Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
America was founded as an explicitly WHITE nation of individuals. Individualism only has any chance of working in a 90%+ white nation.No I didn’t.This is why the traditional right lost.There are six forms of governance that require the bending of the knee and the neck to government.
These six are actually only a single way of governing, the collectivist way: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism and Progressivism, believing that government knows best. All six forms of socialism are simple variations on a theme: the individual must be subverted to the collective.
The alternative is capitalism, and free markets, based on individualism. “… the perennial question of European civilization: the individual versus the state. “Man is not ordained to the body politic, according to all that he is and has,” Thomas Aquinas wrote; “and so it does not follow that every action of his acquires merit or demerit in relation to the body politic.” NYSun
There are only two choices:
“There is simply no other choice than this: either to abstain from interference in the free play of the market, or to delegate the entire management of production and distribution to the government.
Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way.”
Books / Digital Text
1.Government schooling functions via ‘Mushroom Management,” keep ‘em in the dark and feed ‘em manure. The result is that a large number of their graduates imagine that there is a difference between Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism and Progressivism. Polls show many such government school grads actually favor socialism over capitalism.
…..all six of ‘em fit these criterion: the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Liberals, in my experience, are fearful folks who need the bodyguard of big government because they are vulnerable, battered emotional hypochondriacs....they need to insure themselves against every societal misadventure that could occur. They call that 'empathy,' but it's actually neurosis. They have some sort of metaphorical bullet lodged near their heart, just waiting for a slight move which will end it all! Thus, the overwhelming feeling of incipient failure, and apprehension. And, recognizing their own weakness, they lash out at those willing to depend on themselves.
They need the god called government and they worship same.
Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.
Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.
People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.
You couldn't be more wrong.
You could attempt to be, but you wouldn't be successful.
You've just endorsed slavery.
Individualists endorse slavery.
You want individuals to compete against groups, lose to those groups and then refuse to form their own groups when their well-being depends on it.
THAT is slavery.
"Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature."
Mull this over: if you were anywhere near correct, why was it necessary for the socialists/communists/fascists/Progressives to slaughter over 100 million men, women, and children in the last century to advance their views.
Clearly it is far, far, from 'human nature.'
In fact, the Left denies that there is a 'human nature.'
America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. None of these are possible under Fascism, Socialism, or the New Deal. All six statist programs are based on an impossibility…. changing human nature.
But, they pretend they can do it. Mussolini wrote in his 1928 autobiography:
“The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. “(p. 280)
The Communist Revolution is based on the idea of transforming human nature. “The New Soviet man or New Soviet person as postulated by the ideologists of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was an archetype of a person with certain qualities that were said to be emerging as dominant among all citizens of the Soviet Union, irrespective of the country's long-standing cultural, ethnic, and linguistic diversity, creating a single Soviet people, Soviet nation.[1]
New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Leon Trotsky wrote in his Literature and Revolution [2] :
"The human species, the sluggish Homo sapiens, will once again enter the stage of radical reconstruction and become in his own hands the object of the most complex methods of artificial selection and psychophysical training... Man will make it his goal...to create a higher sociobiological type, a superman, if you will" New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Progressives have a similar view: human nature is plastic; politics is a means of perfecting man!
In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html_____
That’s why they claim a man can become a woman and vice versa by simply wishing it.
Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Fascism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, LF
America was founded as an explicitly WHITE nation of individuals. Individualism only has any chance of working in a 90%+ white nation.No I didn’t.This is why the traditional right lost.There are six forms of governance that require the bending of the knee and the neck to government.
These six are actually only a single way of governing, the collectivist way: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism and Progressivism, believing that government knows best. All six forms of socialism are simple variations on a theme: the individual must be subverted to the collective.
The alternative is capitalism, and free markets, based on individualism. “… the perennial question of European civilization: the individual versus the state. “Man is not ordained to the body politic, according to all that he is and has,” Thomas Aquinas wrote; “and so it does not follow that every action of his acquires merit or demerit in relation to the body politic.” NYSun
There are only two choices:
“There is simply no other choice than this: either to abstain from interference in the free play of the market, or to delegate the entire management of production and distribution to the government.
Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way.”
Books / Digital Text
1.Government schooling functions via ‘Mushroom Management,” keep ‘em in the dark and feed ‘em manure. The result is that a large number of their graduates imagine that there is a difference between Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism and Progressivism. Polls show many such government school grads actually favor socialism over capitalism.
…..all six of ‘em fit these criterion: the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Liberals, in my experience, are fearful folks who need the bodyguard of big government because they are vulnerable, battered emotional hypochondriacs....they need to insure themselves against every societal misadventure that could occur. They call that 'empathy,' but it's actually neurosis. They have some sort of metaphorical bullet lodged near their heart, just waiting for a slight move which will end it all! Thus, the overwhelming feeling of incipient failure, and apprehension. And, recognizing their own weakness, they lash out at those willing to depend on themselves.
They need the god called government and they worship same.
Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.
Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.
People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.
You couldn't be more wrong.
You could attempt to be, but you wouldn't be successful.
You've just endorsed slavery.
Individualists endorse slavery.
You want individuals to compete against groups, lose to those groups and then refuse to form their own groups when their well-being depends on it.
THAT is slavery.
"Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature."
Mull this over: if you were anywhere near correct, why was it necessary for the socialists/communists/fascists/Progressives to slaughter over 100 million men, women, and children in the last century to advance their views.
Clearly it is far, far, from 'human nature.'
In fact, the Left denies that there is a 'human nature.'
America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. None of these are possible under Fascism, Socialism, or the New Deal. All six statist programs are based on an impossibility…. changing human nature.
But, they pretend they can do it. Mussolini wrote in his 1928 autobiography:
“The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. “(p. 280)
The Communist Revolution is based on the idea of transforming human nature. “The New Soviet man or New Soviet person as postulated by the ideologists of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was an archetype of a person with certain qualities that were said to be emerging as dominant among all citizens of the Soviet Union, irrespective of the country's long-standing cultural, ethnic, and linguistic diversity, creating a single Soviet people, Soviet nation.[1]
New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Leon Trotsky wrote in his Literature and Revolution [2] :
"The human species, the sluggish Homo sapiens, will once again enter the stage of radical reconstruction and become in his own hands the object of the most complex methods of artificial selection and psychophysical training... Man will make it his goal...to create a higher sociobiological type, a superman, if you will" New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Progressives have a similar view: human nature is plastic; politics is a means of perfecting man!
In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html_____
That’s why they claim a man can become a woman and vice versa by simply wishing it.
Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Fascism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, LF
And btw, fascism was created to fight COMMUNISM. The people created their own collective to fight another collective because that is the only way to beat a collective.
America was founded as an explicitly WHITE nation of individuals. Individualism only has any chance of working in a 90%+ white nation.No I didn’t.This is why the traditional right lost.
Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.
Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.
People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.
You couldn't be more wrong.
You could attempt to be, but you wouldn't be successful.
You've just endorsed slavery.
Individualists endorse slavery.
You want individuals to compete against groups, lose to those groups and then refuse to form their own groups when their well-being depends on it.
THAT is slavery.
"Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature."
Mull this over: if you were anywhere near correct, why was it necessary for the socialists/communists/fascists/Progressives to slaughter over 100 million men, women, and children in the last century to advance their views.
Clearly it is far, far, from 'human nature.'
In fact, the Left denies that there is a 'human nature.'
America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. None of these are possible under Fascism, Socialism, or the New Deal. All six statist programs are based on an impossibility…. changing human nature.
But, they pretend they can do it. Mussolini wrote in his 1928 autobiography:
“The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. “(p. 280)
The Communist Revolution is based on the idea of transforming human nature. “The New Soviet man or New Soviet person as postulated by the ideologists of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was an archetype of a person with certain qualities that were said to be emerging as dominant among all citizens of the Soviet Union, irrespective of the country's long-standing cultural, ethnic, and linguistic diversity, creating a single Soviet people, Soviet nation.[1]
New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Leon Trotsky wrote in his Literature and Revolution [2] :
"The human species, the sluggish Homo sapiens, will once again enter the stage of radical reconstruction and become in his own hands the object of the most complex methods of artificial selection and psychophysical training... Man will make it his goal...to create a higher sociobiological type, a superman, if you will" New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Progressives have a similar view: human nature is plastic; politics is a means of perfecting man!
In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html_____
That’s why they claim a man can become a woman and vice versa by simply wishing it.
Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Fascism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, LF
And btw, fascism was created to fight COMMUNISM. The people created their own collective to fight another collective because that is the only way to beat a collective.
Hard to believe how many mistakes you're making today.
1. The Founders put in place a system to end slavery.
2. Mussolini, Hitler, and Stalin were pals...all endorsed views that come from Hegel and Marx.
Mussolini's election to the Executive was part of the capture of control of the Socialist Party by the hard-line Marxist left, ....The shift in Socialist Party control was greeted with delight by Lenin and other revolutionaries throughout the world. From 1912 to 1914, Mussolini was the Che Guevara of his day, a living saint of leftism. Handsome, courageous, charismatic, an erudite Marxist, a riveting speaker and writer, a dedicated class warrior to the core, he was the peerless duce of the Italian Left. He looked like the head of any future Italian socialist government, elected or revolutionary.
In 1913, while still editor of Avanti!, he began to publish and edit his own journal, Utopia, a forum for controversial discussion among leftwing socialists. ...Two of those who collaborated with Mussolini on Utopia would go on to help found the Italian Communist Party and one to help found the German Communist Party.(3) Others, with Mussolini, would found the Fascist movement.
The Mystery of Fascism
by David Ramsay Steele
The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele
Communist John Dewey had the Socialist Party change its name to Liberal.
One of those interesting facts that helps verify that Hitler was as much a Leftist as Stalin is that Hitler made MayDay his Nazi holiday, too.
The Nazis sought to gain support of workers by declaring May Day, a day celebrated by organized labour, to be a paid holiday and held celebrations on 1 May 1933 to honour German workers Life and Death in the Third ReichFirst Edition Edition
byPeter Fritzsche p. 45
The regime also insisted through propaganda that all Germans take part in the May Day celebrations in the hope that this would help break down class hostility between workers and burghers.[13]Songs in praise of labour and workers were played by state radio throughout May Day as well as an airshow in Berlin and fireworks.[13]Hitler spoke of workers as patriots who had built Germany's industrial strength and had honourably served in the war and claimed that they had been oppressed undereconomic liberalism.[14]Berliner Morgenpostthat had been strongly associated with the political left in the past praised the regime's May Day celebrations.[14]
Volksgemeinschaft - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Here's Stalin's version....
And, Stalin helped Mussolini set up his May Day celebration...
'The youngest prime minister in Italian history,....Mussolini was showered with accolades from sundry quarters.... Stalin supplied Mussolini with the plans of the May Day parades in Red Square,to help him polish up his Fascist pageants....He conquered Ethiopia, madea Pact of Steel with Germany, introduced anti-Jewish measures in 1938,came into the war as Hitler's very junior partner,..." The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele
Socialist, fascists, Nazis, communists......Leftist all.
As are Progressives and Modern Liberals.
Be happy to provide a reading list for you, to bring you up to date.
Just say the word.
America was founded as an explicitly WHITE nation of individuals. Individualism only has any chance of working in a 90%+ white nation.No I didn’t.You couldn't be more wrong.
You could attempt to be, but you wouldn't be successful.
You've just endorsed slavery.
Individualists endorse slavery.
You want individuals to compete against groups, lose to those groups and then refuse to form their own groups when their well-being depends on it.
THAT is slavery.
"Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature."
Mull this over: if you were anywhere near correct, why was it necessary for the socialists/communists/fascists/Progressives to slaughter over 100 million men, women, and children in the last century to advance their views.
Clearly it is far, far, from 'human nature.'
In fact, the Left denies that there is a 'human nature.'
America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. None of these are possible under Fascism, Socialism, or the New Deal. All six statist programs are based on an impossibility…. changing human nature.
But, they pretend they can do it. Mussolini wrote in his 1928 autobiography:
“The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. “(p. 280)
The Communist Revolution is based on the idea of transforming human nature. “The New Soviet man or New Soviet person as postulated by the ideologists of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was an archetype of a person with certain qualities that were said to be emerging as dominant among all citizens of the Soviet Union, irrespective of the country's long-standing cultural, ethnic, and linguistic diversity, creating a single Soviet people, Soviet nation.[1]
New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Leon Trotsky wrote in his Literature and Revolution [2] :
"The human species, the sluggish Homo sapiens, will once again enter the stage of radical reconstruction and become in his own hands the object of the most complex methods of artificial selection and psychophysical training... Man will make it his goal...to create a higher sociobiological type, a superman, if you will" New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Progressives have a similar view: human nature is plastic; politics is a means of perfecting man!
In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html_____
That’s why they claim a man can become a woman and vice versa by simply wishing it.
Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Fascism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, LF
And btw, fascism was created to fight COMMUNISM. The people created their own collective to fight another collective because that is the only way to beat a collective.
Hard to believe how many mistakes you're making today.
1. The Founders put in place a system to end slavery.
2. Mussolini, Hitler, and Stalin were pals...all endorsed views that come from Hegel and Marx.
Mussolini's election to the Executive was part of the capture of control of the Socialist Party by the hard-line Marxist left, ....The shift in Socialist Party control was greeted with delight by Lenin and other revolutionaries throughout the world. From 1912 to 1914, Mussolini was the Che Guevara of his day, a living saint of leftism. Handsome, courageous, charismatic, an erudite Marxist, a riveting speaker and writer, a dedicated class warrior to the core, he was the peerless duce of the Italian Left. He looked like the head of any future Italian socialist government, elected or revolutionary.
In 1913, while still editor of Avanti!, he began to publish and edit his own journal, Utopia, a forum for controversial discussion among leftwing socialists. ...Two of those who collaborated with Mussolini on Utopia would go on to help found the Italian Communist Party and one to help found the German Communist Party.(3) Others, with Mussolini, would found the Fascist movement.
The Mystery of Fascism
by David Ramsay Steele
The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele
Communist John Dewey had the Socialist Party change its name to Liberal.
One of those interesting facts that helps verify that Hitler was as much a Leftist as Stalin is that Hitler made MayDay his Nazi holiday, too.
The Nazis sought to gain support of workers by declaring May Day, a day celebrated by organized labour, to be a paid holiday and held celebrations on 1 May 1933 to honour German workers Life and Death in the Third ReichFirst Edition Edition
byPeter Fritzsche p. 45
The regime also insisted through propaganda that all Germans take part in the May Day celebrations in the hope that this would help break down class hostility between workers and burghers.[13]Songs in praise of labour and workers were played by state radio throughout May Day as well as an airshow in Berlin and fireworks.[13]Hitler spoke of workers as patriots who had built Germany's industrial strength and had honourably served in the war and claimed that they had been oppressed undereconomic liberalism.[14]Berliner Morgenpostthat had been strongly associated with the political left in the past praised the regime's May Day celebrations.[14]
Volksgemeinschaft - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Here's Stalin's version....
And, Stalin helped Mussolini set up his May Day celebration...
'The youngest prime minister in Italian history,....Mussolini was showered with accolades from sundry quarters.... Stalin supplied Mussolini with the plans of the May Day parades in Red Square,to help him polish up his Fascist pageants....He conquered Ethiopia, madea Pact of Steel with Germany, introduced anti-Jewish measures in 1938,came into the war as Hitler's very junior partner,..." The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele
Socialist, fascists, Nazis, communists......Leftist all.
As are Progressives and Modern Liberals.
Be happy to provide a reading list for you, to bring you up to date.
Just say the word.
1. Being against slavery and being a white nationalist are not mutually exclusive. You would be hard pressed to find a single white nationalist of any time period who supported slavery.
2. Yes, because Hitler was such a friend of Soviet communism that he stabbed them in the back and made numerous speeches about how terrible communism was. National socialism is about rejecting and fighting all forms of globalism while communism basically is globalism.
15. Socialism, Communism, Nazism, Fascism, Liberalism and Progressivism: distinctions without differences. “…occupy the same ground and are only separated by a trivial technicality: the existence or absence of a sham market.”
“Moreover, as Ludwig von Mises demonstrated,2 the allegedly "right-wing" social order of Nazi Germany was just as socialistic as was Lenin's Russia. Through economic interventions the German government completely took over the economy. The only "market" left was a sham. Private individuals owned the means of production in name only. Real ownership of the means of production was in the hands of the state. This is what Mises called "socialism of the German or Hindenburg pattern." This variety of socialism is also known as Zwangswirtschaft, which is basically German for "compulsory economy." Those who were once entrepreneurs devolve in a Zwangswirtschaft into mere shop managers (Betriebsfuhrer in Nazi legalese), following the orders of a central command.
The only way in which "socialism of the Russian or Lenin pattern" (as Mises termed the more familiar variant of socialism) is distinct from the Zwangswirtschaft is in the nonessential fact that it has no such veneer of faux-private ownership. Its socialism is simply more overt.
Another way of stating this is as follows. In the populist propaganda of Bolshevism, under "socialism of the Russian or Lenin pattern" the people ostensibly own the state, and the state in turn owns the means of production. While, under the sham capitalism of Nazism and "socialism of the German or Hindenburg pattern," the people ostensibly own the means of production, but the state in turn owns the people.” False Choices and the True Dilemma | Dan Sanchez
Socialism, Communism, Nazism, Fascism, Liberalism and Progressivism
Which allow for free markets and individualism?
Oh….none of ‘em.
If you vote Democrat, get used to saying ‘totalitarianism.’
15. Socialism, Communism, Nazism, Fascism, Liberalism and Progressivism: distinctions without differences. “…occupy the same ground and are only separated by a trivial technicality: the existence or absence of a sham market.”
“Moreover, as Ludwig von Mises demonstrated,2 the allegedly "right-wing" social order of Nazi Germany was just as socialistic as was Lenin's Russia. Through economic interventions the German government completely took over the economy. The only "market" left was a sham. Private individuals owned the means of production in name only. Real ownership of the means of production was in the hands of the state. This is what Mises called "socialism of the German or Hindenburg pattern." This variety of socialism is also known as Zwangswirtschaft, which is basically German for "compulsory economy." Those who were once entrepreneurs devolve in a Zwangswirtschaft into mere shop managers (Betriebsfuhrer in Nazi legalese), following the orders of a central command.
The only way in which "socialism of the Russian or Lenin pattern" (as Mises termed the more familiar variant of socialism) is distinct from the Zwangswirtschaft is in the nonessential fact that it has no such veneer of faux-private ownership. Its socialism is simply more overt.
Another way of stating this is as follows. In the populist propaganda of Bolshevism, under "socialism of the Russian or Lenin pattern" the people ostensibly own the state, and the state in turn owns the means of production. While, under the sham capitalism of Nazism and "socialism of the German or Hindenburg pattern," the people ostensibly own the means of production, but the state in turn owns the people.” False Choices and the True Dilemma | Dan Sanchez
Socialism, Communism, Nazism, Fascism, Liberalism and Progressivism
Which allow for free markets and individualism?
Oh….none of ‘em.
If you vote Democrat, get used to saying ‘totalitarianism.’
They Want totalitarianism. Like many have pointed out, democrats do not want freedom or responsibility. That is too hard. They crave dependence and helplessness. You could force them to eat crap at gunpoint and they would be grateful because they wouldn't have to think or act on their own.
The Founding Fathers were individualists.This is why the traditional right lost.There are six forms of governance that require the bending of the knee and the neck to government.
These six are actually only a single way of governing, the collectivist way: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism and Progressivism, believing that government knows best. All six forms of socialism are simple variations on a theme: the individual must be subverted to the collective.
The alternative is capitalism, and free markets, based on individualism. “… the perennial question of European civilization: the individual versus the state. “Man is not ordained to the body politic, according to all that he is and has,” Thomas Aquinas wrote; “and so it does not follow that every action of his acquires merit or demerit in relation to the body politic.” NYSun
There are only two choices:
“There is simply no other choice than this: either to abstain from interference in the free play of the market, or to delegate the entire management of production and distribution to the government.
Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way.”
Books / Digital Text
1.Government schooling functions via ‘Mushroom Management,” keep ‘em in the dark and feed ‘em manure. The result is that a large number of their graduates imagine that there is a difference between Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism and Progressivism. Polls show many such government school grads actually favor socialism over capitalism.
…..all six of ‘em fit these criterion: the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Liberals, in my experience, are fearful folks who need the bodyguard of big government because they are vulnerable, battered emotional hypochondriacs....they need to insure themselves against every societal misadventure that could occur. They call that 'empathy,' but it's actually neurosis. They have some sort of metaphorical bullet lodged near their heart, just waiting for a slight move which will end it all! Thus, the overwhelming feeling of incipient failure, and apprehension. And, recognizing their own weakness, they lash out at those willing to depend on themselves.
They need the god called government and they worship same.
Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.
Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.
People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.
Wow. You just called non-whites stupid and weak.America was founded as an explicitly WHITE nation of individuals. Individualism only has any chance of working in a 90%+ white nation.No I didn’t.This is why the traditional right lost.There are six forms of governance that require the bending of the knee and the neck to government.
These six are actually only a single way of governing, the collectivist way: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism and Progressivism, believing that government knows best. All six forms of socialism are simple variations on a theme: the individual must be subverted to the collective.
The alternative is capitalism, and free markets, based on individualism. “… the perennial question of European civilization: the individual versus the state. “Man is not ordained to the body politic, according to all that he is and has,” Thomas Aquinas wrote; “and so it does not follow that every action of his acquires merit or demerit in relation to the body politic.” NYSun
There are only two choices:
“There is simply no other choice than this: either to abstain from interference in the free play of the market, or to delegate the entire management of production and distribution to the government.
Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way.”
Books / Digital Text
1.Government schooling functions via ‘Mushroom Management,” keep ‘em in the dark and feed ‘em manure. The result is that a large number of their graduates imagine that there is a difference between Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism and Progressivism. Polls show many such government school grads actually favor socialism over capitalism.
…..all six of ‘em fit these criterion: the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Liberals, in my experience, are fearful folks who need the bodyguard of big government because they are vulnerable, battered emotional hypochondriacs....they need to insure themselves against every societal misadventure that could occur. They call that 'empathy,' but it's actually neurosis. They have some sort of metaphorical bullet lodged near their heart, just waiting for a slight move which will end it all! Thus, the overwhelming feeling of incipient failure, and apprehension. And, recognizing their own weakness, they lash out at those willing to depend on themselves.
They need the god called government and they worship same.
Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.
Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.
People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.
You couldn't be more wrong.
You could attempt to be, but you wouldn't be successful.
You've just endorsed slavery.
Individualists endorse slavery.
You want individuals to compete against groups, lose to those groups and then refuse to form their own groups when their well-being depends on it.
THAT is slavery.
"Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature."
Mull this over: if you were anywhere near correct, why was it necessary for the socialists/communists/fascists/Progressives to slaughter over 100 million men, women, and children in the last century to advance their views.
Clearly it is far, far, from 'human nature.'
In fact, the Left denies that there is a 'human nature.'
America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. None of these are possible under Fascism, Socialism, or the New Deal. All six statist programs are based on an impossibility…. changing human nature.
But, they pretend they can do it. Mussolini wrote in his 1928 autobiography:
“The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. “(p. 280)
The Communist Revolution is based on the idea of transforming human nature. “The New Soviet man or New Soviet person as postulated by the ideologists of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was an archetype of a person with certain qualities that were said to be emerging as dominant among all citizens of the Soviet Union, irrespective of the country's long-standing cultural, ethnic, and linguistic diversity, creating a single Soviet people, Soviet nation.[1]
New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Leon Trotsky wrote in his Literature and Revolution [2] :
"The human species, the sluggish Homo sapiens, will once again enter the stage of radical reconstruction and become in his own hands the object of the most complex methods of artificial selection and psychophysical training... Man will make it his goal...to create a higher sociobiological type, a superman, if you will" New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Progressives have a similar view: human nature is plastic; politics is a means of perfecting man!
In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html_____
That’s why they claim a man can become a woman and vice versa by simply wishing it.
Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Fascism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, LF
And btw, fascism was created to fight COMMUNISM. The people created their own collective to fight another collective because that is the only way to beat a collective.
So slavery wasn't a form of collectivism?The Founding Fathers were individualists.This is why the traditional right lost.There are six forms of governance that require the bending of the knee and the neck to government.
These six are actually only a single way of governing, the collectivist way: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism and Progressivism, believing that government knows best. All six forms of socialism are simple variations on a theme: the individual must be subverted to the collective.
The alternative is capitalism, and free markets, based on individualism. “… the perennial question of European civilization: the individual versus the state. “Man is not ordained to the body politic, according to all that he is and has,” Thomas Aquinas wrote; “and so it does not follow that every action of his acquires merit or demerit in relation to the body politic.” NYSun
There are only two choices:
“There is simply no other choice than this: either to abstain from interference in the free play of the market, or to delegate the entire management of production and distribution to the government.
Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way.”
Books / Digital Text
1.Government schooling functions via ‘Mushroom Management,” keep ‘em in the dark and feed ‘em manure. The result is that a large number of their graduates imagine that there is a difference between Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism and Progressivism. Polls show many such government school grads actually favor socialism over capitalism.
…..all six of ‘em fit these criterion: the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Liberals, in my experience, are fearful folks who need the bodyguard of big government because they are vulnerable, battered emotional hypochondriacs....they need to insure themselves against every societal misadventure that could occur. They call that 'empathy,' but it's actually neurosis. They have some sort of metaphorical bullet lodged near their heart, just waiting for a slight move which will end it all! Thus, the overwhelming feeling of incipient failure, and apprehension. And, recognizing their own weakness, they lash out at those willing to depend on themselves.
They need the god called government and they worship same.
Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.
Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.
People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.
Look, being an adult is scary. Some people just can't handle being responsible for their own lives. Their weakness is propped up by shuffling off their responsibilities onto other people.
Collectivists are weak.
They consider themselves victims, but they vote for the very people who keep them victims.....The Founding Fathers were individualists.This is why the traditional right lost.There are six forms of governance that require the bending of the knee and the neck to government.
These six are actually only a single way of governing, the collectivist way: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism and Progressivism, believing that government knows best. All six forms of socialism are simple variations on a theme: the individual must be subverted to the collective.
The alternative is capitalism, and free markets, based on individualism. “… the perennial question of European civilization: the individual versus the state. “Man is not ordained to the body politic, according to all that he is and has,” Thomas Aquinas wrote; “and so it does not follow that every action of his acquires merit or demerit in relation to the body politic.” NYSun
There are only two choices:
“There is simply no other choice than this: either to abstain from interference in the free play of the market, or to delegate the entire management of production and distribution to the government.
Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way.”
Books / Digital Text
1.Government schooling functions via ‘Mushroom Management,” keep ‘em in the dark and feed ‘em manure. The result is that a large number of their graduates imagine that there is a difference between Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism and Progressivism. Polls show many such government school grads actually favor socialism over capitalism.
…..all six of ‘em fit these criterion: the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Liberals, in my experience, are fearful folks who need the bodyguard of big government because they are vulnerable, battered emotional hypochondriacs....they need to insure themselves against every societal misadventure that could occur. They call that 'empathy,' but it's actually neurosis. They have some sort of metaphorical bullet lodged near their heart, just waiting for a slight move which will end it all! Thus, the overwhelming feeling of incipient failure, and apprehension. And, recognizing their own weakness, they lash out at those willing to depend on themselves.
They need the god called government and they worship same.
Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.
Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.
People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.
Look, being an adult is scary. Some people just can't handle being responsible for their own lives. Their weakness is propped up by shuffling off their responsibilities onto other people.
Collectivists are weak.
Obviously it was (and still is in the Muslim world). Slaves aren't seen as individuals, no more than farm animals are. They're a commodity.So slavery wasn't a form of collectivism?The Founding Fathers were individualists.This is why the traditional right lost.There are six forms of governance that require the bending of the knee and the neck to government.
These six are actually only a single way of governing, the collectivist way: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism and Progressivism, believing that government knows best. All six forms of socialism are simple variations on a theme: the individual must be subverted to the collective.
The alternative is capitalism, and free markets, based on individualism. “… the perennial question of European civilization: the individual versus the state. “Man is not ordained to the body politic, according to all that he is and has,” Thomas Aquinas wrote; “and so it does not follow that every action of his acquires merit or demerit in relation to the body politic.” NYSun
There are only two choices:
“There is simply no other choice than this: either to abstain from interference in the free play of the market, or to delegate the entire management of production and distribution to the government.
Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way.”
Books / Digital Text
1.Government schooling functions via ‘Mushroom Management,” keep ‘em in the dark and feed ‘em manure. The result is that a large number of their graduates imagine that there is a difference between Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism and Progressivism. Polls show many such government school grads actually favor socialism over capitalism.
…..all six of ‘em fit these criterion: the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Liberals, in my experience, are fearful folks who need the bodyguard of big government because they are vulnerable, battered emotional hypochondriacs....they need to insure themselves against every societal misadventure that could occur. They call that 'empathy,' but it's actually neurosis. They have some sort of metaphorical bullet lodged near their heart, just waiting for a slight move which will end it all! Thus, the overwhelming feeling of incipient failure, and apprehension. And, recognizing their own weakness, they lash out at those willing to depend on themselves.
They need the god called government and they worship same.
Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.
Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.
People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.
Look, being an adult is scary. Some people just can't handle being responsible for their own lives. Their weakness is propped up by shuffling off their responsibilities onto other people.
Collectivists are weak.
It's hard to claim individualistic endeavours when you've got slaves working on da farm like the collectivist Founding Fathers did..Obviously it was (and still is in the Muslim world). Slaves aren't seen as individuals, no more than farm animals are. They're a commodity.So slavery wasn't a form of collectivism?The Founding Fathers were individualists.This is why the traditional right lost.There are six forms of governance that require the bending of the knee and the neck to government.
These six are actually only a single way of governing, the collectivist way: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism and Progressivism, believing that government knows best. All six forms of socialism are simple variations on a theme: the individual must be subverted to the collective.
The alternative is capitalism, and free markets, based on individualism. “… the perennial question of European civilization: the individual versus the state. “Man is not ordained to the body politic, according to all that he is and has,” Thomas Aquinas wrote; “and so it does not follow that every action of his acquires merit or demerit in relation to the body politic.” NYSun
There are only two choices:
“There is simply no other choice than this: either to abstain from interference in the free play of the market, or to delegate the entire management of production and distribution to the government.
Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way.”
Books / Digital Text
1.Government schooling functions via ‘Mushroom Management,” keep ‘em in the dark and feed ‘em manure. The result is that a large number of their graduates imagine that there is a difference between Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism and Progressivism. Polls show many such government school grads actually favor socialism over capitalism.
…..all six of ‘em fit these criterion: the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Liberals, in my experience, are fearful folks who need the bodyguard of big government because they are vulnerable, battered emotional hypochondriacs....they need to insure themselves against every societal misadventure that could occur. They call that 'empathy,' but it's actually neurosis. They have some sort of metaphorical bullet lodged near their heart, just waiting for a slight move which will end it all! Thus, the overwhelming feeling of incipient failure, and apprehension. And, recognizing their own weakness, they lash out at those willing to depend on themselves.
They need the god called government and they worship same.
Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.
Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.
People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.
Look, being an adult is scary. Some people just can't handle being responsible for their own lives. Their weakness is propped up by shuffling off their responsibilities onto other people.
Collectivists are weak.
Did you have a point?
Hardly, white liberals are cucks who worship non-whites more than they worship their ideology.Wow. You just called non-whites stupid and weak.America was founded as an explicitly WHITE nation of individuals. Individualism only has any chance of working in a 90%+ white nation.No I didn’t.This is why the traditional right lost.
Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.
Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.
People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.
You couldn't be more wrong.
You could attempt to be, but you wouldn't be successful.
You've just endorsed slavery.
Individualists endorse slavery.
You want individuals to compete against groups, lose to those groups and then refuse to form their own groups when their well-being depends on it.
THAT is slavery.
"Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature."
Mull this over: if you were anywhere near correct, why was it necessary for the socialists/communists/fascists/Progressives to slaughter over 100 million men, women, and children in the last century to advance their views.
Clearly it is far, far, from 'human nature.'
In fact, the Left denies that there is a 'human nature.'
America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. None of these are possible under Fascism, Socialism, or the New Deal. All six statist programs are based on an impossibility…. changing human nature.
But, they pretend they can do it. Mussolini wrote in his 1928 autobiography:
“The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. “(p. 280)
The Communist Revolution is based on the idea of transforming human nature. “The New Soviet man or New Soviet person as postulated by the ideologists of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was an archetype of a person with certain qualities that were said to be emerging as dominant among all citizens of the Soviet Union, irrespective of the country's long-standing cultural, ethnic, and linguistic diversity, creating a single Soviet people, Soviet nation.[1]
New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Leon Trotsky wrote in his Literature and Revolution [2] :
"The human species, the sluggish Homo sapiens, will once again enter the stage of radical reconstruction and become in his own hands the object of the most complex methods of artificial selection and psychophysical training... Man will make it his goal...to create a higher sociobiological type, a superman, if you will" New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Progressives have a similar view: human nature is plastic; politics is a means of perfecting man!
In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html_____
That’s why they claim a man can become a woman and vice versa by simply wishing it.
Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Fascism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, LF
And btw, fascism was created to fight COMMUNISM. The people created their own collective to fight another collective because that is the only way to beat a collective.
Let me guess...you're a white liberal.
*shrug* Prove they weren't individualists.It's hard to claim individualistic endeavours when you've got slaves working on da farm like the collectivist Founding Fathers did..Obviously it was (and still is in the Muslim world). Slaves aren't seen as individuals, no more than farm animals are. They're a commodity.So slavery wasn't a form of collectivism?The Founding Fathers were individualists.This is why the traditional right lost.There are six forms of governance that require the bending of the knee and the neck to government.
These six are actually only a single way of governing, the collectivist way: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism and Progressivism, believing that government knows best. All six forms of socialism are simple variations on a theme: the individual must be subverted to the collective.
The alternative is capitalism, and free markets, based on individualism. “… the perennial question of European civilization: the individual versus the state. “Man is not ordained to the body politic, according to all that he is and has,” Thomas Aquinas wrote; “and so it does not follow that every action of his acquires merit or demerit in relation to the body politic.” NYSun
There are only two choices:
“There is simply no other choice than this: either to abstain from interference in the free play of the market, or to delegate the entire management of production and distribution to the government.
Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way.”
Books / Digital Text
1.Government schooling functions via ‘Mushroom Management,” keep ‘em in the dark and feed ‘em manure. The result is that a large number of their graduates imagine that there is a difference between Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism and Progressivism. Polls show many such government school grads actually favor socialism over capitalism.
…..all six of ‘em fit these criterion: the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Liberals, in my experience, are fearful folks who need the bodyguard of big government because they are vulnerable, battered emotional hypochondriacs....they need to insure themselves against every societal misadventure that could occur. They call that 'empathy,' but it's actually neurosis. They have some sort of metaphorical bullet lodged near their heart, just waiting for a slight move which will end it all! Thus, the overwhelming feeling of incipient failure, and apprehension. And, recognizing their own weakness, they lash out at those willing to depend on themselves.
They need the god called government and they worship same.
Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.
Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.
People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.
Look, being an adult is scary. Some people just can't handle being responsible for their own lives. Their weakness is propped up by shuffling off their responsibilities onto other people.
Collectivists are weak.
Did you have a point?
Don't distort my words to validate your racism, Slappy.Hardly, white liberals are cucks who worship non-whites more than they worship their ideology.Wow. You just called non-whites stupid and weak.America was founded as an explicitly WHITE nation of individuals. Individualism only has any chance of working in a 90%+ white nation.No I didn’t.You couldn't be more wrong.
You could attempt to be, but you wouldn't be successful.
You've just endorsed slavery.
Individualists endorse slavery.
You want individuals to compete against groups, lose to those groups and then refuse to form their own groups when their well-being depends on it.
THAT is slavery.
"Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature."
Mull this over: if you were anywhere near correct, why was it necessary for the socialists/communists/fascists/Progressives to slaughter over 100 million men, women, and children in the last century to advance their views.
Clearly it is far, far, from 'human nature.'
In fact, the Left denies that there is a 'human nature.'
America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. None of these are possible under Fascism, Socialism, or the New Deal. All six statist programs are based on an impossibility…. changing human nature.
But, they pretend they can do it. Mussolini wrote in his 1928 autobiography:
“The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. “(p. 280)
The Communist Revolution is based on the idea of transforming human nature. “The New Soviet man or New Soviet person as postulated by the ideologists of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was an archetype of a person with certain qualities that were said to be emerging as dominant among all citizens of the Soviet Union, irrespective of the country's long-standing cultural, ethnic, and linguistic diversity, creating a single Soviet people, Soviet nation.[1]
New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Leon Trotsky wrote in his Literature and Revolution [2] :
"The human species, the sluggish Homo sapiens, will once again enter the stage of radical reconstruction and become in his own hands the object of the most complex methods of artificial selection and psychophysical training... Man will make it his goal...to create a higher sociobiological type, a superman, if you will" New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Progressives have a similar view: human nature is plastic; politics is a means of perfecting man!
In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html_____
That’s why they claim a man can become a woman and vice versa by simply wishing it.
Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Fascism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, LF
And btw, fascism was created to fight COMMUNISM. The people created their own collective to fight another collective because that is the only way to beat a collective.
Let me guess...you're a white liberal.
Non-whites are almost entirely collectivist by the way. So according to you that makes them stupid and weak.
The Founding Fathers were unapologetic white nationalists in every sense of the word. Not only were they like the Europeans and looking out for only their people, but they considered anyone from Europe who came to America as one of their people.The Founding Fathers were individualists.This is why the traditional right lost.There are six forms of governance that require the bending of the knee and the neck to government.
These six are actually only a single way of governing, the collectivist way: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism and Progressivism, believing that government knows best. All six forms of socialism are simple variations on a theme: the individual must be subverted to the collective.
The alternative is capitalism, and free markets, based on individualism. “… the perennial question of European civilization: the individual versus the state. “Man is not ordained to the body politic, according to all that he is and has,” Thomas Aquinas wrote; “and so it does not follow that every action of his acquires merit or demerit in relation to the body politic.” NYSun
There are only two choices:
“There is simply no other choice than this: either to abstain from interference in the free play of the market, or to delegate the entire management of production and distribution to the government.
Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way.”
Books / Digital Text
1.Government schooling functions via ‘Mushroom Management,” keep ‘em in the dark and feed ‘em manure. The result is that a large number of their graduates imagine that there is a difference between Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism and Progressivism. Polls show many such government school grads actually favor socialism over capitalism.
…..all six of ‘em fit these criterion: the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!
Liberals, in my experience, are fearful folks who need the bodyguard of big government because they are vulnerable, battered emotional hypochondriacs....they need to insure themselves against every societal misadventure that could occur. They call that 'empathy,' but it's actually neurosis. They have some sort of metaphorical bullet lodged near their heart, just waiting for a slight move which will end it all! Thus, the overwhelming feeling of incipient failure, and apprehension. And, recognizing their own weakness, they lash out at those willing to depend on themselves.
They need the god called government and they worship same.
Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.
Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.
People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.
Look, being an adult is scary. Some people just can't handle being responsible for their own lives. Their weakness is propped up by shuffling off their responsibilities onto other people.
Collectivists are weak.
Don’t claim to be a conservative when you are just a left wing cuck who worships non-whites slappy.Don't distort my words to validate your racism, Slappy.Hardly, white liberals are cucks who worship non-whites more than they worship their ideology.Wow. You just called non-whites stupid and weak.America was founded as an explicitly WHITE nation of individuals. Individualism only has any chance of working in a 90%+ white nation.No I didn’t.
Individualists endorse slavery.
You want individuals to compete against groups, lose to those groups and then refuse to form their own groups when their well-being depends on it.
THAT is slavery.
"Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature."
Mull this over: if you were anywhere near correct, why was it necessary for the socialists/communists/fascists/Progressives to slaughter over 100 million men, women, and children in the last century to advance their views.
Clearly it is far, far, from 'human nature.'
In fact, the Left denies that there is a 'human nature.'
America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. None of these are possible under Fascism, Socialism, or the New Deal. All six statist programs are based on an impossibility…. changing human nature.
But, they pretend they can do it. Mussolini wrote in his 1928 autobiography:
“The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. “(p. 280)
The Communist Revolution is based on the idea of transforming human nature. “The New Soviet man or New Soviet person as postulated by the ideologists of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was an archetype of a person with certain qualities that were said to be emerging as dominant among all citizens of the Soviet Union, irrespective of the country's long-standing cultural, ethnic, and linguistic diversity, creating a single Soviet people, Soviet nation.[1]
New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Leon Trotsky wrote in his Literature and Revolution [2] :
"The human species, the sluggish Homo sapiens, will once again enter the stage of radical reconstruction and become in his own hands the object of the most complex methods of artificial selection and psychophysical training... Man will make it his goal...to create a higher sociobiological type, a superman, if you will" New Soviet man - Wikipedia
Progressives have a similar view: human nature is plastic; politics is a means of perfecting man!
In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html_____
That’s why they claim a man can become a woman and vice versa by simply wishing it.
Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Fascism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, LF
And btw, fascism was created to fight COMMUNISM. The people created their own collective to fight another collective because that is the only way to beat a collective.
Let me guess...you're a white liberal.
Non-whites are almost entirely collectivist by the way. So according to you that makes them stupid and weak.
Squirm a little harder to prove what type of rugged individualist has slaves do all the conquering of the hard jobs.*shrug* Prove they weren't individualists.It's hard to claim individualistic endeavours when you've got slaves working on da farm like the collectivist Founding Fathers did..Obviously it was (and still is in the Muslim world). Slaves aren't seen as individuals, no more than farm animals are. They're a commodity.So slavery wasn't a form of collectivism?The Founding Fathers were individualists.This is why the traditional right lost.
Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.
Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.
People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.
Look, being an adult is scary. Some people just can't handle being responsible for their own lives. Their weakness is propped up by shuffling off their responsibilities onto other people.
Collectivists are weak.
Did you have a point?
OH WAIT -- the Constitution proves they were.
Dismissed.
Squirm a little harder to prove what type of rugged individualist has slaves do all the conquering of the hard jobs.*shrug* Prove they weren't individualists.It's hard to claim individualistic endeavours when you've got slaves working on da farm like the collectivist Founding Fathers did..Obviously it was (and still is in the Muslim world). Slaves aren't seen as individuals, no more than farm animals are. They're a commodity.So slavery wasn't a form of collectivism?The Founding Fathers were individualists.
Look, being an adult is scary. Some people just can't handle being responsible for their own lives. Their weakness is propped up by shuffling off their responsibilities onto other people.
Collectivists are weak.
Did you have a point?
OH WAIT -- the Constitution proves they were.
Dismissed.
