Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maliki could not order US troops out of Iraq? Are you serious? So I'm imagining this from Article 24 of the Status of Forces agreement?
4.The United States recognizes the sovereign right of the Government of Iraq to request the departure of the United States Forces from Iraq at any time.
Did I make it big enough for you to read? I can go one more font size level lololol.
Yeah. Both you and Peach, apparently, made your naiveté clear enough.
See post #330 for a little reality check.
Your post is bullshit. Is that the reality I'm supposed to recognize?
Amazingly the RWnut argument is turning more and more towards where I said it was going months ago, i.e.,
that despite the American people not wanting us in Iraq, and the Iraqi people not wanting us in Iraq, and Maliki not wanting us in Iraq,
President Obama is somehow at fault for not keeping us in Iraq.
Oh, and btw, staying in Iraq, against all that public opinion, could not have even been an assurance that anything other than more Americans getting needlessly killed would have occurred.
Have RWers had a mental meltdown? That's probably a silly question, but the fact of the matter is this: The debacle that is Iraq is not and will not be historically placed at President Obama's feet. It will be the legacy of George Bush, Dick Cheney, and those nutty neocons who cooked up the idea to invade Iraq back when Clinton was still in office with their whole PNAC nonsense. To THIS day, I don't know why anyone would give ANY credence to anything William Kristol has to say because he's got a worse track record when it comes to predictions than Jeane Dixon had. Keep in mind that he was one of the earliest boosters for Sarah Palin.
You are absolutely correct. Bush will be blamed for invading and liberating Iraq from a tyrant. He will get the blame for establishing a functioning government there. Bush will be blamed for being successful in Iraq. In spite of the fact that I did not want or support the war.
On the other hand the failures on Iraq all belong to the current administration. No if and or buts about it. The decisions that led to this situation, were Obama's to make. At the very lease, he has demonstrated that he has little or no leaderships skills outside his base.
Bush won in Iraq. Obama lost.
The left is trying to rewrite history, but it's not gonna work.
WaPo: Wait, didn?t Obama take credit for full Iraq withdrawal in 2011? « Hot Air
And people like you wanted Bush to get the credit.
The left is trying to rewrite history, but it's not gonna work.
WaPo: Wait, didn?t Obama take credit for full Iraq withdrawal in 2011? « Hot Air
And people like you wanted Bush to get the credit.
Is the rightwing insanity coming through here? That somehow we'd be better off if a few thousand Americans were still in Iraq fighting and dying?
THAT is what they are blaming Obama for NOT making possible.
Have RWers had a mental meltdown? That's probably a silly question, but the fact of the matter is this: The debacle that is Iraq is not and will not be historically placed at President Obama's feet. It will be the legacy of George Bush, Dick Cheney, and those nutty neocons who cooked up the idea to invade Iraq back when Clinton was still in office with their whole PNAC nonsense. To THIS day, I don't know why anyone would give ANY credence to anything William Kristol has to say because he's got a worse track record when it comes to predictions than Jeane Dixon had. Keep in mind that he was one of the earliest boosters for Sarah Palin.
You are absolutely correct. Bush will be blamed for invading and liberating Iraq from a tyrant. He will get the blame for establishing a functioning government there. Bush will be blamed for being successful in Iraq. In spite of the fact that I did not want or support the war.
On the other hand the failures on Iraq all belong to the current administration. No if and or buts about it. The decisions that led to this situation, were Obama's to make. At the very lease, he has demonstrated that he has little or no leaderships skills outside his base.
Bush won in Iraq. Obama lost.
See what I mean. That is new Rightwing myth. In six words.
Maliki could not order US troops out of Iraq? Are you serious? So I'm imagining this from Article 24 of the Status of Forces agreement?
4.The United States recognizes the sovereign right of the Government of Iraq to request the departure of the United States Forces from Iraq at any time.
Did I make it big enough for you to read? I can go one more font size level lololol.
Yeah. Both you and Peach, apparently, made your naiveté clear enough.
See post #330 for a little reality check.
Your post is bullshit. Is that the reality I'm supposed to recognize?
Amazingly the RWnut argument is turning more and more towards where I said it was going months ago, i.e.,
that despite the American people not wanting us in Iraq, and the Iraqi people not wanting us in Iraq, and Maliki not wanting us in Iraq,
President Obama is somehow at fault for not keeping us in Iraq.
Oh, and btw, staying in Iraq, against all that public opinion, could not have even been an assurance that anything other than more Americans getting needlessly killed would have occurred.
Link? or it didn't happen...
Nobody buys those stupid liberal lines anymore. I just said it's not posted yet. But darlin' you can bet the world is on fire over his press conference. EspeciallyTwitter.
The left is trying to rewrite history, but it's not gonna work.
WaPo: Wait, didn?t Obama take credit for full Iraq withdrawal in 2011? « Hot Air
And people like you wanted Bush to get the credit.
Is the rightwing insanity coming through here? That somehow we'd be better off if a few thousand Americans were still in Iraq fighting and dying?
THAT is what they are blaming Obama for NOT making possible.
Yeah. Both you and Peach, apparently, made your naiveté clear enough.
See post #330 for a little reality check.
Your post is bullshit. Is that the reality I'm supposed to recognize?
Amazingly the RWnut argument is turning more and more towards where I said it was going months ago, i.e.,
that despite the American people not wanting us in Iraq, and the Iraqi people not wanting us in Iraq, and Maliki not wanting us in Iraq,
President Obama is somehow at fault for not keeping us in Iraq.
Oh, and btw, staying in Iraq, against all that public opinion, could not have even been an assurance that anything other than more Americans getting needlessly killed would have occurred.
Remembering recent events is naivete now; Bush fabricated data, proclaimed victory, and let thousands of US troops die(.) Our poorly planned war in Iraq also let al Qaeda remain, nothing can change the FACTS.
Link? or it didn't happen...
What did Bush win?? In iraq? No WMD's, defanged Shia run govt. and the loss of billions if not trillions in wasted tax dollars trying to train complete and utter cowards to protect their own nation, and this is a win!?
Link? or it didn't happen...
You wouldn't accept it if your were in the room while it happened.
What did Bush win?? In iraq? No WMD's, defanged Shia run govt. and the loss of billions if not trillions in wasted tax dollars trying to train complete and utter cowards to protect their own nation, and this is a win!?
And now Obama is headed back in, glad you retards voted for bush only to have a whole new set of retards vote for Obama.
Oh Wow ~ Obama now claims he had "Bad Intelligence estimates" for not anticipating the speed in which ISIS would capture large sections of Iraq.
How come I've been reading about ISIS for months just like everyone else except Obama. Sort of like Boooooooosh lying about WMDs in Iraq. Bad Intell.
Our POTUS is a liar ~~ And he has just shown to the world what a real liar he is.
Obama: Bad Intelligence Behind ISIS Underestimation
What did Bush win?? In iraq? No WMD's, defanged Shia run govt. and the loss of billions if not trillions in wasted tax dollars trying to train complete and utter cowards to protect their own nation, and this is a win!?
