$ecular#eckler
Platinum Member
Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution. It goes on and on because political science is not a science. Some colleges call it "government studies," but it is all the same - none of the scholars are sophisticated enough to critique the Three-part Separation Theory.
The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system.
The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislative branch stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into the society including the judicial servants. The erroneous governing system causes political chaos that trickles down into society because that is why we institute government - to guide society.
Even if the government were to reach political order, and society is peaceful, the perpetual election cycle is going to destroy that, because the system is not designed to manage the elected offices when new laws are not necessary. The candidates have to campaign for change because they cannot campaign for "no new laws," because then the citizenry would question the need for politicians.
The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the checks and balances prevent corruption or control the quality of the inevitable oligarchy created in the echelons of the government. The checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a simple three-branch separation model because the three branches are inherently cooperative entities for the stable administration of civil law; legislate, execute, and review.
The American charter system was inaccurately deployed, consequently, justice was established in unamendable error, domestic tranquility has since been forfeited, and the remaining parameters for the American Experiment; defense, general welfare, and liberty, are all at risk, as well.
Attached is a map for a six-part separation and a treatise
The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system.
The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislative branch stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into the society including the judicial servants. The erroneous governing system causes political chaos that trickles down into society because that is why we institute government - to guide society.
Even if the government were to reach political order, and society is peaceful, the perpetual election cycle is going to destroy that, because the system is not designed to manage the elected offices when new laws are not necessary. The candidates have to campaign for change because they cannot campaign for "no new laws," because then the citizenry would question the need for politicians.
The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the checks and balances prevent corruption or control the quality of the inevitable oligarchy created in the echelons of the government. The checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a simple three-branch separation model because the three branches are inherently cooperative entities for the stable administration of civil law; legislate, execute, and review.
The American charter system was inaccurately deployed, consequently, justice was established in unamendable error, domestic tranquility has since been forfeited, and the remaining parameters for the American Experiment; defense, general welfare, and liberty, are all at risk, as well.
Attached is a map for a six-part separation and a treatise
Attachments
Last edited: