The Constitution is Junk

$ecular#eckler

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2020
Messages
4,258
Reaction score
2,597
Points
938
Location
Transient
Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution. It goes on and on because political science is not a science. Some colleges call it "government studies," but it is all the same - none of the scholars are sophisticated enough to critique the Three-part Separation Theory.

The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system.

The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislative branch stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into the society including the judicial servants. The erroneous governing system causes political chaos that trickles down into society because that is why we institute government - to guide society.

Even if the government were to reach political order, and society is peaceful, the perpetual election cycle is going to destroy that, because the system is not designed to manage the elected offices when new laws are not necessary. The candidates have to campaign for change because they cannot campaign for "no new laws," because then the citizenry would question the need for politicians.

The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the checks and balances prevent corruption or control the quality of the inevitable oligarchy created in the echelons of the government. The checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a simple three-branch separation model because the three branches are inherently cooperative entities for the stable administration of civil law; legislate, execute, and review.

The American charter system was inaccurately deployed, consequently, justice was established in unamendable error, domestic tranquility has since been forfeited, and the remaining parameters for the American Experiment; defense, general welfare, and liberty, are all at risk, as well.

Attached is a map for a six-part separation and a treatise
 

Attachments

  • Einstein_study - Explain_it_Simply.webp
    Einstein_study - Explain_it_Simply.webp
    35.7 KB · Views: 20
  • SLCS.US4CC.map.webp
    SLCS.US4CC.map.webp
    71.5 KB · Views: 8
  • SLCS.US4CC.Introduction_25-02-14.pdf
    SLCS.US4CC.Introduction_25-02-14.pdf
    1 MB · Views: 1
Last edited:
Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution.
We're just waiting for you to provide us with a better arrangement! Remember, the Constitution was arrived at democratically through mutual agreement, so even if you dream up as better system, if it is only your idea agreed upon by you, then it would be monarchical.

The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship.
That is the entire point of it.
 
Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution. It goes on and on because political science is not a science. Some colleges call it "government studies," but it is all the same - none of the scholars are sophisticated enough to critique the Three-part Separation Theory.

The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system.

The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislative branch stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into the society including the judicial servants. The erroneous governing system causes political chaos that trickles down into society because that is why we institute government - to guide society.

Even if the government were to reach political order, and society is peaceful, the perpetual election cycle is going to destroy that, because the system is not designed to manage the elected offices when new laws are not necessary. The candidates have to campaign for change because they cannot campaign for "no new laws," because then the citizenry would question the need for politicians.

The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the checks and balances prevent corruption or control the quality of the inevitable oligarchy created in the echelons of the government. The checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a simple three-branch separation model because the three branches are inherently cooperative entities for the stable administration of civil law; legislate, execute, and review.

The American charter system was inaccurately deployed, consequently, justice was established in unamendable error, domestic tranquility has since been forfeited, and the remaining parameters for the American Experiment; defense, general welfare, and liberty, are all at risk, as well.
mapped-oldest-democracies.jpg


Interesting.

Why would anyone listen to someone so clueless about that success of the US Constitution?


1739654097103.webp
 
Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution. It goes on and on because political science is not a science. Some colleges call it "government studies," but it is all the same - none of the scholars are sophisticated enough to critique the Three-part Separation Theory.

The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system.

The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislative branch stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into the society including the judicial servants. The erroneous governing system causes political chaos that trickles down into society because that is why we institute government - to guide society.

Even if the government were to reach political order, and society is peaceful, the perpetual election cycle is going to destroy that, because the system is not designed to manage the elected offices when new laws are not necessary. The candidates have to campaign for change because they cannot campaign for "no new laws," because then the citizenry would question the need for politicians.

The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the checks and balances prevent corruption or control the quality of the inevitable oligarchy created in the echelons of the government. The checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a simple three-branch separation model because the three branches are inherently cooperative entities for the stable administration of civil law; legislate, execute, and review.

The American charter system was inaccurately deployed, consequently, justice was established in unamendable error, domestic tranquility has since been forfeited, and the remaining parameters for the American Experiment; defense, general welfare, and liberty, are all at risk, as well.
Verbose ^ but not especially intelligent.
 
Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution. It goes on and on because political science is not a science. Some colleges call it "government studies," but it is all the same - none of the scholars are sophisticated enough to critique the Three-part Separation Theory.

The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system.

The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislative branch stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into the society including the judicial servants. The erroneous governing system causes political chaos that trickles down into society because that is why we institute government - to guide society.

Even if the government were to reach political order, and society is peaceful, the perpetual election cycle is going to destroy that, because the system is not designed to manage the elected offices when new laws are not necessary. The candidates have to campaign for change because they cannot campaign for "no new laws," because then the citizenry would question the need for politicians.

The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the checks and balances prevent corruption or control the quality of the inevitable oligarchy created in the echelons of the government. The checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a simple three-branch separation model because the three branches are inherently cooperative entities for the stable administration of civil law; legislate, execute, and review.

