Votto
Diamond Member
- Oct 31, 2012
- 63,067
- 68,555
- 3,605

The American Psychological Association Is Waging War on Men and Boys
Is it possible to be sexist toward men? Sure; the APA have proved it so.

The Left is obsessed with destroying the Patriarchal family, about as much as they are obsessed with destroying women's sports by allowing men to compete in them and forcing young girls to share a bathroom with males in your local school. In fact, you could say that the Left is at war with humanity in general, but this article highlights how the Left is trying to destroy masculinity in particular.
The Left does this by taking over our institutions and defiling them with their ideology and propaganda continuously. They have done so with the media to such an extent, that most people no longer trust Legacy media as they have become worse than Pravda, telling us such blatant lies that President Biden was fully competent to be President, and then later having a silent coup to replace him because of his dementia, only to leave him in power until his term was up anyway that defied all logic and reason as to why they replaced him for the Presidential nomination in the first place. In short, Legacy media is officially dead.
But the Left has done the same to science as this article suggests as it lists all masculine traits as "toxic" and "unhealthy".
By releasing practice guidelines that misrepresent the science, the APA does harm to public trust in science. If the public increasingly believes—for good reasons or bad—that science is political nonsense, giving the public exactly that is poor strategy.
Ethically too, the APA has an obligation not to promote prejudice or discrimination against any group. Though the APA has historically failed on this score in relation to women and non-white ethnicities, this is no excuse for the APA to now evince what appears to me to be a clearly bigoted attitude toward traditional men.
And I got to thinking, this is one of the reasons the Left continually refers to Trump as a fascist. When they see a male leader who demonstrates male traits of assertiveness and aggression and leadership, they instantly accuse that person of being Hitler. After all, Hitler is the male poster boy for all perceived male toxicity. Instead, we see from the leadership on the Left weak male role models who are either not very smart or are suffering from dementia, along with women who are dumber than a box of rocks who are hyperaggressive but tactically too stupid to really have it benefit them politically.
And the irony of it all is that the Left is promoting women to transform into men at the same time, but why if male toxicity is so horrible? They then pump testosterone into transforming women who are angry and confused as a baseline because of their condition and perceived hostility towards their condition, and wonder why a large number of them become mass shooters thanks to how those hormones that are being pumped into them help trigger them to act violently, something that is completely foreign to them.