- Banned
- #161
A contractor actually is generally a private sector entity, regardless of who is paying for his/her services on any given job.
But, the SPENDING to pay for his/her services on a given job CAN certainly be government spending.
Who's rationalizing what?
YES, that IS my point.
Whether it's through a contractor or directly to an employee, the money is still spent, and the job is still being done for that money...
and whether the money is going to a state through an intermediary or directly, it's still an earmark.
When it comes down to it, we don't NEED these planes to protect our country. We can easily protect ourselves with much less than what we spend, and we can certainily defend ourselves without these planes.
Creating contracts like this, therefore, are basically just handing out money so people in certain areas have jobs, and certain companies make a profit.
In other words, earmarks.