The DNC is the biggest threat to democracy, bar none

[Votto]

As we have recently learned, organizations like USAID have been used to subvert the media as a talking head for the DNC using taxpayer money.

USAID’s funding of over 6,000 journalists, 1,000 platforms worldwide raises concerns over independence and transparency

The U.S. government, through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), has been a significant funder of over 6,200 journalists across 707 media outlets and 279 media NGOs, including major organizations like Politico, the Associated Press and BBC, with 90 percent of reporting from...

www.newstarget.com

• The U.S. government, through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), has been a significant funder of over 6,200 journalists across 707 media outlets and 279 media NGOs, including major organizations like Politico, the Associated Press and BBC, with 90 percent of reporting from Ukraine being supported.
• This funding raises concerns about media independence and integrity, as critics argue it may lead to media narratives favoring U.S. interests, while independent outlets are being marginalized or shut down.
• Many media organizations are reluctant to disclose their government funding due to fears of financial and political repercussions, complicating efforts to assess the full impact on the media landscape.

A recent report has unveiled that the United States government has been funding prominent media outlets such as Politico, the Associated Press and BBC, raising significant questions about the independence and integrity of these news organizations.



The report, which cites data from Reporters Without Borders (RSF), indicates that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has been a substantial funder of over 6,200 journalists across 707 media outlets and 279 "media" NGOs, including 90 percent of the reportage out of Ukraine. This funding has been spread across various federal agencies, leading to concerns that the U.S. government may be influencing media narratives in favor of its own interests. (Related: Taxpayer dollars fueled Politico, NY Times as outlets pushed liberal narratives, records show.)



The implications of this funding are far-reaching. Critics argue that the U.S. government has effectively been propping up regime-friendly media, which then peddles regime-friendly coverage, while simultaneously attacking independent outlets such as ZeroHedge and The Federalist. This has led to a situation where many independent media organizations have been starved out of business, raising concerns about the diversity and reliability of news sources.

It is a media that hid the mental state of one Joe Biden, as voters then elected him as their nominee for President, thinking he was fit for another term. This is the same media that was told not to print anything about the Hunter Biden laptop because it was Russian disinformation, when it was a real story and a real scandal. In fact, about 20% of voters said they would not have voted for Biden had the media reported it and had they known.

Poll: 17% of Biden Voters Would Have Abandoned Him if They Knew About Stories the Media Censored

A new poll finds that 17 percent of Biden voters would have voted differently if they’d been given fair media coverage of both candidates.

www.westernjournal.com

But that is just about the media. Look what the DNC has done with Trump, trying to remove him from office by impeaching him twice, and then when he leaves office, charging with a myriad of crimes while putting a gag order on him so he could not campaign as he ran for reelection.

But they even removed their own duly elected nominee, Joe Biden, without so much as one vote.

There is no greater threat to democracy than the democrat party, not even close.

 

[kyzr]

I'm still waiting for Trump to get to the bottom of those two assassination attempts to see who ordered them.

 

[Votto]

I'm still waiting for Trump to get to the bottom of those two assassination attempts to see who ordered them.

I'm waiting for the cabal to try and find a clever way to remove him from office and turn the country into California, which is now a one state party.

Yea, democracy with only one political party

Yay.

 

[1srelluc]

I think the AG could easily build a case and have them declared a domestic terrorist .org just over child mutilation alone.

 

[Oddball]

As we have recently learned, organizations like USAID have been used to subvert the media as a talking head for the DNC using taxpayer money.

USAID’s funding of over 6,000 journalists, 1,000 platforms worldwide raises concerns over independence and transparency

The U.S. government, through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), has been a significant funder of over 6,200 journalists across 707 media outlets and 279 media NGOs, including major organizations like Politico, the Associated Press and BBC, with 90 percent of reporting from...

www.newstarget.com

• The U.S. government, through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), has been a significant funder of over 6,200 journalists across 707 media outlets and 279 media NGOs, including major organizations like Politico, the Associated Press and BBC, with 90 percent of reporting from Ukraine being supported.
• This funding raises concerns about media independence and integrity, as critics argue it may lead to media narratives favoring U.S. interests, while independent outlets are being marginalized or shut down.
• Many media organizations are reluctant to disclose their government funding due to fears of financial and political repercussions, complicating efforts to assess the full impact on the media landscape.

A recent report has unveiled that the United States government has been funding prominent media outlets such as Politico, the Associated Press and BBC, raising significant questions about the independence and integrity of these news organizations.



The report, which cites data from Reporters Without Borders (RSF), indicates that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has been a substantial funder of over 6,200 journalists across 707 media outlets and 279 "media" NGOs, including 90 percent of the reportage out of Ukraine. This funding has been spread across various federal agencies, leading to concerns that the U.S. government may be influencing media narratives in favor of its own interests. (Related: Taxpayer dollars fueled Politico, NY Times as outlets pushed liberal narratives, records show.)



The implications of this funding are far-reaching. Critics argue that the U.S. government has effectively been propping up regime-friendly media, which then peddles regime-friendly coverage, while simultaneously attacking independent outlets such as ZeroHedge and The Federalist. This has led to a situation where many independent media organizations have been starved out of business, raising concerns about the diversity and reliability of news sources.

