Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are more closely related to the coyote than the thylacine is.
Fun fact.
Yep. And marsupials split from placentals between 125 and 160 million years ago.[Bing Crosby voice] "No damn thymine has anything on my Taz"[/Bing Crosby voice] ... I looked it up, rodents and carnivores split during the late Cretaceous ... or so says Wiki ...
Why cats bite, we're just big rats ...
who was there to observe and document that??Yep. And marsupials split from placentals between 125 and 160 million years ago.
You forgot to include the species Trogolodytes Darwinius
It's not much of an insult to call someone an ape, when you are an ape.Oh, a family album I see abu afak which one is you?
that claim of DNA hasnt been proven ...
Ape's cannot write English, therefore I am not an Ape.It's not much of an insult to call someone an ape, when you are an ape.
That's what is called "unsound logic", as it is based on a false premise. And ironically enough, you just proved it wrong by writing a post, since you are indeed an ape.Ape's cannot write English, therefore I am not an Ape.
how do they know they are duplicating it right or at all since no one in human history has ever observed it happening??We have laboratory experiments with fruit flies you can duplicate in your local high school biology lab ... we know the 3-dimensional structure of these macromolecules ... and we can calculate the chemical reactions that are occurring ...
1) DNA regulates all cell functions, through catalysts ... everything ...
2) DNA is responsible for almost all inherited traits, why children resemble their parents ...
3) DNA changes over time ... and we have billions of years ...
This is theoretically sound and we have a wealth of laboratory experiments that will demonstrate each and every one of these claims ... as long as we have these billions of years to work with ...
This doesn't happen in 6,000 years ... and alpha helices won't spin the correct way on a Flat Earth ... and God forbid dog breeders ... can't evolve a St Johns Dog now can we? ...
So pick one's preferred common ancestor and we are that? Very well so we are all rats then.That's what is called "unsound logic", as it is based on a false premise. And ironically enough, you just proved it wrong by writing a post, since you are indeed an ape.
I have no idea where you get your non sequiturs.So pick one's preferred common ancestor and we are that?
who was there to observe and document that??
asking for a friend,,
Here's an interesting debate - two eminent biologists debating the idea of the "selfish gene", always refreshing to see controversy in science.
DNA is not a person that can observe anything,,DNA ...
I have no idea where you get your non sequiturs.
Any two species share many common ancestors.
Clades are not arbitrary. You are an ape. As was the most recent common ancestor of all apes.
DNA is not a person that can observe anything,,