The American charter system was inaccurately deployed, consequently, justice was established in unamendable error, domestic tranquility has since been forfeited, and the remaining parameters for the American Experiment; defense, general welfare, and liberty, are all at risk, as well.
Well, it's the longest existing system of government in the world. So I think we'll stick with it.
 
Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution. It goes on and on because political science is not a science. Some colleges call it "government studies," but it is all the same - none of the scholars are sophisticated enough to critique the Three-part Separation Theory.

The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system.

The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislative branch stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into the society including the judicial servants. The erroneous governing system causes political chaos that trickles down into society because that is why we institute government - to guide society.

Even if the government were to reach political order, and society is peaceful, the perpetual election cycle is going to destroy that, because the system is not designed to manage the elected offices when new laws are not necessary. The candidates have to campaign for change because they cannot campaign for "no new laws," because then the citizenry would question the need for politicians.

The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the checks and balances prevent corruption or control the quality of the inevitable oligarchy created in the echelons of the government. The checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a simple three-branch separation model because the three branches are inherently cooperative entities for the stable administration of civil law; legislate, execute, and review.

The American charter system was inaccurately deployed, consequently, justice was established in unamendable error, domestic tranquility has since been forfeited, and the remaining parameters for the American Experiment; defense, general welfare, and liberty, are all at risk, as well.
What country do you live in?
 
Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution. It goes on and on because political science is not a science. Some colleges call it "government studies," but it is all the same - none of the scholars are sophisticated enough to critique the Three-part Separation Theory.

The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system.

The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislative branch stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into the society including the judicial servants. The erroneous governing system causes political chaos that trickles down into society because that is why we institute government - to guide society.

Even if the government were to reach political order, and society is peaceful, the perpetual election cycle is going to destroy that, because the system is not designed to manage the elected offices when new laws are not necessary. The candidates have to campaign for change because they cannot campaign for "no new laws," because then the citizenry would question the need for politicians.

The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the checks and balances prevent corruption or control the quality of the inevitable oligarchy created in the echelons of the government. The checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a simple three-branch separation model because the three branches are inherently cooperative entities for the stable administration of civil law; legislate, execute, and review.

The American charter system was inaccurately deployed, consequently, justice was established in unamendable error, domestic tranquility has since been forfeited, and the remaining parameters for the American Experiment; defense, general welfare, and liberty, are all at risk, as well.
Thank God you brought this to our attention.

I'm a commie now!
 
Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution. It goes on and on because political science is not a science. Some colleges call it "government studies," but it is all the same - none of the scholars are sophisticated enough to critique the Three-part Separation Theory.

The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system.

The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislative branch stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into the society including the judicial servants. The erroneous governing system causes political chaos that trickles down into society because that is why we institute government - to guide society.

Even if the government were to reach political order, and society is peaceful, the perpetual election cycle is going to destroy that, because the system is not designed to manage the elected offices when new laws are not necessary. The candidates have to campaign for change because they cannot campaign for "no new laws," because then the citizenry would question the need for politicians.

The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the checks and balances prevent corruption or control the quality of the inevitable oligarchy created in the echelons of the government. The checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a simple three-branch separation model because the three branches are inherently cooperative entities for the stable administration of civil law; legislate, execute, and review.

The American charter system was inaccurately deployed, consequently, justice was established in unamendable error, domestic tranquility has since been forfeited, and the remaining parameters for the American Experiment; defense, general welfare, and liberty, are all at risk, as well.

Attached is a map for a six-part separation and a treatise
It's out-of-date.
 
Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution. It goes on and on because political science is not a science. Some colleges call it "government studies," but it is all the same - none of the scholars are sophisticated enough to critique the Three-part Separation Theory.

The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system.

The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislative branch stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into the society including the judicial servants. The erroneous governing system causes political chaos that trickles down into society because that is why we institute government - to guide society.

Even if the government were to reach political order, and society is peaceful, the perpetual election cycle is going to destroy that, because the system is not designed to manage the elected offices when new laws are not necessary. The candidates have to campaign for change because they cannot campaign for "no new laws," because then the citizenry would question the need for politicians.

The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the checks and balances prevent corruption or control the quality of the inevitable oligarchy created in the echelons of the government. The checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a simple three-branch separation model because the three branches are inherently cooperative entities for the stable administration of civil law; legislate, execute, and review.

The American charter system was inaccurately deployed, consequently, justice was established in unamendable error, domestic tranquility has since been forfeited, and the remaining parameters for the American Experiment; defense, general welfare, and liberty, are all at risk, as well.

Attached is a map for a six-part separation and a treatise
good luck 2.gif
 
We're just waiting for you to provide us with a better arrangement! Remember, the Constitution was arrived at democratically through mutual agreement, so even if you dream up as better system, if it is only your idea agreed upon by you, then it would be monarchical.

No. What ever I design still has to go through a convention deliberation, validation, auxillary validation, and then a ratification tally.
That is the entire point of it.
No. The entire point of it is listed in the Preamble - genius.

There is supposed to be a system of checks and balances that are supposed to prevent corruption, but as you can tell, after 248 years of exercising it, not only is there wide spread corruption, but there are incapacitated people being elected into the system.

You and everyone else cannot figure out why that is.
 
Back
Top Bottom