The March 6th GOP Primaries: A Critical Loss for Mitt Romney

It's just more blah blah blah, from the establishment that social conservatism will lose the election, when every time we run a social conservative, like Reagan or Bush, THEY WIN.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Romney won 6 out of 10 States. Yes, he's in real trouble. :rolleyes:
-

You seem to misunderstand the point. Romney is definitely going to win the nomination. I have no doubt about that. It's the cost of continuing to battle those in his own party and having to address issues that really aren't relevent to most voters, that I think will hurt him in the General Election.

The longer the primary goes, the more confident I am Obama is going down. You see, while Obama is playing golf, the Republicans are getting out there with the people. They are stirring up energy. I am very excited for this Novembers election.

Spin.
 
I can't comprehend you people arguing that Romney somehow lost by winning the most states and delegates..

Apparently, you didn't read the post...

I did. The author is a moron...
Romney will win Ohio by the narrowest of margins, perhaps less than even one percent. Worse for Romney are the results from the other swing-state of Ohio.
If he can't get something this simple right....
 
I can't comprehend you people arguing that Romney somehow lost by winning the most states and delegates..

Apparently, you didn't read the post...

I did. I found the reasoning unconvincing. Not surprisingly though. He is now currently 1/3 of the way to the nominee and the delegates for tonight arent all distributed.

Yet somehow despite winning more states and delegates than the others, he has had a critical loss.

The reasoning doesnt follow.

libtard logic. They can't admit anything positive about a Republican, so they spin everything into negatives, even when it doesn't make any logical sense.
 
[

In short, Obama doesn't have to win over ONE McCain voter to win. He just has to get about 83% of the people who showed up for him in 2008 to show up again. .



He won't. Once bitten, twice shy.
 
There was no post...Just you playing Lakota and posting link with no excerpt or commentary of your own.

The good news is that it wasn't a dreary text wall of you talking about yourself.

It is his own commentary... it's his blog. The only reason he's on this site is to get some idiots to read his idiocy. Pathetic, huh?

isn't there a rule here about promoting other sites?
 
[

In short, Obama doesn't have to win over ONE McCain voter to win. He just has to get about 83% of the people who showed up for him in 2008 to show up again. .



He won't. Once bitten, twice shy.

I've not talked to one Obama supporter whose told me that he's just itching to vote for the Weird Mormon Robot.

I've talked to a lot of McCain supporters, not to mention myself, who will not vote for scumbag Romney.
 
There was no post...Just you playing Lakota and posting link with no excerpt or commentary of your own.

The good news is that it wasn't a dreary text wall of you talking about yourself.

It is his own commentary... it's his blog. The only reason he's on this site is to get some idiots to read his idiocy. Pathetic, huh?

isn't there a rule here about promoting other sites?

Report it.

Considering that he doesn't one post and dump and sticks around to defend his work I think you will lose your challenge.
 
Whats laughable is these lefty k00ks actually believe their own shit.........as if their threads are going to swing the election from their PC. Political dumbasses.

Bottom line is..........all this talk about the GOP field being muddled in March aint going to mean dick come November. Every single swinging dick is going to be going to the polls even if Boob McNut was the GOP nominee. They will all be galvanized by the spectre of this fucking fraud getting 4 more years to fuck things up. Especially all people over 30 years old...........they've never seen this shit in their lives before.........a president trying to turn their country into a socialist state.
 
Well for a "loser" Romney did pretty good on Super Tuesday.

I agree Claudette that he won. The problem for him is that he does have to win the nomination out right though with delegates and he keeps winning narrow victories and losing States outright. If he goes to a brokered convention he's in serious trouble.
 
I did. I found the reasoning unconvincing. Not surprisingly though. He is now currently 1/3 of the way to the nominee and the delegates for tonight arent all distributed.

Yet somehow despite winning more states and delegates than the others, he has had a critical loss.

The reasoning doesnt follow.

The reasoning is that he didn't have decisive wins in the two swing states: Tennessee and Ohio. He barely pulled off Ohio and lost huge in Tennessee. IF he had slaughtered Santorum in both, the fire would have gone out of all contenders and he wouldn't wake up tomorrow having to deal with the royal pain in the ass that Rick Santorum has become.
He could then focus all of his campaigning on attacking Obama and the issues that count to Independents and Moderates: The economy, the deficit, unemployment and so on.
Instead, he is going to have to deal with any issues Santorum decides to use in a desperation attempt to capture a few delegates.
That's not good for him or his chances in the General Election.

Bullshit. He won 5 of the 10, with a strong 'second' in some of states he lost. It's the delegates that count... and he'll pick up over 200 from those races. The rest of it doesn't matter.... it's too early for him to worry about the GE.
True, the primary in 2008 went on until June 3, 2008 for Obama. Many more states to choose.
 
