Where Are The Arguments Against America First?

[Curried Goats]

You don’t have an understanding of how the uniparty works.

You just have a shit argument. There there.

Also you seem a little emo. I don't subscribe to the political nihilism that seems to have infected you broken people.

 

[gipper]

You just have a shit argument. There there.

Also you seem a little emo. I don't subscribe to the political nihilism that seems to have infected you broken people.

I’m sorry but I have no interest in educating you of the obvious.

 

[Curried Goats]

I’m sorry but I have no interest in educating you of the obvious.

Or explaining what you mean because you're probably incapable. Maybe think these things through before you share them as insights....

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Have you noticed? In the Media, on the TV, in the Web or here on USMB, every discussion, every heated argument, every thread is against TRUMP! Not only do you never see any JUSTIFICATION for what exactly it is the Harris would do, her POLICIES that would be so much better than Trump's plans, but nothing criticizing Trump plans!

Or anything he actually DID when president. The entire election debate by the Left has been made PERSONAL.

It is all aimed at THE MAN HIMSELF. Trump. You know, that fat, overweight, orange golfer who eats poorly and used to camp around with international models. Every attack is either against HIM or his SUPPORTERS.

You know, those awful, DEPLORABLE, country hicks, hillbillies, backwoods people who have never even had electricity who drive horse-drawn wagons and sleep with their cousins who support Trump. Still living in the 19th century. It is the same bias they cleverly disguised in the 1960s as The Beverly Hillbillies and in the 1970s with Archie Bunker.

In the vernacular of logic, we call that an AD HOMINEM attack--- attacking not the message but the MESSENGER. This is a fallacious argument, it is a personal rather than logical argument first recognized and defined by Aristotle himself. It is a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged attribute of the opponent's character or background.

We have seen it all here countless times by people like Mac1958 and numerous others.

This is the Left. This is the substance of the entire case against Trump (and his supporters). That is the basis of the entire "cult" argument, that by minimizing or delegitimizing the people themselves, you avoid the argument itself. Basically, those attacking Trump, their entire case is: "We didn't like him in 2016 and we still don't like him now." Even when they manage to point to some event, it isn't actually about anything that Trump or his supporters themselves really did, but a situation THE LEFT CREATED that merely INVOLVED Trump or his supporters that they created or drew these people into as a result of their embittered dislike of him.

I dare the Left to present an actual argument here that ISN'T about Trump the man or his supporters! But they cannot. They never do. Worse, they use this same crutch, JUST AS WITH JOE BIDEN in 2020, as their ENTIRE CASE FOR SUPPORTING KAMALA HARRIS. I mean, was there ever a single time since 2020 that you ever heard anyone say: "Gee, instead of Joe, I sure wish we had Harris as president instead?"

The entire case AGAINST Trump or FOR Harris, it is all based on a cleverly disguised leftwing fallacy. This is the core of the means of defeating Kamala Harris at the voting polls--- The Left actually have NO REAL ARGUMENT as to why Trump shouldn't be president or that Harris should be, other than THEY JUST DON'T LIKE HIM.

Ad hominem - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

View attachment 1026596

What will follow in this thread is leftist feeeeeelllzzz

 

[gipper]

Or explaining what you mean because you're probably incapable. Maybe think these things through before you share them as insights....

I’m certain you think voting for K will fix things. Lol.

 

[dudmuck]

The "bad fruit" in America is people who came here from shit hole countries.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

He was pressured and he folded. Oh fucking well. I love how you Republicans are more hurt over that than anyone else.


Soys....

You’re confusing laughing with hurt.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Completely ridiculous.

 

[Curried Goats]

I’m certain you think voting for K will fix things. Lol.

Because yours is an argument about your fantasies and imagination. I never said anything about Kamala fixing everything or even anything so I don't know where you could of gotten that other than your imagination.

 

[Curried Goats]

You’re confusing laughing with hurt.

How funny is going to seem if Kamala wins?

 

[pknopp]

The only reality you stated is a totally unsupportable, subjective, appeal to the gallery. You are right because you SAY you are right. Fallacy. Pathetic.
You are finished.

And yet you agreed that neither are worthy of the office. I find it odd how many times people argue I am wrong while agreeing with me.

 

[pknopp]

That's the closest you'll ever get to a Democrat admitting that sKamala sucks..

I'm not a Democrat and I've long condemned Harris.

Sadly there are many like yourself that has been brainwashed into believing everything is red or blue with no other options.

 

[dudmuck]

Completely ridiculous.

history is easy to find.

 

[otto105]

No, you do

I want clean elections

You want chaos

Show the fraud then fuckup

 

[Mac-7]

Show the fraud then fuckup

I cant prove the election was stolen

But the process is so flawed that you cant prove it wasnt stolen either

I want a system that no one can question

 

[Marener]

I cant prove the election was stolen

But the process is so flawed that you cant prove it wasnt stolen either

I want a system that no one can question

There is no such thing as a system that no one can question. For christ sake, people question whether the world is round. The system doesn’t matter when a big chunk of the country is totally delusional.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

history is easy to find.

Unless you’re a statue.

 

[Mac-7]

There is no such thing as a system that no one can question. For christ sake, people question whether the world is round. The system doesn’t matter when a big chunk of the country is totally delusional.

Americans used to have more faith in the process than they do now

The biggest suspicion is with mail-in ballots

But before covid voting battles were over identifying legal voters

We can do a much better job than we are doing now

 

[Marener]

Americans used to have more faith in the process than they do now

The biggest suspicion is with mail-in ballots

But before covid voting battles were over identifying legal voters

We can do a much better job than we are doing now

Americans used to have leaders that cared about the health of the nation more than their own electoral victory. Trump cultivates this distrust because he personally benefits from it.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

How funny is going to seem if Kamala wins?

If Kummie wins it will be hilarious watching you leftards cover her incompetence. Just like with Which Storm *Joe and Beer Summit Obama.