oreo
Gold Member
Immie are you really going to claim that because the definition of the term I read and provided said nothing about not admitting guilt and in fact implied it was a type of avoidance of monitary outlay was what I based the statement on it means the Republican party did not break teh law?
No, I am going to rely on the court ordered Consent Decree that says NO FINDINGS OF GUILT and NO ADMISSION OF GUILT.
When I see some court documents that find the Republican Party guilty of a crime, I will be more than happy to condemn them. When I see some court documents that find the Democratic Party guilty of a crime, I will be more than happy to condemn them.
I am not going to condemn the Republican Party simply because your party decided to file a lawsuit that they could not support.
Immie
So the fact that they broke the law and the evidence in the case is clear cut means nothing to you huh?
BTY ACORN has never admitted guilt either and never been convicted either.
You still pretend they did something
We have ACORN representatives on VIDEO--and you have a lot of baseless accusations--
We have a video of the black panthers intimidating whites at a precinct.
Exactly who--(what person) was intimidated by a Republican--and exactly who was the Republican that actually stopped a black voter from voting? The reason the court has decided in this manner--is because there is no evidence of it that can be substantiated.
Anyone can "accuse" anyone--but it's the evidence that has to be there--and this thread has none.