Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you have no problem believing that Lee Oswald was not the only one shooting at JFK (if he indeed shot at anyone at all, which has never been proved) if only the president had been shot more times?Originality is not necessary when 100% of the facts of what happened on that day (as far as the assassination goes and what happened after) are confirmed. The "all star team" of assassins that scored only 2 hits is original. It's also incredibly moronic.
. Sure. That's seems "reasonable". How many holes in the president would convince you?
Oswald received security clearances to go on duty at the naval base in Atsugi, Japan where the famous U-2 spy plane program was based keeping tabs on the Soviet Union."Subject( Oswald) received additional indoctrination at our own Camp Peary site from September 8 to October 17, 1958, and participated in a few relatively minor assignments until arrangements were made for his entry into the Soviet Union in September 1959.
I think the president was murdered in a blatant coup and I think LBJ appointed the Warren Commission as an extra-judicial body whose sole purpose was to manage the official narrative of the crime (not the actual truth of it) and mold public opinion.Tell us, in your own words please, what you think happened in Dealey Plaza that day.
Wrong.So you have no problem believing that Lee Oswald was not the only one shooting at JFK (if he indeed shot at anyone at all, which has never been proved)Originality is not necessary when 100% of the facts of what happened on that day (as far as the assassination goes and what happened after) are confirmed. The "all star team" of assassins that scored only 2 hits is original. It's also incredibly moronic.
Yes.if only the president had been shot more times?
Ummm....okay
Thanks.Sure.
Thats because it is.That's seems "reasonable”.
How many holes in the president would convince you?
[quoute]
Much more than two.
Needs to be? No. Would have been. Yes.Three? Five? Eight or more? Once the president's head has been blown apart and his brains spill out of his shattered skull
(the back of his skull, by the way, not the front, as testified by twelve ER physicians on duty at Parkland hospital who were the first medical personnel to see him) do you really think he needs to be shot some more?
Yes.Really?
I think the president was murdered in a blatant coup and I think LBJ appointed the Warren Commission as an extra-judicial body whose sole purpose was to manage the official narrative of the crime (not the actual truth of it) and mold public opinion.Tell us, in your own words please, what you think happened in Dealey Plaza that day.
And I know for the last fifty years a clear majority of Americans have never accepted or believed the unambiguous attempts by the Warren Commission and their little quislings to obscure the truth.
Several tests given Oswald while in police custody all proved negative. Oswald's Rifle and Paraffin Tests : The JFK AssassinationWrong.
Handprints on the murder weapon, murder weapon in the same picture as he was, bullet trajectories point to the building where he worked.
There is no proof of that....just like there is no proof of Oswald shooting the president. There is only the grossly error riddled Warren Commission narrative. Grow up, use your brain and look at facts.People also believe Elvis is alive.
Tell us, in your own words please, what you think happened in Dealey Plaza that day.
Allow me....the CIA assembled an all star team of assassins and they ended up looking like buffons. They fired through the windshield and missed....shot him through the back, hit him in the throat, hit an unintended target in Connolly, one shot ended up across from the grassy knoll, one shot hit the curb causing a busted piece of concrete to cut a bystander. Had it not been for the umbrella man to signal Greer to stop so Jack Allen Lawrence could get an unobstructed shot from the storm drain, Kennedy might have survived this.
Well...that certainly is a theory. A whole team of ALL STAR assassins got 2 hits on a car moving 15 mph. If ignorance ever gets to $40 a barrel, can I have drilling rights on your skull?
That lame insult has been around for decades. You can't account for the numerous wounds, missed shots,etc,etc.......sad for you.
Every shot is accounted for; as is every wound.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!! They missed and they missed badly until Greer stopped the car. Even the doctored Zapruder film shows Kennedy's head being lifted and up to the left. The kill shot was to the right temple and not to the back of the head. You believe the bullshit Warren report because you have a childlike faith in your beloved "gubermint" that is nothing but a corporate entity that saw JFK as a threat to their hegemony. The murder of JFK was insignificant compared to the crimes against humanity that they have put upon leaders that didn't have the weapons to fend them off....the crimes that they have committed against the "citizens" of USA.INC. You are sooooo fucking naive.
