PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #21
Can you please explain this to a psychiatrist, who can process the info and hopefully allow you to get on with your lifeI have asked several times why they find it so difficult to recognize that Darwin's theory may not be the answer to evolution.
Here, from Richard Dawkins, English ethologist, evolutionary biologist....and strident atheist, is the real answer:
"Although atheism might have been logically tenable before Darwin, Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist."
Without Darwin, atheism, secularism...and Marxism... fall apart.
That's the context.
Most interesting is how upset your sort gets when your indoctrination is questioned.
Nor, it appears, are you equipped to answer questions about what upset you.
Another chance?
Let's see what it is about the OP that has gotten under your scale.
1. Should we believe all who are called scientists?
2. Was Stephen Jay Gould a famous popularizer and supporter of Darwinian Evolution?
3. Has Darwin's theory been proven?
4. Is that theory taught in government school as a fact? Do you accept it as such?
5. Is there any importance to Gould and other supporter of Darwinism being a Marxist?
6. Do you have any objection to Marxism?
7. Is it an accident that no mention of Gould's political views occurs?
8. You appear incensed. What, actually, produced your ire when reading the OP?