?

Explain how a gun and a car are worlds apart to everyone except a deceitful pro gun paint chip eater?

I can’t speak for a deceitful pro gun paint chip eater but a gun and a car are inanimate objects that require human operation in order to function whether the intent is good or nefarious.

Ok. If you consider them so similar then you won't mind if we require at least liability insurance on all guns to hedge against accidental, intentional, or irresponsible damages. You won't mind if we recategorize gun ownership as a privilege that can be revoked when the person proves they cant be trusted. You won't mind an extensive titling process for ALL sales and putting all gun ownership records in a database to be used by law enforcement when necessary. You won't mind if we tax aspects of gun ownership to pay for the real world impacts of their usage. Oh but wait...theres 2 narrow similarities so we should close our minds and ignore all this stuff.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

What if they used a car?

Do you need to be learned the idiocy of your comparison for the hundredth time?

If it’s so idiotic why can’t you explain it?

Explain how a gun and a car are worlds apart to everyone except a deceitful pro gun paint chip eater?

I can’t speak for a deceitful pro gun paint chip eater but a gun and a car are inanimate objects that require human operation in order to function whether the intent is good or nefarious.

Ok. If you consider them so similar then you won't mind if we require at least liability insurance on all guns to hedge against accidental, intentional, or irresponsible damages. You won't mind if we recategorize gun ownership as a privilege that can be revoked when the person proves they cant be trusted. You won't mind an extensive titling process for ALL sales and putting all gun ownership records in a database to be used by law enforcement when necessary. You won't mind if we tax aspects of gun ownership to pay for the real world impacts of their usage. Oh but wait...theres 2 narrow similarities so we should close our minds and ignore all this stuff.

The problem with your analogy is that those vehicle restrictions apply to use on public roads. You can do probably more with a car on private property than you can with a registered gun.

 

[2aguy]

What if they used a car?

Only a gun nut would think that is a relevant remark.

Tell that to the people in Nice, France where the muslim terrorist used a rental truck to murder 86 people and injured 435....in 5 minutes...... a lot cheaper way to commit mass murder than a gun......

Typical gun nut figuring out the lowest cost-per-death. You sign up for a special plan where you can kill two at the regular price, and get one free?

Typical left wing asshat who blames the gun and not the shooter....who supports the democrats who keep letting violent criminals, repeat gun offenders, out of jail who then go on to commit murder....and then frigid the asshat complains that they used a gun........ When if they had been kept in jail, the victim would still be alive... but live victims don't work for frigid, he needs dead people to get his gun bans passed..

There are more than enough dead people, and as long as the NRA fights for the ability of crazies and thugs to buy all the guns they want, we will have even more dead people. England doesn't kill nearly as many as we do. We should copy what they are doing.

Those doing the killing are in democrat controlled cities, in democrat controlled neighborhoods. The NRA Fights to put violent criminals in jail, while the democrat party keeps fighting to reduce the sentences of repeat, violent gun offenders....they keep letting violent killers free who then, surprisingly, go out and kill people....

The criminals are already barred from buying ,owning and carrying guns, the problem is that democrats keep letting them out after they are caught.

Why is that? Care to explain?

The democrats in Baltimore...... where they want repeat gun offenders released..

Maryland's new crime bill is a start, but remains weak tea




Much of the opposition came from Baltimore, where a majority of the delegation voted no.

A couple of things to note in here. First, the bill passed by a wide margin in the Senate (still needs House approval) but almost all of the opposition came from the state senators from the Baltimore area.

-----

Sadly, even if this makes it into law it’s missing some key items. They’re increasing penalties for repeat gun offenders, but not for first-time gun crimes. As their own police have said repeatedly, the key to curbing these trends is to get to the gang members when they are young and try to turn them away from violence at the first signs of trouble. Giving shooters a slap on the wrist doesn’t send a very powerful message.

They also rejected the Governor’s call for increased mandatory minimums for gun crimes.

 

[2aguy]

What if they used a car?

Only a gun nut would think that is a relevant remark.

Tell that to the people in Nice, France where the muslim terrorist used a rental truck to murder 86 people and injured 435....in 5 minutes...... a lot cheaper way to commit mass murder than a gun......

Typical gun nut figuring out the lowest cost-per-death. You sign up for a special plan where you can kill two at the regular price, and get one free?

