Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can't see the point written in plain English? Oh well, socks can't read anyway. Trump honored fallen veterans. Biden and Harris got them killed and then completely ignored the families and didn't even have the decency to call them. Now until you have some proof to counter any of that, STFU. Continue your crying..
Eat me.............A federal appeals court on Friday ruled against the Trump administration in its transfer of $2.5 billion from military construction projects to build sections of the U.S. border wall with Mexico, ruling it illegally sidestepped Congress, which gets to decide how to use the funds.
So now he wants to pose with "suckers and losers" in his words?
LOL............great point, if it was used, Biden campaign would have had to pay some type of royalty to UPI.Did you notice the UPI logo in the lower right.
It means it was taken by the press (united press international)
Not by Biden, or the Biden campaign, or his staff.
So, an opinion with no proof is proof?Easy, good God you're stupid
The border is not the same as our fallen soldiers.I didn't read through the whole entire thread as I just heard Trump speaking about this earlier and it's completely awful. As for the quote above me I just have to respond with but Biden and Harris sure used the border for publicity.
PSA: Don't feed the sea lions.No kidding, what was the law that was broken?
Oh look, the artist is criticizing their own work.This a political forum. Your porn collection is on the other tab.
It is strictly for media outlets to take photographs in Arlington Cemetary.Did you notice the UPI logo in the lower right.
It means it was taken by the press (united press international)
Not by Biden, or the Biden campaign, or his staff.
When you put the two cases together, you realize the 5th circuit ruled on the merits of the case. Then the full 5th circuit threw it out on technical grounds (lack of standing) Even though there was harm to the county because a $20 million road construction project was cancelled by the redirection of the funds.Eat me.............
HOUSTON — A federal appeals court ruled Friday that a lower court was wrong to bar the Trump administration from taking $3.6 billion from military construction projects for a border wall.
A panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that El Paso County and the nonprofit Border Network for Human Rights did not have the standing to challenge President Donald Trump’s redirecting funds from more than 100 military construction projects, including a $20 million road project at a base located in the city. The appeals court found that neither the county nor the Border Network proved it was directly harmed by Trump’s move. The court reversed a December 2019 ruling by U.S. District Judge David Briones.
![]()
Appeals court rules for Trump taking military money for wall
The U.S. Supreme Court has already agreed to review a different ruling on the use of military construction funds.www.marinecorpstimes.com
That Trump vehemently denies something is almost proof it's true.In sum, the claim stemmed from a story by The Atlantic, which relied on anonymous, second-hand reports of Trump's alleged words; there was no independent footage or documented proof to substantiate the in-question comments; and Trump vehemently denies that he once called service members "losers" and "suckers." While it was certainly possible that he said those things, Snopes was unable to independently verify the claim.
![]()