Well for a "loser" Romney did pretty good on Super Tuesday.

I agree Claudette that he won. The problem for him is that he does have to win the nomination out right though with delegates and he keeps winning narrow victories and losing States outright. If he goes to a brokered convention he's in serious trouble.
Technically, Clinton won the popular vote in primaries, one of which was sanctioned by the Democratic party under party rules in 2008. Obama won the nomination, and the presidency. THAT long long drawn out battle did not hurt the nominee. The pertinent only matter of concern for Republicans is third party spin off.
 
[

In short, Obama doesn't have to win over ONE McCain voter to win. He just has to get about 83% of the people who showed up for him in 2008 to show up again. .



He won't. Once bitten, twice shy.

I've not talked to one Obama supporter whose told me that he's just itching to vote for the Weird Mormon Robot.

I've talked to a lot of McCain supporters, not to mention myself, who will not vote for scumbag Romney.


Wow, is that your scientific polling method, you illogical, lying, lefty fuck?
 
Well for a "loser" Romney did pretty good on Super Tuesday.

I agree Claudette that he won. The problem for him is that he does have to win the nomination out right though with delegates and he keeps winning narrow victories and losing States outright. If he goes to a brokered convention he's in serious trouble.

No, the problem Romney has is that this shouldn't be a contest.

He's going up against two guys who got run out of Congress. Guys who were polling in single digits back in December.

He's outspending them at a rate of 10-1, and still struggling. Even in a state where the party outright cheats and keeps them off the ballot (Virginia) Romney still loses 41% of the vote to the crazy fringe candidate.

He's so weak he can't even condemn Rush Limbaugh when Rush has essentially driven millions of women and right-thinking men into the arms of the Democrats.
 
Well for a "loser" Romney did pretty good on Super Tuesday.

I agree Claudette that he won. The problem for him is that he does have to win the nomination out right though with delegates and he keeps winning narrow victories and losing States outright. If he goes to a brokered convention he's in serious trouble.
Technically, Clinton won the popular vote in primaries, one of which was sanctioned by the Democratic party under party rules in 2008. Obama won the nomination, and the presidency. THAT long long drawn out battle did not hurt the nominee. The pertinent only matter of concern for Republicans is third party spin off.


Another pertinent factor is that the democrats had the media in their pocket no matter who won the primary. If mrs. bubba had won it would have been non-stop coverage of the 'historic quest for a woman to take her rightful place in the seat of power!' and all that nonsense.
 
He won't. Once bitten, twice shy.

I've not talked to one Obama supporter whose told me that he's just itching to vote for the Weird Mormon Robot.

I've talked to a lot of McCain supporters, not to mention myself, who will not vote for scumbag Romney.


Wow, is that your scientific polling method, you illogical, lying, lefty fuck?

Polls show that Obama is beating Romney by anywhere from 2-10 points. Not one poll shows him beating Obama.

That scientific enough for ya, bud?

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama

and here's the thing. They haven't even gotten started on Romney yet. Most Americans aren't paying attention right now.
 
Well for a "loser" Romney did pretty good on Super Tuesday.

I agree Claudette that he won. The problem for him is that he does have to win the nomination out right though with delegates and he keeps winning narrow victories and losing States outright. If he goes to a brokered convention he's in serious trouble.
Technically, Clinton won the popular vote in primaries, one of which was sanctioned by the Democratic party under party rules in 2008. Obama won the nomination, and the presidency. THAT long long drawn out battle did not hurt the nominee. The pertinent only matter of concern for Republicans is third party spin off.

But here's the thing. Most Obama supporters would have been fine with Hillary, and most Hillary supporters were fine with Obama.

The thing in the GOP contest is that you have a Romney vote and an anti-Romney vote. Romney has only had the virtue of that these anti-Romneys are 1) Weak, 2) Splitting the vote between them and 3) Horribly underfunded.

The Virginia thing is interesting. Ron Paul had his best showing yet. The GOP establishment found ways to keep Santorum and Gingrich off the ballot, but anti-Romney vote STILL wound up at 41%, not because they love Ron Paul, but because they hate Romney.

Now, will they get most of the Anti-Romneys into line by June? Probably. Will it be the kind of enthusiasm you need to unseat an incumbant? Not hardly.
 
I've not talked to one Obama supporter whose told me that he's just itching to vote for the Weird Mormon Robot.

I've talked to a lot of McCain supporters, not to mention myself, who will not vote for scumbag Romney.


Wow, is that your scientific polling method, you illogical, lying, lefty fuck?

Polls show that Obama is beating Romney by anywhere from 2-10 points. Not one poll shows him beating Obama.

That scientific enough for ya, bud?



and here's the thing. They haven't even gotten started on Romney yet. Most Americans aren't paying attention right now.


Try reading your own post, you stupid leftist whore. You won't get it, but try anyway.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top