IndependntLogic
Senior Member
- Jul 14, 2011
- 2,997
- 399
- 48
No promoting your own blog.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can't comprehend you people arguing that Romney somehow lost by winning the most states and delegates..
I can't comprehend you people arguing that Romney somehow lost by winning the most states and delegates..
Apparently, you didn't read the post...
I can't comprehend you people arguing that Romney somehow lost by winning the most states and delegates..
Apparently, you didn't read the post...
I did. I found the reasoning unconvincing. Not surprisingly though. He is now currently 1/3 of the way to the nominee and the delegates for tonight arent all distributed.
Yet somehow despite winning more states and delegates than the others, he has had a critical loss.
The reasoning doesnt follow.
There was no post...Just you playing Lakota and posting link with no excerpt or commentary of your own.
The good news is that it wasn't a dreary text wall of you talking about yourself.
Apparently, you didn't read the post...
I did. I found the reasoning unconvincing. Not surprisingly though. He is now currently 1/3 of the way to the nominee and the delegates for tonight arent all distributed.
Yet somehow despite winning more states and delegates than the others, he has had a critical loss.
The reasoning doesnt follow.
The reasoning is that he didn't have decisive wins in the two swing states: Tennessee and Ohio. He barely pulled off Ohio and lost huge in Tennessee. IF he had slaughtered Santorum in both, the fire would have gone out of all contenders and he wouldn't wake up tomorrow having to deal with the royal pain in the ass that Rick Santorum has become.
He could then focus all of his campaigning on attacking Obama and the issues that count to Independents and Moderates: The economy, the deficit, unemployment and so on.
Instead, he is going to have to deal with any issues Santorum decides to use in a desperation attempt to capture a few delegates.
That's not good for him or his chances in the General Election.
There was no post...Just you playing Lakota and posting link with no excerpt or commentary of your own.
The good news is that it wasn't a dreary text wall of you talking about yourself.
It is his own commentary... it's his blog. The only reason he's on this site is to get some idiots to read his idiocy. Pathetic, huh?
There was no post...Just you playing Lakota and posting link with no excerpt or commentary of your own.
The good news is that it wasn't a dreary text wall of you talking about yourself.
It is his own commentary... it's his blog. The only reason he's on this site is to get some idiots to read his idiocy. Pathetic, huh?
Another post that discusses ME instead of the topic or issues!
So do you have anything to say about the subject? No? Of course not!
That's okay. See the signature...
Oh, and i'm on several boards so I found blogging to just be easier. You may now continue posting about me instead of the subject matter...
Hugs & Kisses,
Your BFF
Romney won 6 out of 10 States. Yes, he's in real trouble.
-
Romney won 6 out of 10 States. Yes, he's in real trouble.
-
You seem to misunderstand the point. Romney is definitely going to win the nomination. I have no doubt about that. It's the cost of continuing to battle those in his own party and having to address issues that really aren't relevent to most voters, that I think will hurt him in the General Election.
Romney won 6 out of 10 States. Yes, he's in real trouble.
-
You seem to misunderstand the point. Romney is definitely going to win the nomination. I have no doubt about that. It's the cost of continuing to battle those in his own party and having to address issues that really aren't relevent to most voters, that I think will hurt him in the General Election.
Romney won 6 out of 10 States. Yes, he's in real trouble.
-
You seem to misunderstand the point. Romney is definitely going to win the nomination. I have no doubt about that. It's the cost of continuing to battle those in his own party and having to address issues that really aren't relevent to most voters, that I think will hurt him in the General Election.
And you are welcome to think that.... and even blog about it. But, it's nothing more than an opinion.... you should retitle your blog.... because it is dishonest to claim that you are 'the' independent view.... you are 'an' independent view. That's the whole point with being 'independent'... we tend to speak for ourselves.
I can't comprehend you people arguing that Romney somehow lost by winning the most states and delegates..
Apparently, you didn't read the post...
I did. I found the reasoning unconvincing. Not surprisingly though. He is now currently 1/3 of the way to the nominee and the delegates for tonight arent all distributed.
Yet somehow despite winning more states and delegates than the others, he has had a critical loss.
The reasoning doesnt follow.
You seem to misunderstand the point. Romney is definitely going to win the nomination. I have no doubt about that. It's the cost of continuing to battle those in his own party and having to address issues that really aren't relevent to most voters, that I think will hurt him in the General Election.
And you are welcome to think that.... and even blog about it. But, it's nothing more than an opinion.... you should retitle your blog.... because it is dishonest to claim that you are 'the' independent view.... you are 'an' independent view. That's the whole point with being 'independent'... we tend to speak for ourselves.
Okay, a couple things here little girl. First, you can whine all you want about the blog not being "independent enough" for you but since I've already kicked your great big fat ass on whether you're actually an Independent, that doesn't mean much, does it?
Oh well, maybe in the next thread, you can post about something other than me...