Worship Of Government: Distinctions Without A Difference

[PoliticalChic]

There are six forms of governance that require the bending of the knee and the neck to government.

These six are actually only a single way of governing, the collectivist way: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism and Progressivism, believing that government knows best. All six forms of socialism are simple variations on a theme: the individual must be subverted to the collective.



The alternative is capitalism, and free markets, based on individualism. “… the perennial question of European civilization: the individual versus the state. “Man is not ordained to the body politic, according to all that he is and has,” Thomas Aquinas wrote; “and so it does not follow that every action of his acquires merit or demerit in relation to the body politic.” NYSun


There are only two choices:

“There is simply no other choice than this: either to abstain from interference in the free play of the market, or to delegate the entire management of production and distribution to the government.
Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way.”
Books / Digital Text





1.Government schooling functions via ‘Mushroom Management,” keep ‘em in the dark and feed ‘em manure. The result is that a large number of their graduates imagine that there is a difference between Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism and Progressivism. Polls show many such government school grads actually favor socialism over capitalism.

…..all six of ‘em fit these criterion: the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.

In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!



Liberals, in my experience, are fearful folks who need the bodyguard of big government because they are vulnerable, battered emotional hypochondriacs....they need to insure themselves against every societal misadventure that could occur. They call that 'empathy,' but it's actually neurosis. They have some sort of metaphorical bullet lodged near their heart, just waiting for a slight move which will end it all! Thus, the overwhelming feeling of incipient failure, and apprehension. And, recognizing their own weakness, they lash out at those willing to depend on themselves.

They need the god called government and they worship same.

This is why the traditional right lost.

Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.

Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.

People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.

The Founding Fathers were individualists.

Look, being an adult is scary. Some people just can't handle being responsible for their own lives. Their weakness is propped up by shuffling off their responsibilities onto other people.

Collectivists are weak.

The Founding Fathers were unapologetic white nationalists in every sense of the word. Not only were they like the Europeans and looking out for only their people, but they considered anyone from Europe who came to America as one of their people.

Pan-European/white nationalists.

Easily proven wrong.

The Founders instituted a system designed to end slavery.

The decision that they made was supported years later by the greatest President in the last 100 years: he told aides on many occasions, “I’d rather get 80 percent of what I want than go over the cliff with my flag flying.” Ronald Reagan

Just so, the Founders compromised with the slaver-owners of the South, in order to form the finest nation the world had ever seen, while planning on coming back later to finish off slavery altogether. That design can be seen in denying the South the ability to count slaves fully in the census, which would have given them perpetual control of Congress.

“In 1860…no Republican owned a slave. I don’t mean that no Republican leader owned a slave. No Republican in the country owned a slave. All the slaves in the country at the time-all four million of them- were owned by Democrats.”
“Death Of A Nation,” Dinesh D’Souza, p. 100

 

[PoliticalChic]

16. “There is simply no other choice than this: either to abstain from interference in the free play of the market, or to delegate the entire management of production and distribution to the government. Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way.”
Books / Digital Text




Government schooling functions via ‘Mushroom Management,” keep ‘em in the dark and feed ‘em manure. The result is that a large number of their graduates imagine that there is a difference between Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism and Progressivism. Polls show many such government school grads actually favor socialism over capitalism.
… every economic policy decision is a two-pronged fork in the road; there is no third prong. And neither are the two prongs toward the "Left" and the "Right."




17. There is capitalism, and there is socialism.


“Any sane person who learns what is truly entailed in "that which is called capitalism" and what is truly entailed in "that which is called socialism" will choose the former over the latter.

That is because socialism (which, again, is the only direction one can choose besides capitalism) is social suicide. As Mises irrefutably proved as early as 1920,11 the socialist state has no way of rationally directing production. Socialism means discoordination, capital consumption, famine, and death. Thus between capitalism and socialism (which, once more, are the only two choices), the informed chooser could not have an easier choice to make. ….Nazis, Fascists, and other national imperialists, or the doctrine of class warfare promoted by the internationalist Marxists. As Mises brilliantly characterized it, the only important difference between the two doctrines was that one divided society into irreconcilable camps vertically (along national lines) and the other did the same horizontally (along class lines).” https://mises.org/library/false-choices-and-true-dilemma




Let's see how you vote.....

 

[PoliticalChic]

"If one needed evidence of the gross ignorance of millennials, and their teachers and college professors, it's their solid support for socialism and socialist presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders. Socialism has produced tragedy wherever it has been implemented. Last year marked the 40th anniversary of nearly 1,000 Americans perishing in a mass suicide/murder in the jungles of Guyana. Just as Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez see socialism as mankind's salvation, so, too, did Rev. Jim Jones, who told his followers, "God is Socialism, and I am Principle Socialism, and that's what makes me God."

Perhaps the most disastrous failing of our educational system and the news media is that people are neither required nor encouraged to test ideas against facts. The promises of socialism sound wonderful and caring, but in reality, wherever it has been tried it has been a true disaster."
Millennials for Socialism

 

[daveman]

There are six forms of governance that require the bending of the knee and the neck to government.

