I
Indofred
Guest
- Thread starter
- #101
I did not - it's just your reading comprehension is well below standard.
Really? Then explain this please:
Yes, Indonesia had a dictator installed by the United States.
First, you bombed civilians, then you sponsored yet another pet dictator.
Now please make this mesh with 1953, and the reign of Sukarno.
Please, let me know how my (or anybodies) comprehension can take anything from this other then Sukarno (1945-1967) was a US sponsored "pet dictator".
Please, give us some kind of confirmation to back up this claim, which I have been asking you for several pages now. But instead of simply backing up your claim (which I posted in full above), you simply go on more rants and throw around insults.
Where does it say the two were close together?
At no point did I suggest the two events directly followed each other.
Then
adverb
1.
at that time; at the time in question.
"I was living in Cairo then"
synonyms: at that time, in those days; More
2.
after that; next; afterward.
"she won the first and then the second game"
synonyms: next, after that, afterward/afterwards, subsequently, later More
See, in that use, it means, later.
You engaged in terrorist attacks in an attempt to remove the president of the time and, some years later, you supported a dictator; one guilty of mass murder and massive corruption.
Now, please go on to explain how murdering civilians in an Indonesian market place assisted America in any way.
That's why you're trying to derail by going on about semantics - you have to avoid the main point - America's terrorist group, the CIA, murdered civilians, and still does.
Now, explain this attack and tell me the reasons why it happened and, most importantly, how killing people on their way to church, defended America.
Last edited by a moderator: