excalibur
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 24,586
- 48,849
- 2,290
Not only are they defending the illegal action of the judge, they want more of it.
We have one Wisconsin state legislator saying it is okay for a judge to violate the laws.
We have the Governor openly advocating not to help ICE, in spite of Federal laws superseding any state laws per Article VI Supremacy Clause.
Why are Democrats openly rebelling, as in 1861, to protect illegal aliens? Well, at the very least, illegals get counted for purposes of apportionment (hopefully Congress will change that).
We do know Democrats in many places advocate illegals voting in city or town elections, and have passed laws to that effect in several localities (NYC's attempt was tossed by that state's highest court).
We have one Wisconsin state legislator saying it is okay for a judge to violate the laws.
We have the Governor openly advocating not to help ICE, in spite of Federal laws superseding any state laws per Article VI Supremacy Clause.
Why are Democrats openly rebelling, as in 1861, to protect illegal aliens? Well, at the very least, illegals get counted for purposes of apportionment (hopefully Congress will change that).
We do know Democrats in many places advocate illegals voting in city or town elections, and have passed laws to that effect in several localities (NYC's attempt was tossed by that state's highest court).