What many people are missing regarding the 2020, 2022 and 2024 US House races: Narrowing of the Efficiency Gap

Dante

Chriis Murphy "cerebral and serious"
Joined
Dec 1, 2008
Messages
76,876
Reaction score
29,395
Points
2,260
Location
Location: corpus callosum
What many people are missing regarding the 2020 and 2024 US House races: Narrowing of the Efficiency Gap

Hereā€™s another assumption punctured by the 2024 election: that gerrymandering and Democratic vote-clustering give Republicans a structural advantage in the battle for control of the House of Representatives.

For more than two decades, the House was consistently biased in Republicansā€™ favor. Votes cast for GOP candidates translated into congressional seats more efficiently than did votes for Democrats. In 2012, most dramatically, Republicans won a majority of more than 30 seats with a minority of the aggregate nationwide vote. Political observers debated whether this skew was ā€œnaturalā€ ā€” a by-product of the countryā€™s political geography ā€” or the result of Republican gerrymandering. But few doubted that the House was, in fact, tilted to the right.

Now, that fixture of American politics is gone. In the 2022 and 2024 elections, according to standard measures of partisan bias, the House exhibited no pro-Republican lean at all. Of course, Republicans won narrow majorities in 2022 and 2024. But they did so because they won narrow pluralities of the total House vote. For the first time in a generation, both Republicansā€™ control of the chamber and their slim governing margins accurately reflected votersā€™ preferences.


efficiency gap.webp


It's amazing how little people actually pay attention to the nuts and bolts of elections. We can look at the most recent election in House races 2024. The narratives that Democrats got swamped is patently false. It's amusing that some media have things a bit skewed. More amusing is people who attack the media as unreliable and biased, quote that same media on perceived GOP gains and Dem losses.

Despite talk of drop-off in blue states, Democratsā€™ most impressive gains came in New York (4th, 19th and 22nd Congressional Districts) and California (13th, 27th and 45th Congressional Districts). How did they do it?

Democrats did better than Harris downballot, providing glimmer of hope

Democrats minimized Senate losses and created possible gains in House, leaving key questions: Why did Harris and GOP candidates underperform?

November 9, 2024
 
What many people are missing regarding the 2020 and 2024 US House races: Narrowing of the Efficiency Gap

Hereā€™s another assumption punctured by the 2024 election: that gerrymandering and Democratic vote-clustering give Republicans a structural advantage in the battle for control of the House of Representatives.

For more than two decades, the House was consistently biased in Republicansā€™ favor. Votes cast for GOP candidates translated into congressional seats more efficiently than did votes for Democrats. In 2012, most dramatically, Republicans won a majority of more than 30 seats with a minority of the aggregate nationwide vote. Political observers debated whether this skew was ā€œnaturalā€ ā€” a by-product of the countryā€™s political geography ā€” or the result of Republican gerrymandering. But few doubted that the House was, in fact, tilted to the right.

Now, that fixture of American politics is gone. In the 2022 and 2024 elections, according to standard measures of partisan bias, the House exhibited no pro-Republican lean at all. Of course, Republicans won narrow majorities in 2022 and 2024. But they did so because they won narrow pluralities of the total House vote. For the first time in a generation, both Republicansā€™ control of the chamber and their slim governing margins accurately reflected votersā€™ preferences.


View attachment 1085497

It's amazing how little people actually pay attention to the nuts and bolts of elections. We can look at the most recent election in House races 2024. The narratives that Democrats got swamped is patently false. It's amusing that some media have things a bit skewed. More amusing is people who attack the media as unreliable and biased, quote that same media on perceived GOP gains and Dem losses.

Despite talk of drop-off in blue states, Democratsā€™ most impressive gains came in New York (4th, 19th and 22nd Congressional Districts) and California (13th, 27th and 45th Congressional Districts). How did they do it?

Democrats did better than Harris downballot, providing glimmer of hope

Democrats minimized Senate losses and created possible gains in House, leaving key questions: Why did Harris and GOP candidates underperform?

