English translated from Greek and Latin are just fine; English is in fat built on both languages, so that line of argument is nonsense. Same for Hebrew and Aramaic to Greek; Greek was a popular language among Jewish scholars, so another argument along those lines is silly as well.
And, the vast majority of Christian sects agree on far more than they disagree on, the 4 Gospels and Revelation being the core 'canon', the rest chosen for their provenance and origins, with the exceptions of the Book of Hebrews, which is included for its information and clarifications of certain early issues. And as Darrell Bock has proven, the early orthodox versions are indeed the earliest, and only morons believe Constantine ran around rewriting a lot of stuff, and the Gnostic rubbish is also silly nonsense. People who keep babbling otherwise are merely dishonestly hoping to to rewrite it themselves, inserting their own lies and rubbish as legit.
And, the vast majority of Christian sects agree on far more than they disagree on, the 4 Gospels and Revelation being the core 'canon', the rest chosen for their provenance and origins, with the exceptions of the Book of Hebrews, which is included for its information and clarifications of certain early issues. And as Darrell Bock has proven, the early orthodox versions are indeed the earliest, and only morons believe Constantine ran around rewriting a lot of stuff, and the Gnostic rubbish is also silly nonsense. People who keep babbling otherwise are merely dishonestly hoping to to rewrite it themselves, inserting their own lies and rubbish as legit.