- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #1,961
There is no straw man argument being made. Israel deliberately expelled certain Palestinians then created laws to prevent them from returning. That is wrong. Just as wrong, just as wrong as when the Jews were forceably expelled. Any kind of peace agreement would have to some how address that wrong even if it is simple acknowledgement.That You have to reserve to such ridiculous strawman arguments only shows I've made my point clear.....
I said, at the "least" because many of those people are no longer alive and I don't believe in monetary compensation to descendents (either Jewish or Palestinians). A formal apology and simple acknowledgement of wrong done can go a long ways. Including with the Palestinians.
Basically You've proven once more that the term 'Palestinian' was appropriated to refer only to Arabs, and to dissolve them from any responsibility in an all out coordinated war against Jews.
Arabs to this day continue with the demand of Jew free state in Judea,
and You demand an apology?!
For confiscated property, for expelling them from their villages, and for the laws that deliberately prevented them from reclaiming it, yes.
But damn, I keep forgetting - Israel can do no wrong!
Compared to 1400 years of Arab murder and theft, how Israel responded is drop in the bucket. That Jews were expelled from virtually every Arab country, while there're actually more Arabs living in Jewish ancestral land today than ever before - just shows You who caused most of loss in the conflict, and who's aim it was from the beginning.
Using Your logic Spaniards owe restitutions to the Caliphate for liberating Spain.
Frankly I have yet to see any admission that Israel ever does anything wrong from most Team Israel supporters. And to pretend that these Palestinians are owed anything or that no wrong was done by Israel in this case. Was it ok for Jews to be expelled? Of course not. Was it ok for Palestinians to be expelled? Apparently so. I am not talking about hundreds or thousands of years of events. I am talking about an event where those who were the victims are still alive.
It's easy for You not to talk about "hundreds of years of event", because You'll be put in an impossible position to demand anything from Israel. You're just looking for excuses to find relativity where there's none.
Let's just talk about the Arab Pogroms in Syria Palestine that moved Jews to organize Zionism, shall we?....Yeah even there it all started with Arabs dispossessing Jews of their ancient holy cities.
There're simply no proportions in which You can compare 1400 years of displacement and dissolve the Arabs for the responsibility of losses, on both sides.
1. What difference does what happened hundreds of years ago make in resolving today’s problems beyond imparting a greater understanding of what led to today? Those people are dead and those regimes are gone. These people are alive today. Israel is a regional power. No one can demand anything of Israel it does not CHOOSE to give. Going back and rehashing thousands of years of history as justification for today’s actions is a page right out of the Balkans playbook. Or I could say the Arab playbook since they too like to hold on to old angers.
2. Acknowledging that something wrong was done is not absolving the other of anything. Israel is established, it has stood long enough that it can now afford to examine some of the chapters in its own history without fear of crumbling into dust. If not now then when? Never? When Israel won its war it established and fiercely promoted its official narrative, a narrative that was not entirely true, as was shown when historians were finally allowed to examine old documents. One of those was why the Palestinians fled their villages. The official version was that Arab leaders told them to flee, they would slaughter the Jews, then they could return. When historical documents were examined that accounted for very few. Most fled either out of fear of the horrors of war or were forcibly expelled by Jewish militias. Then Israel created absentee landowner laws, which confiscated unclaimed property and at the same time refused to allow them back. The bar for Palestinians to reclaim property was set very high and the bar for Jews to reclaim property much lower.
3. Look at the Palestinian claim of right of return. Where does that fit? If we approach it with your view of all historical wrongs count towards some final tally defining justice TODAY, then they and all their descendents have a right to return regardless of the fact that most have never set foot there and that right will continue to exist in a thousand years because we can’t possibly resolve any injustice without looking at the accumulated tally of rights and wrongs by each party back to the dawn of history.