The Economist Endorses Harris, Warns Trump Carries 'Unacceptable Risks'

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
180,136
119,824
2,645
Native America
1730394260756.png


"Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace" by electing Trump, the newspaper said.

The Economist has weighed in on the presidential race, warning that a second Trump presidency carries “an unacceptable risk to America and the world.”

“By making Mr Trump leader of the free world, Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace,” the weekly newspaper said in an editorial published Thursday that endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president. “If The Economist had a vote, we would cast it for Ms Harris.”

“Even when Mr Trump behaved abominably by fomenting an attack on the Capitol to try to stop the transfer of power on January 6th 2021, America’s institutions held firm,” the paper said.

But his second presidency would likely be very different, the outlet warned.

More at the link below...

The Economist Endorses Harris, Warns Trump Carries 'Unacceptable Risks'

Great news! I sincerely thank The Economist! What do you think?
 
Last edited:
"Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace" by electing Trump, the newspaper said.
By reelecting a guy who gave us world peace and the best economy in ages?

The Economist has weighed in on the presidential race,
No one gives a shit what this rag thinks. NOT ONE PERSON will be changing their vote because of ANY of the people you promote here as endorsing Harris!

warning that a second Trump presidency carries “an unacceptable risk to America and the world.”
Could be worse. It could be the INSANE RISK of a FIRST Harris presidency!

Great news! I sincerely the The Economist! What do you think?
I think you can't even freaking type a coherent sentence, so why should your unhinged opinions matter here at all.
 
By reelecting a guy who gave us world peace and the best economy in ages?


No one gives a shit what this rag thinks. NOT ONE PERSON will be changing their vote because of ANY of the people you promote here as endorsing Harris!


Could be worse. It could be the INSANE RISK of a FIRST Harris presidency!


I think you can't even freaking type a coherent sentence, so why should your unhinged opinions matter here at all.
Wow, you seem quite excited about this.
 
Wow, you seem quite excited about this.
It took many years to lose trust in the media in many ways. What a joke purchasing magazine subscriptions in which we would believe they were honorable. The Weekly Standard was one of them I would purchase once in a while. So many frauds and shills in that industry. William Krystol deserves to be tied to the front of a vehicle in a war zone. To give him the full experience. The others we know of more and more. Magazines that are bullshit printed for the masses.
 
View attachment 1034310

"Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace" by electing Trump, the newspaper said.

The Economist has weighed in on the presidential race, warning that a second Trump presidency carries “an unacceptable risk to America and the world.”

“By making Mr Trump leader of the free world, Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace,” the weekly newspaper said in an editorial published Thursday that endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president. “If The Economist had a vote, we would cast it for Ms Harris.”

“Even when Mr Trump behaved abominably by fomenting an attack on the Capitol to try to stop the transfer of power on January 6th 2021, America’s institutions held firm,” the paper said.

But his second presidency would likely be very different, the outlet warned.

More at the link below...

The Economist Endorses Harris, Warns Trump Carries 'Unacceptable Risks'

Great news! I sincerely thank The Economist! What do you think?

You do know the Economist isn't an American Publication, correct?


The Economist - Wikipedia


And their editor:

Zanny Minton Beddoes - Wikipedia
 
This is HUGE. The Economist is NOT a "Liberal" rag, it is one the most conservative publications in the country. Their endorsement of Kamala Harris over Diaper Don will make of monied types a reason to vote for her.

it's also not an American publication.

So now you are in favor of foreign influence on our elections?
 
View attachment 1034310

"Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace" by electing Trump, the newspaper said.

The Economist has weighed in on the presidential race, warning that a second Trump presidency carries “an unacceptable risk to America and the world.”

“By making Mr Trump leader of the free world, Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace,” the weekly newspaper said in an editorial published Thursday that endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president. “If The Economist had a vote, we would cast it for Ms Harris.”

“Even when Mr Trump behaved abominably by fomenting an attack on the Capitol to try to stop the transfer of power on January 6th 2021, America’s institutions held firm,” the paper said.

But his second presidency would likely be very different, the outlet warned.

More at the link below...

The Economist Endorses Harris, Warns Trump Carries 'Unacceptable Risks'

Great news! I sincerely thank The Economist! What do you think?
LOL. You mean the rag that has endorsed Obama, Obama, Clinton and Biden?
 
View attachment 1034310

"Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace" by electing Trump, the newspaper said.

The Economist has weighed in on the presidential race, warning that a second Trump presidency carries “an unacceptable risk to America and the world.”

“By making Mr Trump leader of the free world, Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace,” the weekly newspaper said in an editorial published Thursday that endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president. “If The Economist had a vote, we would cast it for Ms Harris.”

“Even when Mr Trump behaved abominably by fomenting an attack on the Capitol to try to stop the transfer of power on January 6th 2021, America’s institutions held firm,” the paper said.

But his second presidency would likely be very different, the outlet warned.

More at the link below...

The Economist Endorses Harris, Warns Trump Carries 'Unacceptable Risks'

Great news! I sincerely thank The Economist! What do you think?
Your problem is Trump has a fine economic record and Kamala has what? Class......anyone........Buhler
What a joke. The Economist are idiots
 
Your problem is Trump has a fine economic record and Kamala has what? Class......anyone........Buhler
What a joke. The Economist are idiots

A total fucking lie. Diaper Don added over $1T to the National Debt. He lost over One Million Jobs due to his disgraceful and deadly handling of the COVID Pandemic.

Right now, the U.S. Economy is envy of the world. Inflation is stagnant. Millions jobs have been created under Biden/Harris. Real wages are up. Diaper Don put the U.S. economy in the shitter.
 
When Elon stated that we were going to have to get poorer, before we could get richer, that was a wooden stake through the heart.

Love the garbage man pic in the OP. If I triple the orange makeup on my face, will my lips look white?
 
View attachment 1034310

"Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace" by electing Trump, the newspaper said.

The Economist has weighed in on the presidential race, warning that a second Trump presidency carries “an unacceptable risk to America and the world.”

“By making Mr Trump leader of the free world, Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace,” the weekly newspaper said in an editorial published Thursday that endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president. “If The Economist had a vote, we would cast it for Ms Harris.”

“Even when Mr Trump behaved abominably by fomenting an attack on the Capitol to try to stop the transfer of power on January 6th 2021, America’s institutions held firm,” the paper said.

But his second presidency would likely be very different, the outlet warned.

More at the link below...

The Economist Endorses Harris, Warns Trump Carries 'Unacceptable Risks'

Great news! I sincerely thank The Economist! What do you think?
/—-/ A bunch of “economists” are buttsore today. Pre COVID, the economy was on fire thanks to Trump.
 
View attachment 1034310

"Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace" by electing Trump, the newspaper said.

The Economist has weighed in on the presidential race, warning that a second Trump presidency carries “an unacceptable risk to America and the world.”

“By making Mr Trump leader of the free world, Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace,” the weekly newspaper said in an editorial published Thursday that endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president. “If The Economist had a vote, we would cast it for Ms Harris.”

“Even when Mr Trump behaved abominably by fomenting an attack on the Capitol to try to stop the transfer of power on January 6th 2021, America’s institutions held firm,” the paper said.

But his second presidency would likely be very different, the outlet warned.

More at the link below...

The Economist Endorses Harris, Warns Trump Carries 'Unacceptable Risks'

Great news! I sincerely thank The Economist! What do you think?
And yet the stock market goes up 3.5% in one day after a Trump win.
 

Forum List

Back
Top