Below is a link to a letter written by John McCone ( head of the CIA) to James J Rowley (head of the Secret Service and both This was written in March of 1964. Please pay special attention to this part.....
"Subject( Oswald) received additional indoctrination at our own Camp Peary site from September 8 to October 17, 1958, and participated in a few relatively minor assignments until arrangements were made for his entry into the Soviet Union in September 1959. While in the Soviet Union, he was on special assignment in the area of Minsk. It would not be advantageous at this time to divulge the specifics of that assignment; however, if you wish this information, it can be made available for your personal inspection within the confines of our own offices, or I can send it by courier on the condition that it not leave the custody of the courier. I am concerned that if this information were in any way disclosed to the wrong persons, it would lead the media to erroneously claim this agency, and perhaps others, were directly involved in the Dallas action. While the persons involved were in the employ of this agency, as well as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, it is virtually impossible for this or any agency to maintain full, 24-hours-a-day responsibility over its operatives."
So, now we know that Oswald was indeed a "CIA" operative. I also find it incredibly telling that both McCone and Rowley were jesuits.
McCone/Rowley
The entire document will be typed herein, as I cannot cut and paste it and still make it readable. It is a "United States Government" Memorandum dated March 3, 1964 (stamped "Confidential" and is from "Mr. John McCone Director, Central Intelligence Agency," to "Mr. James J. Rowley, Chief, U.S. Secre...
MANUSCRIPTSERVICE.COM
It was his rifle. The bullets matched his gun. Old news.Several tests given Oswald while in police custody all proved negative. Oswald's Rifle and Paraffin Tests : The JFK AssassinationWrong.
Handprints on the murder weapon, murder weapon in the same picture as he was, bullet trajectories point to the building where he worked.
It can't be established he fired a rifle at all that day in question...get it?
Yes, and he carried it to work that day. Nobody found the “curtain rods” he said he was carrying to work.You can point to all the pictures and hand prints you like (if a gun supposedly belongs to someone it would be strange if his prints were NOT present).
False.Not only can no one prove Oswald shot the president but they can't even prove his Manlicher
Carcano rifle was in the sixth floor "shooter's nest" the day of the shooting. The Rifle found in the Texas School Book Depository
Police officers first on the scene did not find Oswald's rifle. They found a Mauser 7.65 instead.
There is no proof of that....just like there is no proof of Oswald shooting the president. There is only the grossly error riddled Warren Commission narrative. Grow up, use your brain and look at facts.People also believe Elvis is alive.
Prove it, quisling.It was his rifle. The bullets matched his gun. Old news.
Prove that too. Your merely mouthing Warren Commission bullshit.Yes, and he carried it to work that day. Nobody found the “curtain rods” he said he was carrying to work.
False how? What is false? Show me where police who tested Oswald for tell tale signs he fired his cheap war surplus rifle at the president, allegedly, tested positive for anything. Show that.False.
There is no proof Elvis still lives.The thing you were referencing was that there are people who refuse to believe the Warren Commission. I pointed out there are also people who refuse to believe Elivs is dead. Both have one thing in common, their beliefs fly in the face of the evidence and logic itself.
There is no proof Elvis still lives.The thing you were referencing was that there are people who refuse to believe the Warren Commission. I pointed out there are also people who refuse to believe Elivs is dead. Both have one thing in common, their beliefs fly in the face of the evidence and logic itself.
There is likewise zero proof that the Warren Commission lie filled narrative is true.
How gullible and dumb are you anyway?
Never said it was. I did say that Oswald didn't bring his pistol (aka gun) with him to the TSBD that morning. Yet after he shot JFK with his rifle, he took precious time out to go home and get it. Thus, it wasn't important before he shot JFK but became important after he did. To me, this is indicative of something changing between the the time he decided to kill JFK and the time after he pulled the trigger.First of all a gun is not a rifle....
False.the Warren Commission claim that Oswald bought the rifle in question
No. Oswald bought the rifle.is unproven and cannot be proven. It was bought by mail order. Anyone under any name could have bought that rifle....
And then falsify a picture of him holding the rifle, falsify his bringing the rifle to work that day, falsify the DPD finding the rifle where he worked...if someone wanted to frame oswald....it would have been very easy for them to rent a po box in his name and buy the rifle to make it appear that Oswald bought the rifle.
The majority of the American People do not believe the b.s. you and the warren commission spout thus....that places you and your opinion in the cheap seats with all the other dupes.
No gun powder nitrates on Oswald's cheek when Dallas cops tested him while in custody.Oswald’s guilt as the lone gunman is not in question from any serious quarter. You should stop pretending otherwise.
No gun powder nitrates on Oswald's cheek when Dallas cops tested him while in custody.Oswald’s guilt as the lone gunman is not in question from any serious quarter. You should stop pretending otherwise.
Please tell me, sir or madame, how Oswald shot JFK without firing a rifle at all. I've already linked to the evidence but I guess you aren't smart enough to read or honest enough to admit you are so wrong.
Never said it was. I did say that Oswald didn't bring his pistol (aka gun) with him to the TSBD that morning. Yet after he shot JFK with his rifle, he took precious time out to go home and get it. Thus, it wasn't important before he shot JFK but became important after he did. To me, this is indicative of something changing between the the time he decided to kill JFK and the time after he pulled the trigger.First of all a gun is not a rifle....
I think any reasonable person would come to that same conclusion.
False.the Warren Commission claim that Oswald bought the rifle in question
No. Oswald bought the rifle.is unproven and cannot be proven. It was bought by mail order. Anyone under any name could have bought that rifle....
And then falsify a picture of him holding the rifle, falsify his bringing the rifle to work that day, falsify the DPD finding the rifle where he worked...if someone wanted to frame oswald....it would have been very easy for them to rent a po box in his name and buy the rifle to make it appear that Oswald bought the rifle.
You're incredibly wrong about that.
The majority of the American People do not believe the b.s. you and the warren commission spout thus....that places you and your opinion in the cheap seats with all the other dupes.
Oh? Please give us a competing narrative of what happened then. I'm sure you have a much better explanation.
The floor is yours. Go.
Insane comment.The fact that Oswald did not bring his pistol to work but after JFK was assassinated he went directly home and got it....indicates two things...........first he did not shoot JFK...if he had been planning on doing that he most likely would have brought his pistol with him to work....as in it might come in handy during his flight from the scene.
That actually has some plausibility in and of itself. Still, the building would be locked down and the safest place to be in would be in the TSBD.Secondly.....after the assassination he suddenly felt he needed it because he realized he had been set up....and they might come after him next...thus he went home and got it for protection.
At this point he no doubt was utterly terrified as well as confused ....realizing he had gotten himself into the tragic trap of being a Patsy....and for him to be a patsy he would have had to be under the direction of someone....at the very least of getting a job at the school book depository...that had to be arranged by someone....the paines apparantly sent him there to apply for the job....but how did they know about the job opening?...were they part of the plot or just innocent dupes?....did someone tell them to make sure Oswald applied for that job?
How Oswald was involved with the folks who actually shot JFK will probably never be known.
When you see the pictures of Oswald he is obviously very,very angry....why? Most likely because he realized someone he trusted had turned on him and set him up. Why else would he be angry?....if had actually been the shooter as described by the W.C. as someone who just suddenly decided to shoot JFK for the fame, glory or whatever....why would he be angry?...makes no sense...in that scenario he would have been proud and happy to have accomplished his mission.