Typical left wing asshat who blames the gun and not the shooter....who supports the democrats who keep letting violent criminals, repeat gun offenders, out of jail who then go on to commit murder....and then frigid the asshat complains that they used a gun........ When if they had been kept in jail, the victim would still be alive... but live victims don't work for frigid, he needs dead people to get his gun bans passed..

There are more than enough dead people, and as long as the NRA fights for the ability of crazies and thugs to buy all the guns they want, we will have even more dead people. England doesn't kill nearly as many as we do. We should copy what they are doing.

Democrat lets repeat gun offender out.....in Chicago, another democrat controlled shooting gallery..

John Boch: Lock Them Up! - The Truth About Guns

When you lock up violent criminals, you prevent them from victimizing other innocents. Crime in America dipped almost 50%after America abandoned “soft on crime” attitudes of the 1970s. Of course, many soft-on-crime politicians like Reitz have once more taken a love to “diversion” programs. And that’s how we get Robbie Patton (above), a local crime celebrity of sorts.

In 2015, he had an altercation at a Champaign Steak ‘n Shake restaurant commonly frequented by my friends and me. While none of us were enjoying a milkshake or steakburger at 5:30pm, Robbie was.

Robbie found himself in an altercation inside the restaurant. He felt one of his friends had been “disrespected”, so little Robbie went outside. He waited for the other group to emerge, pulled out of gun and tried to kill those other people.

He missed, and fled the scene with an Illinois State Trooper in hot pursuit. After a short, high-speed chase in a stolen car, Robbie crashed and escaped on foot.

Cops caught up with him. Local prosecutor Julia Reitz then went soft on little Robbie. She let him go to “boot camp”, even though that sentencing option is not supposed to be available for violent offenders. And squeezing off a bunch of shots at other people, trying to kill them, pretty much fits the bill as a violent crime.

After serving eight months on an eight-year sentence, Robbie returned to the streets of Champaign-Urbana. In less than two days, cops arrested him again for drugs and who knows what else. Not even three weeks after that, he’s illegally got agun. When someone “disrespects” another one of Robbie’s friends, guess what he does? He pulls out the gun and fires shots at those he believes responsible.




He misses his intended targets, but in the busy University of Illinois campustown district, his errant, not-so-late-night rounds found four innocent people within a block or two. George Korchev, the recent nursing school graduate due to start his career as a registered nurse at a hospital in Libertyville, IL, the following Monday morning, was struck and killed a blockaway from one of Robbie’s bullets.

 

[2aguy]

What if they used a car?

Only a gun nut would think that is a relevant remark.

Tell that to the people in Nice, France where the muslim terrorist used a rental truck to murder 86 people and injured 435....in 5 minutes...... a lot cheaper way to commit mass murder than a gun......

Typical gun nut figuring out the lowest cost-per-death. You sign up for a special plan where you can kill two at the regular price, and get one free?

Typical left wing asshat who blames the gun and not the shooter....who supports the democrats who keep letting violent criminals, repeat gun offenders, out of jail who then go on to commit murder....and then frigid the asshat complains that they used a gun........ When if they had been kept in jail, the victim would still be alive... but live victims don't work for frigid, he needs dead people to get his gun bans passed..

There are more than enough dead people, and as long as the NRA fights for the ability of crazies and thugs to buy all the guns they want, we will have even more dead people. England doesn't kill nearly as many as we do. We should copy what they are doing.

Democrats, not the NRA are responsible for gun murder in our democrat controlled cities...

California Democrats hate the gun, not the gunman – Orange County Register

Now that Democrats have supermajorities in the California state Legislature, they’ve rolled into Sacramento with a zest for lowering the state’s prison population and have interpreted St. Augustine’s words of wisdom to mean, “Hate the gun, not the gunman.”

I say this because, once they finally took a break from preaching about the benefits of stricter gun control, the state Senate voted to loosen sentencing guidelines for criminals convicted of gun crimes.

Currently, California law requires anyone who uses a gun while committing a felony to have their sentence increased by 10 years or more in prison — on top of the normal criminal penalty. If enacted, Senate Bill 620 would eliminate that mandate.

The bill, which passed on a 22-14 party-line vote, with support only from Democrats, now heads to the state Assembly for consideration.

Republicans and the National Rifle Association have vowed to campaign against it.

