The PC Police and their motives

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Dec 8, 2011
117,980
119,457
3,635
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.
.

The PC Police are very "offended" (love that word) when their motives are questioned.

Interestingly, they will defend the right of an Imam to shout "death to America" to a packed mosque in New York City, yet they want to punish some old, ignorant bigoted restaurant owner in Podunk USA for saying something old, ignorant and bigoted.

Then they'll defend that with a dissertation on law and "public accommodations". Funny, these are the same people who are so willing to defend illegal immigrants that they'll give them a new moniker like "undocumented immigrants". The law? We must change it!

I also have to wonder why someone would want so much to "fundamentally change" a country that they claim to love.

Questioning their motives is probably a good idea.

.
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: 007
.

The PC Police are very "offended" (love that word) when their motives are questioned.

Interestingly, they will defend the right of an Imam to shout "death to America" to a packed mosque in New York City, yet they want to punish some old, ignorant bigoted restaurant owner in Podunk USA for saying something old, ignorant and bigoted.

Then they'll defend that with a dissertation on law and "public accommodations". Funny, these are the same people who are so willing to defend illegal immigrants that they'll give them a new moniker like "undocumented immigrants". The law? We must change it!

Questioning their motives is probably a good idea.

.

How did they want to punish that restaurant owner?
 
.

The PC Police are very "offended" (love that word) when their motives are questioned.

Interestingly, they will defend the right of an Imam to shout "death to America" to a packed mosque in New York City, yet they want to punish some old, ignorant bigoted restaurant owner in Podunk USA for saying something old, ignorant and bigoted.

Then they'll defend that with a dissertation on law and "public accommodations". Funny, these are the same people who are so willing to defend illegal immigrants that they'll give them a new moniker like "undocumented immigrants". The law? We must change it!

Questioning their motives is probably a good idea.

.

The answer to every one of your posts is SILENCE demanded.
 
they will defend the right of an Imam to shout "death to America" to a packed mosque in New York City

Do you have a link for this incident and the subsequent "defense"?

Of course "they" will. They also defend the right of the dipfuck in podunk to say whatever he likes. We will attack both for their words while defending their right to say them.
 
Who decides what is politically correct?

The left.

So of course every stereotype they attack is supposed to be Republicans.

Whites
NASCAR
Duck Dynasty
Christians
Businesses
The Rich
Gun Owners
Right To Life

Seems what is politically correct is diametrically opposed to everything America and the right represents.
 
they will defend the right of an Imam to shout "death to America" to a packed mosque in New York City

Do you have a link for this incident and the subsequent "defense"?

Of course "they" will. They also defend the right of the dipfuck in podunk to say whatever he likes. We will attack both for their words while defending their right to say them.

That must be why they wanted Rush taken off of the air.
 
.

The PC Police are very "offended" (love that word) when their motives are questioned.

Interestingly, they will defend the right of an Imam to shout "death to America" to a packed mosque in New York City, yet they want to punish some old, ignorant bigoted restaurant owner in Podunk USA for saying something old, ignorant and bigoted.

Then they'll defend that with a dissertation on law and "public accommodations". Funny, these are the same people who are so willing to defend illegal immigrants that they'll give them a new moniker like "undocumented immigrants". The law? We must change it!

Questioning their motives is probably a good idea.

Leftist/progressive/politically correct group think...

islamdeathrights.gif


... only they wouldn't defend 'conservative, white, Christian, male, veteran, heterosexual' speech for any reason.
 
Last edited:
they will defend the right of an Imam to shout "death to America" to a packed mosque in New York City

Do you have a link for this incident and the subsequent "defense"?

Of course "they" will. They also defend the right of the dipfuck in podunk to say whatever he likes. We will attack both for their words while defending their right to say them.

That must be why they wanted Rush taken off of the air.

He still would have the right to say whatever he wanted, he just wouldn't have a National platform upon which to say it.

I don't want Rush off the air, especially as he becomes increasingly incoherent. I would like to see the people that own the radio stations he is on to open up some of those airwaves for other voices but they own the shows and the stations so they HAVE to play Rush..on three fucking stations in LA and two in San Francisco. :rolleyes: Market driven my ass...
 
Who decides what is politically correct?

The left.

So of course every stereotype they attack is supposed to be Republicans.

Whites
NASCAR
Duck Dynasty
Christians
Businesses
The Rich
Gun Owners
Right To Life

Seems what is politically correct is diametrically opposed to everything America and the right represents.
That is correct... it's all part of the "FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMATION" obama spoke of.

There's only one problem, people got pushed a little too far, a little too fast and now they're getting sick of it. The liberals got an inch and took a mile, and now people are catching on and thinking, 'now wait just a damn minute here.' There's a reset coming, the push back is on the way. The left might be trying their level best to destroy the fabric, the back bone, the bed rock, the heritage and the character of what truly is AMERICA, but they went too far in their short time in power, and now they're going to pay for it. November is going to be a complete REBUKE of democrats and their socialist, obamacare, marxist, two faced, hypocritical, POLITICALLY CORRECT garbage.
 