There are some who believed Oswald had been hypnotized by David Ferrie who Jim Garrision thought was involved with the plot....he had the ability to hypnotize people.
Again, and this is very important to understand......the rifle was bought via mail order.....as I have explained before.....anyone could have rented a po box in oswalds name and ordered the rifle via mail order though the name used was hillel or something like that...apparantly a fake name oswald used....and it would have been even more clever of those who framed oswald to use a fictious name that oswald was known to use...as in it would appear to the authorities he was trying to hide the fact he had bought the rifle. Very clever...whoever framed Oswald was undoubtedly involved in intelligence work.
The picture of Oswald holding the rifle could have been easily arranged by someone....it makes no sense that Oswald would leave the picture lying around and then go shoot JFK with the same rifle he posed with....unless he wanted to be caught which he obviously did not.
Most likely someone persuaded him to pose with the rifle. Not even to mention the controversy of whether the rifle found was a Mauser or the Italian rifle....at first it was identified as a Mauser.
And in fact even if he owned the rifle, had bought it and had taken it to the book depository as claimed....does not prove he was the triggerman.
I read somewhere that he had brought the curtain rods to give to a fellow employee who needed some....which if true the employee most likely would not admit to it for fear of getting involved.
Also to think that an assassin would try to pose a rifle off as curtain rods is rather ridiculous...he would have had to known that in the investigation following the shooting that such a package would be construed to be the manner he got the rifle into the building.
They might have told him to bring the rifle to work giving some excuse or reason to do so...perhaps to buy it or whatever.
I do not think it makes any sense for him to have known what it would be used for....if he knew that...he would never have brought it to work with him because as an employee in the book depository he would have understood he would have been a prime suspect and with his communist background very likely convicted because at that time there was a visceral hatred of communists in society as a whole.
Or it could be he did not even know JFK would be passing by the book depository.
And the claim that Oswald hid the rifle is ridiculous....to leave it by the window that it was fired out of and simply cover it up is not hiding a rifle....a kid might have hidden it that way....but anyone with even average i.q. would have known that it would be easily found...I have no doubt though the rifle was left there by the real assassin to be found in order to easily make it appear Oswald was the shooter.
Also why did he go to the theater after the assassination....was he supposed to meet someone there? Or was it just that he knew the authorities would find out where he lived very quickly so he could not stay at home....thus he had to get out quickly...so he took off...not having any refuge ....he wandered around and decided to hide in the Theater while he thought about what he should do.
All this certainly indicates he had no plan.....thus not the shooter....as in if he had been the shooter he would have had some kind of plan to escape.
To sum up...no real proof Oswald actually bought the rifle.
No proof Oswald was in possession of the rifle on the day of the shooting.
No real proof that Oswald transported the rifle to the book depository...the rifle was not seen in his possession.
No real proof that Oswald was the triggerman.
Oswald was given two separate types of tests to detect gun powder residue on his hands and cheeks.The test that you're referring to would produce some false positives and false negatives.
The presence or lack thereof is not conclusive evidence.
No. Oswald denied carrying anything but his lunch. Why would he bring curtain rods to work? Did Lee Harvey Oswald Carry Curtain Rods? : The JFK AssassinationPS: Did anyone ever find the curtain rods in the TSBD? I imagine you have some evidence where they found them.... your move.
Again, the testing is not foolproof.Oswald was given two separate types of tests to detect gun powder residue on his hands and cheeks.The test that you're referring to would produce some false positives and false negatives.
The presence or lack thereof is not conclusive evidence.
Both were negative. Summary of Results from Oswald's Paraffin Tests
No. Oswald denied carrying anything but his lunch. Why would he bring curtain rods to work? Did Lee Harvey Oswald Carry Curtain Rods? : The JFK AssassinationPS: Did anyone ever find the curtain rods in the TSBD? I imagine you have some evidence where they found them.... your move.