View attachment 1076577

It is a media that hid the mental state of one Joe Biden, as voters then elected him as their nominee for President, thinking he was fit for another term. This is the same media that was told not to print anything about the Hunter Biden laptop because it was Russian disinformation, when it was a real story and a real scandal. In fact, about 20% of voters said they would not have voted for Biden had the media reported it and had they known.

Poll: 17% of Biden Voters Would Have Abandoned Him if They Knew About Stories the Media Censored

A new poll finds that 17 percent of Biden voters would have voted differently if they’d been given fair media coverage of both candidates.

www.westernjournal.com

But that is just about the media. Look what the DNC has done with Trump, trying to remove him from office by impeaching him twice, and then when he leaves office, charging with a myriad of crimes while putting a gag order on him so he could not campaign as he ran for reelection.

But they even removed their own duly elected nominee, Joe Biden, without so much as one vote.

There is no greater threat to democracy than the democrat party, not even close.

Politico dropped a big pearl clutching turd today....We're going back to Joe McCarthy!!

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/02/06/government-workers-purge-1950s-communism-00202336

 

[Independent thinker]

As we have recently learned, organizations like USAID have been used to subvert the media as a talking head for the DNC using taxpayer money.

USAID’s funding of over 6,000 journalists, 1,000 platforms worldwide raises concerns over independence and transparency

The U.S. government, through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), has been a significant funder of over 6,200 journalists across 707 media outlets and 279 media NGOs, including major organizations like Politico, the Associated Press and BBC, with 90 percent of reporting from...

www.newstarget.com

• The U.S. government, through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), has been a significant funder of over 6,200 journalists across 707 media outlets and 279 media NGOs, including major organizations like Politico, the Associated Press and BBC, with 90 percent of reporting from Ukraine being supported.
• This funding raises concerns about media independence and integrity, as critics argue it may lead to media narratives favoring U.S. interests, while independent outlets are being marginalized or shut down.
• Many media organizations are reluctant to disclose their government funding due to fears of financial and political repercussions, complicating efforts to assess the full impact on the media landscape.

A recent report has unveiled that the United States government has been funding prominent media outlets such as Politico, the Associated Press and BBC, raising significant questions about the independence and integrity of these news organizations.



The report, which cites data from Reporters Without Borders (RSF), indicates that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has been a substantial funder of over 6,200 journalists across 707 media outlets and 279 "media" NGOs, including 90 percent of the reportage out of Ukraine. This funding has been spread across various federal agencies, leading to concerns that the U.S. government may be influencing media narratives in favor of its own interests. (Related: Taxpayer dollars fueled Politico, NY Times as outlets pushed liberal narratives, records show.)



The implications of this funding are far-reaching. Critics argue that the U.S. government has effectively been propping up regime-friendly media, which then peddles regime-friendly coverage, while simultaneously attacking independent outlets such as ZeroHedge and The Federalist. This has led to a situation where many independent media organizations have been starved out of business, raising concerns about the diversity and reliability of news sources.

View attachment 1076577

It is a media that hid the mental state of one Joe Biden, as voters then elected him as their nominee for President, thinking he was fit for another term. This is the same media that was told not to print anything about the Hunter Biden laptop because it was Russian disinformation, when it was a real story and a real scandal. In fact, about 20% of voters said they would not have voted for Biden had the media reported it and had they known.

Poll: 17% of Biden Voters Would Have Abandoned Him if They Knew About Stories the Media Censored

A new poll finds that 17 percent of Biden voters would have voted differently if they’d been given fair media coverage of both candidates.

www.westernjournal.com

But that is just about the media. Look what the DNC has done with Trump, trying to remove him from office by impeaching him twice, and then when he leaves office, charging with a myriad of crimes while putting a gag order on him so he could not campaign as he ran for reelection.

But they even removed their own duly elected nominee, Joe Biden, without so much as one vote.

There is no greater threat to democracy than the democrat party, not even close.

CNN did a poll after the election that showed out of the voters who's number one reason for voting was to save democracy, 58% of those voters voted for Trump.

 

[Votto]

I think that when democrats say that their opposition party is anti-democracy, what they really mean this

Democrats think that there can only be democracy with democrats in power. Only with a one party system can you have democracy.

 

[toobfreak]

I'm still waiting for Trump to get to the bottom of those two assassination attempts to see who ordered them.

My money is on Nancy Pelosi.

 

[shockedcanadian]

The Dems are basically a fascimile of the entire Canadian political/covert system on both sides of the aisle, Lib or Con. You know that a politician wants to protect Canada, change our system of abuses and protect our future once the entire media attack him/her.

They destroy those who want the nation to succeed as long as a few fat cat elites get paid. When the economy collapses they will already have moved their currency into the next safehaven. I identified these signs long ago, I also advised you all to learn from Canada going back 25 years.

If the last four years in the U.S and the current whistleblowers and exposures don't encourage you to pay closer attention then you are slow learners.