Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Insane, is still trying to push the same fake story from the extreme Left websites.
Even "your man" in the video does not make the this claim.
But, hey lets have a full investigation and if some right wing hack did it then I will damn them with you.
To blame the right for this and at the same time not want a full investigation, only makes one look foolish and hypocritical
Since when are CNN and the New York Daily News "extreme left web sites"???
Seriously dude, seek help.
Really the truth is "Who cares?"
But because the Dums have made this kind of nonsense the basis for their attacks on the GOP it is delightful to see them hoist by their own petard.
And that's the point.
The Dems have played this game for a long time. It's quite amusing to see Karma Bitch Slap them.
Oh you mean like the time they impeached a President for a blow job?
Oh wait..that was the republicans.
I think it would be the business of all the American people to know what a Congressman is or isnt doing don't you?
And werent you just saying it wasn't him? Isn't it interesting how your goal post suddenly shifted when I asked a simple question to your point.
apparently he has not asked the fbi to investigate, *shrugs* why not? that begs the question in that if he attests to a hack and its found to be a lie, hes cooked.
I don't think he should lose his seat either, the voters will decide that....and of course hes not a hypocrite becasue he never said he wouldn't electronically flash someone....
Since when are CNN and the New York Daily News "extreme left web sites"???
Seriously dude, seek help.
Since when are they extreme right?
"dude". man up when one of your leaders gets caught
Blaming the right for this is falling into the "tin foil" hat theory of politics - "I see Republicans everywhere"
And that's the point.
The Dems have played this game for a long time. It's quite amusing to see Karma Bitch Slap them.
Oh you mean like the time they impeached a President for a blow job?
Oh wait..that was the republicans.
I am sure that getting blow jobs from a staffer in the White House is fine with a bottom feeder like you, but Clinton was impeached for lying under oath to a Federal Grand Jury and obstruction of justice. He should be serving time.
I think it would be the business of all the American people to know what a Congressman is or isnt doing don't you?
And werent you just saying it wasn't him? Isn't it interesting how your goal post suddenly shifted when I asked a simple question to your point.
No, no I don't.
A congressman has a right to a personal life where his marriage and sexuality is concerned, just like everyone else.
There are only 3 exceptions to this rule:
1. If his personal life interferes with his duties as a congressman,
2. If his personal life exposes him as a hypocrite to the ideals that he expressed in order to get elected (in this case that would be running on a "Sanctity of Marriage" campaign)
or
3. If his personal life involved some sort of criminal act committed by him
Since none of these would be the case, it's none of your business.
And my goal post didn't shift, I asked a simple question in response to your post.
I think it would be the business of all the American people to know what a Congressman is or isnt doing don't you?
And werent you just saying it wasn't him? Isn't it interesting how your goal post suddenly shifted when I asked a simple question to your point.
No, no I don't.
A congressman has a right to a personal life where his marriage and sexuality is concerned, just like everyone else.
There are only 3 exceptions to this rule:
1. If his personal life interferes with his duties as a congressman,
2. If his personal life exposes him as a hypocrite to the ideals that he expressed in order to get elected (in this case that would be running on a "Sanctity of Marriage" campaign)
or
3. If his personal life involved some sort of criminal act committed by him
Since none of these would be the case, it's none of your business.
And my goal post didn't shift, I asked a simple question in response to your post.
Well, he's acting pretty stupidly, guilty or not.
We shall see.
If he didn't do it, whoever did should be in trouble.
Oh you mean like the time they impeached a President for a blow job?
Oh wait..that was the republicans.
I am sure that getting blow jobs from a staffer in the White House is fine with a bottom feeder like you, but Clinton was impeached for lying under oath to a Federal Grand Jury and obstruction of justice. He should be serving time.
for lying about an affair at a deposition he should never have been forced to take?
let me know when he lies to start a war.
Sending unwanted or unsolicited sexual photos over the internet is a crime. In fact, depending on the reason, there could even be a hate crime here.
If you don't believe me send the same kind of pictures to people without asking them, see what happens?
Oh wait, you may do that now, we understand your confusion
As for your goals, he is a hypocrite with the passage of bills
As for the rest, well we would need more investigation for those...
Of course, you are just content wearing your tin foil hat and blaming the republicans, so I don't if you want that
Oh you mean like the time they impeached a President for a blow job?
Oh wait..that was the republicans.
I am sure that getting blow jobs from a staffer in the White House is fine with a bottom feeder like you, but Clinton was impeached for lying under oath to a Federal Grand Jury and obstruction of justice. He should be serving time.
for lying about an affair at a deposition he should never hatve been forced to take?
let me know when he lies to start a war.
I am sure that getting blow jobs from a staffer in the White House is fine with a bottom feeder like you, but Clinton was impeached for lying under oath to a Federal Grand Jury and obstruction of justice. He should be serving time.
for lying about an affair at a deposition he should never hatve been forced to take?
let me know when he lies to start a war.
What you just stated is that Presidents are above the law. Not true! And when you can find a lie that was told to start a war, post it.
Sending unwanted or unsolicited sexual photos over the internet is a crime. In fact, depending on the reason, there could even be a hate crime here.
If you don't believe me send the same kind of pictures to people without asking them, see what happens?
Oh wait, you may do that now, we understand your confusion
As for your goals, he is a hypocrite with the passage of bills
As for the rest, well we would need more investigation for those...
Of course, you are just content wearing your tin foil hat and blaming the republicans, so I don't if you want that
Did the woman in question try to blame Mr Weiner? Has she filed a complaint with the authorities?
No, she has not.
Therefore, there is no crime.
And what bills?
And what exactly would be the reason for investigating the private lives of two citizens, when no crime has been committed?
Are you implying that the authorities should investigate people any time an incident of this nature occurs on the internet? Because that would be a very interesting statement to make.
Especially since anyone who has re-posted said picture on any site that was available to the public would be culpable for the very same crime...
Now that you have established the Clinton rule book of political ethics for Democrats, what is the one for Republicans?
Sending unwanted or unsolicited sexual photos over the internet is a crime. In fact, depending on the reason, there could even be a hate crime here.
If you don't believe me send the same kind of pictures to people without asking them, see what happens?
Oh wait, you may do that now, we understand your confusion
As for your goals, he is a hypocrite with the passage of bills
As for the rest, well we would need more investigation for those...
Of course, you are just content wearing your tin foil hat and blaming the republicans, so I don't if you want that
Did the woman in question try to blame Mr Weiner? Has she filed a complaint with the authorities?
No, she has not.
Therefore, there is no crime.
And what bills?
And what exactly would be the reason for investigating the private lives of two citizens, when no crime has been committed?
Are you implying that the authorities should investigate people any time an incident of this nature occurs on the internet? Because that would be a very interesting statement to make.
Especially since anyone who has re-posted said picture on any site that was available to the public would be culpable for the very same crime...
Now that you have established the Clinton rule book of political ethics for Democrats, what is the one for Republicans?
The rule book is exactly the same for everyone.
Sen Craig, for instance, committed a crime in a public bathroom, and was a hypocrite for his previous stance on homosexuality, thus fitting two of the criteria.
Now that you have established the Clinton rule book of political ethics for Democrats, what is the one for Republicans?
The rule book is exactly the same for everyone.
Sen Craig, for instance, committed a crime in a public bathroom, and was a hypocrite for his previous stance on homosexuality, thus fitting two of the criteria.
