eots
no fly list
- Thread starter
- #281
this is your defense of the NIST report ?I mean the vacant cavity of presumptive clueless asshelmets, speaking of fucktard.
"You mean the magic light weight explosives that were installed after the fires started? Speaking of fucktard. LOL!"
You mean the magic top secret super high intensity 'fire implosion devices'.
why dont you help him tell us what the option are to bring down a building like that genius. Every option. (another cold day in hell)
I think a long burning fire combined with damage from falling debris works just fine.
Better than Dick Cheney and the Rothschildes running thru the building slapping thousands of charges on support beams, just to destroy some paperwork.
Was that the motive you stupid shit?
It's funny how the inside job theorists call the official version impossible but they want to replace it with something even more impossible.
I still haven't heard one of these dipshits supply a motive.
"I still haven't heard one of these dipshits supply a motive."
hey dumbass thats because its not about a conspiracy theory!
Yes it is. If you don't accept the official version, then you have to explain what happened. If you do that, it's a conspiracy theory.
There is no theory..we have photographic evidence and eyewitness to molten metal and NIST claiming they knew of no evidence and no one who had seen it...those are simply facts you can not disputeYou twoofers never had a debate to begin with. Your goofy conspiracy theories are a laughable joke.So we have the strawman of aliens invoked by the one debwunker in response to wireless detonation technology..and an ad hominem
attack on Paul Craig Roberts instead of the information he provided...and lastly we have a "so what if it was"..it seems clear to me the debwunkers have lost the debate in epic fashion