These six are actually only a single way of governing, the collectivist way: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism and Progressivism, believing that government knows best. All six forms of socialism are simple variations on a theme: the individual must be subverted to the collective.



The alternative is capitalism, and free markets, based on individualism. “… the perennial question of European civilization: the individual versus the state. “Man is not ordained to the body politic, according to all that he is and has,” Thomas Aquinas wrote; “and so it does not follow that every action of his acquires merit or demerit in relation to the body politic.” NYSun


There are only two choices:

“There is simply no other choice than this: either to abstain from interference in the free play of the market, or to delegate the entire management of production and distribution to the government.
Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way.”
Books / Digital Text





1.Government schooling functions via ‘Mushroom Management,” keep ‘em in the dark and feed ‘em manure. The result is that a large number of their graduates imagine that there is a difference between Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism and Progressivism. Polls show many such government school grads actually favor socialism over capitalism.

…..all six of ‘em fit these criterion: the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.

In the free market, every man, woman and child is scheming to find a better way to make a product or service that will make a fortune!



Liberals, in my experience, are fearful folks who need the bodyguard of big government because they are vulnerable, battered emotional hypochondriacs....they need to insure themselves against every societal misadventure that could occur. They call that 'empathy,' but it's actually neurosis. They have some sort of metaphorical bullet lodged near their heart, just waiting for a slight move which will end it all! Thus, the overwhelming feeling of incipient failure, and apprehension. And, recognizing their own weakness, they lash out at those willing to depend on themselves.

They need the god called government and they worship same.

This is why the traditional right lost.

Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature.

Your FAMILY is a collective. Your CHURCH is a collective.

People get crushed very easily as individuals no matter how strong they are. Individualism is stupid.

The Founding Fathers were individualists.

Look, being an adult is scary. Some people just can't handle being responsible for their own lives. Their weakness is propped up by shuffling off their responsibilities onto other people.

Collectivists are weak.

The Founding Fathers were unapologetic white nationalists in every sense of the word. Not only were they like the Europeans and looking out for only their people, but they considered anyone from Europe who came to America as one of their people.

Pan-European/white nationalists.

If that makes you feel better about being a piece of shit, sure.

 

[daveman]

"Collectivism is NOT a bad thing. It is human nature."

Mull this over: if you were anywhere near correct, why was it necessary for the socialists/communists/fascists/Progressives to slaughter over 100 million men, women, and children in the last century to advance their views.




Clearly it is far, far, from 'human nature.'



In fact, the Left denies that there is a 'human nature.'
America was founded based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. None of these are possible under Fascism, Socialism, or the New Deal. All six statist programs are based on an impossibility…. changing human nature.

But, they pretend they can do it. Mussolini wrote in his 1928 autobiography:

“The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. “(p. 280)




The Communist Revolution is based on the idea of transforming human nature. “The New Soviet man or New Soviet person as postulated by the ideologists of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was an archetype of a person with certain qualities that were said to be emerging as dominant among all citizens of the Soviet Union, irrespective of the country's long-standing cultural, ethnic, and linguistic diversity, creating a single Soviet people, Soviet nation.[1]
New Soviet man - Wikipedia


Leon Trotsky wrote in his Literature and Revolution [2] :

"The human species, the sluggish Homo sapiens, will once again enter the stage of radical reconstruction and become in his own hands the object of the most complex methods of artificial selection and psychophysical training... Man will make it his goal...to create a higher sociobiological type, a superman, if you will" New Soviet man - Wikipedia



Progressives have a similar view: human nature is plastic; politics is a means of perfecting man!

In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html_____


That’s why they claim a man can become a woman and vice versa by simply wishing it.



Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Fascism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...." Goldberg, LF

America was founded as an explicitly WHITE nation of individuals. Individualism only has any chance of working in a 90%+ white nation.

And btw, fascism was created to fight COMMUNISM. The people created their own collective to fight another collective because that is the only way to beat a collective.

Wow. You just called non-whites stupid and weak.

Let me guess...you're a white liberal.

Hardly, white liberals are cucks who worship non-whites more than they worship their ideology.

Non-whites are almost entirely collectivist by the way. So according to you that makes them stupid and weak.

Don't distort my words to validate your racism, Slappy.

Don’t claim to be a conservative when you are just a left wing cuck who worships non-whites slappy.

Have you had a CAT scan recently? Because there's something wrong inside your head.

 

[daveman]

The Founding Fathers were individualists.

Look, being an adult is scary. Some people just can't handle being responsible for their own lives. Their weakness is propped up by shuffling off their responsibilities onto other people.

Collectivists are weak.

So slavery wasn't a form of collectivism?

Obviously it was (and still is in the Muslim world). Slaves aren't seen as individuals, no more than farm animals are. They're a commodity.

Did you have a point?

It's hard to claim individualistic endeavours when you've got slaves working on da farm like the collectivist Founding Fathers did..

*shrug* Prove they weren't individualists.

OH WAIT -- the Constitution proves they were.

Dismissed.

Squirm a little harder to prove what type of rugged individualist has slaves do all the conquering of the hard jobs.

Look, I get it...and I've gone over this. Being a responsible adult scares you. You want other people to take care of you.

No. Grow up.