Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is links on Wikipedia, you click on them and get to a Wikipedia article. I thought you know how that works.In your post there is nothing about about how Yeltsin came to power.
Once in power they stay in power, because elections are fundamentally UNCOMPETETIVE BY DEISGN. They are a pretense.
It is links on Wikipedia, you click on them and get to a Wikipedia article. I thought you know how that works.
So, now Yeltsin is a dictator? There were no political opposition in Russia, the press and media not controlled by the government, freedom of expression etc? In the 1990s I mean.
Anton's economic recovery plan for Russia consists of privatizing every public resource and asset, the commonwealth of the Russian people, placing it in the hands of billionaires, so that they keep the profits for themselves, depositing the money abroad, raping Russia again as they did in the 1990s, before Putin. Putin as bad as he is, managed to save Russia and your plan is to throw Russia back into the economic hell of the 1990s.Those links are about a person in power, staying in power, by winning an uncompetetive election.
In the 90's everyone tuned into the same 8pm Kremlin news they are tunning in today.
No, those links are about elections in Russia when Bill the Pants-Off was their best friend and buddies with Yeltsin.Those links are about a person in power, staying in power, by winning an uncompetetive election.
In the 90's everyone tuned into the same 8pm Kremlin news they are tunning in today.
If you are going to open up with a NO, then the rest of your post should be some sort of a refute of what you've quoted.No, those links are about elections in Russia when Bill the Pants-Off was their best friend and buddies with Yeltsin.
Yeltsin the alcoholic was easy to control and manipulate. A disaster for Russia.No, those links are about elections in Russia when Bill the Pants-Off was their best friend and buddies with Yeltsin.
Sorry, don't get what 'open up with a no' means.If you are going to open up with a NO, then the rest of your post should be some sort of a refute of what you've quoted.
Anton's economic recovery plan for Russia consists of privatizing every public resource and asset, the commonwealth of the Russian people, placing it in the hands of billionaires, so that they keep the profits for themselves, depositing the money abroad, raping Russia again as they did in the 1990s, before Putin. Putin as bad as he is, managed to save Russia and your plan is to throw Russia back into the economic hell of the 1990s.
Yes, and that is why they have a bad taste for 'liberal democracy'. But now it turns out to be that Yeltsin had an authoritarian regime too. According to our friend Anton, at least. Go figure.Yeltsin the alcoholic was easy to control and manipulate. A disaster for Russia.
You said NO, but the rest of your post didn't refute what I've said in any way.Sorry, don't get what 'open up with a no' means.
I said no because I didn't agree with your claims. That the elections were uncompetitive.You said NO, but the rest of your post didn't refute what I've said in any way.
I said no because I didn't agree with your claims. That the elections were uncompetitive.
Because the state didn't have a repressive apparatus on the scale it has now. Or this apparatus was dysfunctional already (I mean the Soviet apparatus in 1991). You do get that in 1991 Yeltsin was virtually a candidate from opposition, right?What makes you think they were competetive?
I would love to have all of that here in the USA:No dummy, the "plan" is very simple - give people fundamental democratic freedoms and they willl figuire out the rest for themselves.
Freedom to organize a political movement.
Freedom to protest without repressions.
Freedom to participate in the elections.
Freedom to make public statements on independent media sources.
Freedom to have your case heard by an independent court.
This is what degenerates like you are effectively against.
I would love to have all of that here in the USA:
He was opposed to Gorbachev. I've seen the footage of them debating in the Съезд Советов/Congress Of Soviets. Most Russians in Russia regret the collapse of the USSR.Because the state didn't have a repressive apparatus on the scale it has now. Or this apparatus was dysfunctional already (I mean the Soviet apparatus in 1991). You do get that in 1991 Yeltsin was virtually a candidate from opposition, right?
You're the crazy pearl-clutching nutbag, not me.Oh go fuck yourself nutbag.
We have ALL of that.
Yes, he was. But our friend Antoshka is trying to build a parallel reality about that.He was opposed to Gorbachev. I've seen the footage of them debating in the Съезд Советов/Congress Of Soviets. Most Russians in Russia regret the collapse of the USSR.