Last edited:
Do you have a link for this incident and the subsequent "defense"?

Of course "they" will. They also defend the right of the dipfuck in podunk to say whatever he likes. We will attack both for their words while defending their right to say them.

That must be why they wanted Rush taken off of the air.

He still would have the right to say whatever he wanted, he just wouldn't have a National platform upon which to say it.

I don't want Rush off the air, especially as he becomes increasingly incoherent. I would like to see the people that own the radio stations he is on to open up some of those airwaves for other voices but they own the shows and the stations so they HAVE to play Rush..on three fucking stations in LA and two in San Francisco. :rolleyes: Market driven my ass...

You're listening to Rush through filters.

Spend a few days listening to his show and you'll most likely change your opinion of him.

He is not anti-gay and he is not a racist.

I don't believe everything that he does, but he's pretty much right on when it comes to politics, and he's also the GOP's biggest critic.
 
Do you have a link for this incident and the subsequent "defense"?

Of course "they" will. They also defend the right of the dipfuck in podunk to say whatever he likes. We will attack both for their words while defending their right to say them.

That must be why they wanted Rush taken off of the air.

He still would have the right to say whatever he wanted, he just wouldn't have a National platform upon which to say it.

I don't want Rush off the air, especially as he becomes increasingly incoherent. I would like to see the people that own the radio stations he is on to open up some of those airwaves for other voices but they own the shows and the stations so they HAVE to play Rush..on three fucking stations in LA and two in San Francisco. :rolleyes: Market driven my ass...
He's only "incoherent" to the whack jobs on the left that are on the lunatic fringe train to liberal utopia.

Those of us that are rooted in reality and adhere to traditional values understand him completely.
 
Who decides what is politically correct?

The left.

So of course every stereotype they attack is supposed to be Republicans.

Whites
NASCAR
Duck Dynasty
Christians
Businesses
The Rich
Gun Owners
Right To Life

Seems what is politically correct is diametrically opposed to everything America and the right represents.
That is correct... it's all part of the "FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMATION" obama spoke of.

There's only one problem, people got pushed a little too far, a little fast and now they're getting sick of it. The liberals got an inch and took a mile, and now people are catching on and thinking, 'now wait just a damn minute here.' There's a reset coming, the push back is on the way. There left might be trying their level best to destroy the fabric, the back bone, the heritage and the character of what truly is AMERICA, but they went too far in their short time in power, and now they're going to pay for it. November is going to be a complete REBUKE of democrats and their socialist, marxist, two faced, hypocritical, POLITICALLY CORRECT garbage.
Yet the mile still isn't good enough for them.

P.J. O'Rourke nailed it when he called liberalism the political philosophy of spoiled little brats.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: 007
That must be why they wanted Rush taken off of the air.

He still would have the right to say whatever he wanted, he just wouldn't have a National platform upon which to say it.

I don't want Rush off the air, especially as he becomes increasingly incoherent. I would like to see the people that own the radio stations he is on to open up some of those airwaves for other voices but they own the shows and the stations so they HAVE to play Rush..on three fucking stations in LA and two in San Francisco. :rolleyes: Market driven my ass...

You're listening to Rush through filters.

Spend a few days listening to his show and you'll most likely change your opinion of him.

He is not anti-gay and he is not a racist.

I don't believe everything that he does, but he's pretty much right on when it comes to politics, and he's also the GOP's biggest critic.

Funny you should say that...I live in the SF Bay Area where we don't have any progressive talk radio shows and I can't help listening to him on occasion since right wing talk and their gazillion watt channels come in everywhere. I happened to catch him on a Michael Sam rant. Not homophobic? Bovine feces.
 
Who decides what is politically correct?

The left.

So of course every stereotype they attack is supposed to be Republicans.

Whites
NASCAR
Duck Dynasty
Christians
Businesses
The Rich
Gun Owners
Right To Life

Seems what is politically correct is diametrically opposed to everything America and the right represents.
That is correct... it's all part of the "FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMATION" obama spoke of.

There's only one problem, people got pushed a little too far, a little fast and now they're getting sick of it. The liberals got an inch and took a mile, and now people are catching on and thinking, 'now wait just a damn minute here.' There's a reset coming, the push back is on the way. There left might be trying their level best to destroy the fabric, the back bone, the heritage and the character of what truly is AMERICA, but they went too far in their short time in power, and now they're going to pay for it. November is going to be a complete REBUKE of democrats and their socialist, marxist, two faced, hypocritical, POLITICALLY CORRECT garbage.
Yet the mile still isn't good enough for them.

P.J. O'Rourke nailed it when he called liberalism the political philosophy of spoiled little brats.
Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Case in point: Anyone that wants more and more, bigger and bigger government that's ever more oppressive and intrusive, is flat out SICK IN THE FUCKING HEAD. But that's what liberals want.
 
He still would have the right to say whatever he wanted, he just wouldn't have a National platform upon which to say it.

I don't want Rush off the air, especially as he becomes increasingly incoherent. I would like to see the people that own the radio stations he is on to open up some of those airwaves for other voices but they own the shows and the stations so they HAVE to play Rush..on three fucking stations in LA and two in San Francisco. :rolleyes: Market driven my ass...

You're listening to Rush through filters.

Spend a few days listening to his show and you'll most likely change your opinion of him.

He is not anti-gay and he is not a racist.

I don't believe everything that he does, but he's pretty much right on when it comes to politics, and he's also the GOP's biggest critic.

Funny you should say that...I live in the SF Bay Area where we don't have any progressive talk radio shows and I can't help listening to him on occasion since right wing talk and their gazillion watt channels come in everywhere. I happened to catch him on a Michael Sam rant. Not homophobic? Bovine feces.
So what did he say that is homophobic?
 
He still would have the right to say whatever he wanted, he just wouldn't have a National platform upon which to say it.

I don't want Rush off the air, especially as he becomes increasingly incoherent. I would like to see the people that own the radio stations he is on to open up some of those airwaves for other voices but they own the shows and the stations so they HAVE to play Rush..on three fucking stations in LA and two in San Francisco. :rolleyes: Market driven my ass...

You're listening to Rush through filters.

Spend a few days listening to his show and you'll most likely change your opinion of him.

He is not anti-gay and he is not a racist.

I don't believe everything that he does, but he's pretty much right on when it comes to politics, and he's also the GOP's biggest critic.

Funny you should say that...I live in the SF Bay Area where we don't have any progressive talk radio shows and I can't help listening to him on occasion since right wing talk and their gazillion watt channels come in everywhere. I happened to catch him on a Michael Sam rant. Not homophobic? Bovine feces.
I've been listening to Limbaugh for over 15 years, and never once have ever heard him express a FEAR of homos.

So no, he's not homophobic.

Will he on occasion bring into question the motives behind liberals and their championing of the homo agenda? Yes, but that in no shape, way or form makes him HOMOPHOBIC.

Got another straw horse in the corral you'd like to parade out?
 
Last edited:
Do you have a link for this incident and the subsequent "defense"?

Of course "they" will. They also defend the right of the dipfuck in podunk to say whatever he likes. We will attack both for their words while defending their right to say them.

That must be why they wanted Rush taken off of the air.

He still would have the right to say whatever he wanted, he just wouldn't have a National platform upon which to say it.

I don't want Rush off the air, especially as he becomes increasingly incoherent. I would like to see the people that own the radio stations he is on to open up some of those airwaves for other voices but they own the shows and the stations so they HAVE to play Rush..on three fucking stations in LA and two in San Francisco. :rolleyes: Market driven my ass...
I can't stand Lush Limpjaw but think about what you are saying here, think very carefully about what you are saying.
What you are bitching about is market driven, if it wasn't do you honestly think they would still be on the air?
 
.

The PC Police are very "offended" (love that word) when their motives are questioned.

Interestingly, they will defend the right of an Imam to shout "death to America" to a packed mosque in New York City, yet they want to punish some old, ignorant bigoted restaurant owner in Podunk USA for saying something old, ignorant and bigoted.

Then they'll defend that with a dissertation on law and "public accommodations". Funny, these are the same people who are so willing to defend illegal immigrants that they'll give them a new moniker like "undocumented immigrants". The law? We must change it!

Questioning their motives is probably a good idea.

.

The answer to every one of your posts is SILENCE demanded.


Not sure what that means, but avoidance tactics don't really need to make sense, do they?

Maybe try some name-calling or personal insults, that's usually The PC Police strategy.

.
 
That must be why they wanted Rush taken off of the air.

He still would have the right to say whatever he wanted, he just wouldn't have a National platform upon which to say it.

I don't want Rush off the air, especially as he becomes increasingly incoherent. I would like to see the people that own the radio stations he is on to open up some of those airwaves for other voices but they own the shows and the stations so they HAVE to play Rush..on three fucking stations in LA and two in San Francisco. :rolleyes: Market driven my ass...
I can't stand Lush Limpjaw but think about what you are saying here, think very carefully about what you are saying.
What you are bitching about is market driven, if it wasn't do you honestly think they would still be on the air?

The fact that Los Angeles has no progressive radio stations and three or four right wing stations is not Market Driven. The fact that San Francisco has no progressive radio and three right wing talk stations is NOT market driven.

Taking the number one rated talk show in it's time slot in San Francisco and replacing it with Glen Beck is NOT market driven.
 

Forum List

Back
Top