Why have Democrats suddenly developed a soft spot for criminals convicted of gun crimes? The bill’s author, state Sen. Steve Bradford, D-Gardena, says that he was motivated to write the bill after a 17-year-old riding in a car involved in a drive-by shooting was sentenced to 25 years in prison, even though he claims that he wasn’t the one who pulled the trigger.



Prop. 57, for example, very deceptively and fundamentally changed the definition of what constitutes a “non-violent” offense.


supplying a firearm to a gang member,

l
felon obtaining a firearm,

discharging a firearm on school grounds

 

[2aguy]

What if they used a car?

Do you need to be learned the idiocy of your comparison for the hundredth time?

If it’s so idiotic why can’t you explain it?

Explain how a gun and a car are worlds apart to everyone except a deceitful pro gun paint chip eater?

I can’t speak for a deceitful pro gun paint chip eater but a gun and a car are inanimate objects that require human operation in order to function whether the intent is good or nefarious.

Ok. If you consider them so similar then you won't mind if we require at least liability insurance on all guns to hedge against accidental, intentional, or irresponsible damages. You won't mind if we recategorize gun ownership as a privilege that can be revoked when the person proves they cant be trusted. You won't mind an extensive titling process for ALL sales and putting all gun ownership records in a database to be used by law enforcement when necessary. You won't mind if we tax aspects of gun ownership to pay for the real world impacts of their usage. Oh but wait...theres 2 narrow similarities so we should close our minds and ignore all this stuff.

Nope..... any fee on the Right to own or carry a gun is unConstitutional....and will be exploited by people like you to keep the poor from exercising their Right to keep and bear arms. People like you in the past, democrats, used Poll Taxes to keep Blacks from voting...that was found unConstitutional.....so nope, no fees.

Gun ownership is a Right, you twit. And we know why you twits want gun registration.....you will use any registration list to ban and confiscate guns when you get the power to do it.

Just like your democrat buddies after slavery used Poll Taxes and Literacy tests to keep Blacks from voting, you want to use tests and fees to keep the poor, and Blacks, from owning guns.......

Does it ever get old trying to keep people from having Rights? Or is it just part of who you are?

 

[2aguy]

It's idiots with guns.

What if they used a car?

Do you need to be learned the idiocy of your comparison for the hundredth time?

If it’s so idiotic why can’t you explain it?

Explain how a gun and a car are worlds apart to everyone except a deceitful pro gun paint chip eater?

Gun ownership is a Right..... owning a car is not.... so an ignorant gun grabber like yourself, who worships the totalitarian state wouldn't understand the concept of inalienable Right. This is why we have the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, the Founders saw nut jobs like you coming along all the way back to the Founding......

 

[grainbely]

Do you need to be learned the idiocy of your comparison for the hundredth time?

If it’s so idiotic why can’t you explain it?

Explain how a gun and a car are worlds apart to everyone except a deceitful pro gun paint chip eater?

I can’t speak for a deceitful pro gun paint chip eater but a gun and a car are inanimate objects that require human operation in order to function whether the intent is good or nefarious.

Ok. If you consider them so similar then you won't mind if we require at least liability insurance on all guns to hedge against accidental, intentional, or irresponsible damages. You won't mind if we recategorize gun ownership as a privilege that can be revoked when the person proves they cant be trusted. You won't mind an extensive titling process for ALL sales and putting all gun ownership records in a database to be used by law enforcement when necessary. You won't mind if we tax aspects of gun ownership to pay for the real world impacts of their usage. Oh but wait...theres 2 narrow similarities so we should close our minds and ignore all this stuff.

The problem with your analogy is that those vehicle restrictions apply to use on public roads. You can do probably more with a car on private property than you can with a registered gun.

Ok. You admit there is far more difference than you originally said. Theres another distinction to be made on your latest comment. The cars are heavily restricted on public roads. Then maybe guns should be as well. If you want to carry in public then apply all the same restrictions. When you get back to your property you can stick your gun where ever you ache to have it.

 

[karpenter]

What if they used a car?

Only a gun nut would think that is a relevant remark.

Nope
Islamists Were Promoting It
Truck Ramming Was Quite The Fad In Europe For A Bit

 

[WTP]

It's idiots with guns.

Why do we allow idiots to have guns then?