November 9, 2024
1741054413260.webp
 
What many people are missing regarding the 2020 and 2024 US House races: Narrowing of the Efficiency Gap

Hereā€™s another assumption punctured by the 2024 election: that gerrymandering and Democratic vote-clustering give Republicans a structural advantage in the battle for control of the House of Representatives.

For more than two decades, the House was consistently biased in Republicansā€™ favor. Votes cast for GOP candidates translated into congressional seats more efficiently than did votes for Democrats. In 2012, most dramatically, Republicans won a majority of more than 30 seats with a minority of the aggregate nationwide vote. Political observers debated whether this skew was ā€œnaturalā€ ā€” a by-product of the countryā€™s political geography ā€” or the result of Republican gerrymandering. But few doubted that the House was, in fact, tilted to the right.

Now, that fixture of American politics is gone. In the 2022 and 2024 elections, according to standard measures of partisan bias, the House exhibited no pro-Republican lean at all. Of course, Republicans won narrow majorities in 2022 and 2024. But they did so because they won narrow pluralities of the total House vote. For the first time in a generation, both Republicansā€™ control of the chamber and their slim governing margins accurately reflected votersā€™ preferences.


View attachment 1085497

It's amazing how little people actually pay attention to the nuts and bolts of elections. We can look at the most recent election in House races 2024. The narratives that Democrats got swamped is patently false. It's amusing that some media have things a bit skewed. More amusing is people who attack the media as unreliable and biased, quote that same media on perceived GOP gains and Dem losses.

Despite talk of drop-off in blue states, Democratsā€™ most impressive gains came in New York (4th, 19th and 22nd Congressional Districts) and California (13th, 27th and 45th Congressional Districts). How did they do it?

Democrats did better than Harris downballot, providing glimmer of hope

Democrats minimized Senate losses and created possible gains in House, leaving key questions: Why did Harris and GOP candidates underperform?

November 9, 2024
Sure seems to me dem dare dems be some racissss
 
And yet those same people who followed politics closely did not vote for Democrats just a few days later.
When was voting Day 2024?
Uhm, your mental illness is showing.


Nov. 18, 2024, 1:00 PM PST
By Mark Murray
Vice President Kamala Harris and Democrats convinced frequent voters and highly engaged voters to stick with them in the 2024 presidential election.

Their problem: They lost with most everyone else.
 


After their defeat in 2024, Democratic strategists tell NBC News that the party must do a better job communicating with these less-engaged voters and prevent itself from getting trapped in a bubble.

ā€œOne of the main takeaways from this cycle is that the Democratic Party has a lot of work to do on how weā€™re reaching voters,ā€ Democratic strategist Christina Freundlich said. ā€œWe lost the persuasion game.ā€

Steve Schale, a veteran Florida-based Democratic strategist who worked on Barack Obama's presidential campaigns and for a pro-Joe Biden super PAC in the 2020 campaign, takes the criticism of his party even further.

"We donā€™t have authentic messengers," he said. "We avoid the communication channels where many of these voters get their information.

"And, fair or unfair, our brand among many of these voters is defined by the most extreme voices in our party," Schale continued, echoing a point recently made by Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania and others.
 

After their defeat in 2024, Democratic strategists tell NBC News that the party must do a better job communicating with these less-engaged voters and prevent itself from getting trapped in a bubble.

ā€œOne of the main takeaways from this cycle is that the Democratic Party has a lot of work to do on how weā€™re reaching voters,ā€ Democratic strategist Christina Freundlich said. ā€œWe lost the persuasion game.ā€

Steve Schale, a veteran Florida-based Democratic strategist who worked on Barack Obama's presidential campaigns and for a pro-Joe Biden super PAC in the 2020 campaign, takes the criticism of his party even further.

"We donā€™t have authentic messengers," he said. "We avoid the communication channels where many of these voters get their information.

"And, fair or unfair, our brand among many of these voters is defined by the most extreme voices in our party," Schale continued, echoing a point recently made by Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania and others.
Actually, the main "takeaway" from these strategists is:

1741109838479.webp


1741109856989.webp
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom