Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?

[EMH]

You may be insane.

If he could refute it, he would try.

He doesn't try because he cannot.

 

[ding]

Antarctica and Greenland both grew ice through all your bullshit "interglacials," and the ice cores prove it, and you simply don't like the truth that the bullshit you push is that easily refuted...

Tell me how land moves back and forth over the poles?

 

[ding]

If he could refute it, he would try.

He doesn't try because he cannot.

Do you live in some sort of institutionalized home?

 

[EMH]

Tell me how land moves back and forth over the poles?

The tectonic history is quite clear. The plates do not "move back and forth." The center bottom of the Atlantic is expanding every year, pushing NA SW and Greenland NW. There is no "quick reverse" and you are a moron to believe that...

 

[ding]

The tectonic history is quite clear. The plates do not "move back and forth." The center bottom of the Atlantic is expanding every year, pushing NA SW and Greenland NW. There is no "quick reverse" and you are a moron to believe that...

They must because oxygen isotopes from the seafloor and ice cores say they must. That is if land over the polar regions is really what's causing ice at the poles, right?

It's like that land is dancing to an Elvis tune, huh, cause it's moving back and forth like his hips. Amirite?

 

[EMH]

They must because oxygen isotopes from the seafloor and ice cores say they must. That is if land over the polar regions is really what's causing ice at the poles, right?

No, it actually gets less energy from the Sun. That is why it is warmer at the Equator than the poles.

Go back to 4th grade now...

 

[ding]

No, it actually gets less energy from the Sun. That is why it is warmer at the Equator than the poles.

Go back to 4th grade now...

The polar regions always gets less energy from the sun. That never changes. Just seasonal changes is all.

So you are back to land moving back and forth like Elvis' hips. Unless you are saying glacial periods are seasonal. Is that what you are saying? Is it that or Elvis' hips?

 

[EMH]

The polar regions always gets less energy from the sun. That never changes. Just seasonal changes is all.

So you are back to land moving back and forth like Elvis' hips.

Yes, but LAND changes that, from sea ice to 8 million cubic miles of ice on Antarctica.

Why is the Antarctic Circle on average 50F colder than the Arctic?

 

[ding]

Yes, but LAND changes that, from sea ice to 8 million cubic miles of ice on Antarctica.

Why is the Antarctic Circle on average 50F colder than the Arctic?

According to you it's because land is moving back and forth like Elvis' hips.

 

[EMH]

According to you it's because land is moving back and forth like Elvis' hips.

Lie

Greenland 2 million years ago no ice except mountains.

Greenland center went forest to ice age 400k-800k years ago.

Vikings forced off the southern tip in the 1400s.

The Greenland ice age started 1-2 million years ago at the northernmost point, and moved south at about a mile every thousand years. During that time, Greenland's plate moved in one direction, NW, continually, and you have no evidence suggesting otherwise...

 

[ding]

Lie

Greenland 2 million years ago no ice except mountains.

Greenland center went forest to ice age 400k-800k years ago.

Vikings forced off the southern tip in the 1400s.

The Greenland ice age started 1-2 million years ago at the northernmost point, and moved south at about a mile every thousand years. During that time, Greenland's plate moved in one direction, NW, continually, and you have no evidence suggesting otherwise...

So land moving back and forth?

 

[EMH]

So land moving back and forth?

Having trouble with your HEBREW TO ENGLISH translation software again...

or is your reading comp simply stuck at the second grade level??

 

[ding]

EMH's theory of glacial cycles is land moving back and forth over the polar regions like Elvis' hips.

 

[ding]

Having trouble with your HEBREW TO ENGLISH translation software again...

or is your reading comp simply stuck at the second grade level??

 

[toobfreak]

what does that ^^^^ mean. There is no question in my mind that variation in
levels of CO2 have profound effects ON THE GLOBAL SYSTEM. CO2 is a huge issue
in all living systems-----we is-----as noted on some Star Trek episode long ago
"SIX CARBON UNITS" Even the fishes of the sea are "SIX CARBON UNITS"----
all the way down to the amebas

News flash for ya, Rosie, for the most part, carbon is a fairly neutral and inert compound. And as to CO2, that is just a trace gas and a very weak GHG! You should be far more concerned for water vapor--- not only is water a reactant and GHG component, but there is more than six times as much water vapor in our air than there is CO2!

 

[Dagosa]

Why is there more "snow ice" in the Antarctic vs the Arctic?

Because snows there…..dah and the Arctic Ocean melts the snow. Snow ice occurs after it snows, and subjected to pressure…..

The Arctic is warmer because it’s at sea level and the ocean helps warm the surface. Dah. It’s also warmer because because Antarctica is at a higher elevation which tend to be cooler…..dah. Foolish,