cbirch2
Active Member
- Jul 9, 2011
- 1,394
- 49
- 36
So you trust something that constantly proves itself wrong over something that science has yet to have been able to prove is wrong.
Just because you make a statement doent mean it is assumed true until proved false. Its presumed false until it can be proved true. And then its always able to be proved false, if scientists are able to. When you say "god exists", its on you to provide evidence that it exists, not on me to prove it doesnt. I cant prove that something doesnt exist if you cant prove it does.
Science doesnt propose an idea without evidence. Once an idea is proposed its just an idea until more evidence can be supported. Then other scientists attempt to prove it wrong. If it cant be proved wrong it becomes more accepted. The longer it lasts, the more accepted.
How does that not sound like solid logic. Evolution hasnt been proved wrong once in 150 years.
There is a big difference between evolution and man evolving from a common ancestory to other species. Religion wouldn't argue that men have evolved over time. That has never been in dispute.
Religion hasn't been proved wrong for many millenium![]()
Because it hasnt been support by facts. Before science attempts to prove something wrong it has to be supported by facts to even be considered plausible in the first place. You dont even meet the fist criteria.