TheGreatGatsby
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #441
I envy that, if we had the same sort of commitment from guys like Tony Allen, Ray Allen, Stiesma, Pietrus etc we would be alot better off right now, thats for sure. Perkins was traded so I'm not including him in this.
Sometimes, it's circumstance too. Duncan, Parker and Ginobili were all championship players early in their careers and the Spurs were getting more bang for their buck. And once they knew they were a dynasty, it was easier for everyone to get together and sort of make a long term plan. The stability is much better for the players 4-12. They are able to find their roles and relish them; rather than competing for ego. Danny Green on any other team might be pissed that he was not getting more minutes or ball time with the way he's playing. And K Leanoard is a solid player who is having his ego checked at the door every day. On another team, he'd be learning bad attitudes.
It just sounds like a good environment for the players all the way around, I don't get why Boston isn't like that. We did win the championship in 2008 as soon as Pierce/Garnett/Allen were put together, made the Finals in 2010, thats really not a bad run. I don't get why instead of building around what we have it seems like we are just throwing pieces away and investing too much in players like Bass and Green.
If KG didn't go down with the knee injury; the C's would have likely three-peated. So, the model was there.
Although Bass played well in the playoffs last year; I'm not a huge fan of how he fits. Green is a fun an exciting player with a lot of upside. I'm looking forward to his progression.
I don't blame Ainge for Perkins. He was pressured by ownership to make the stupid cuts. Boston C's have had bad ownership ever since they were bought in the 90's and then the resulting partners essentially black balled Bird. The newer owners are better but not exactly world class.