WTC building 7

[daws101]

a plane was found at the pentagon! speaking of morons ,,

no plane was found what are you smokin? if you think there was lets see your 'plane'

Only one piece of aircraft debris larger than small shards was seen by passers-by outside of the building.

Should Large Aircraft Pieces Be Evident?
The absence of of large pieces of aircraft in photographs stikes many observers as incongruous with the crash of a large jetliner such as the 757 that Flight 77 was. Many people have seen photographs of jetliner crashes in which large sections of the planes remain intact. However, a high-speed crash into a hardened target such as a building is not comparable to typical crash incidents. Furthermore, even crashes into terrain, most of them at much slower speeds than the crashes on 9/11/01, often leave very little in the way of recognizable aircraft parts.








so ends you bullshit.

 

[KokomoJojo]

So dawes how is your dumb ass doing with outsmarting an electron microscope?

Making any progress on that?

 

[KokomoJojo]

a plane was found at the pentagon! speaking of morons ,,

no plane was found what are you smokin? if you think there was lets see your 'plane'

Only one piece of aircraft debris larger than small shards was seen by passers-by outside of the building.

Should Large Aircraft Pieces Be Evident?
The absence of of large pieces of aircraft in photographs stikes many observers as incongruous with the crash of a large jetliner such as the 757 that Flight 77 was. Many people have seen photographs of jetliner crashes in which large sections of the planes remain intact. However, a high-speed crash into a hardened target such as a building is not comparable to typical crash incidents. Furthermore, even crashes into terrain, most of them at much slower speeds than the crashes on 9/11/01, often leave very little in the way of recognizable aircraft parts.








so ends you bullshit.

so continues your bullshit

where the hell is the debris?

Besides this is supposed to be about wtc7

No plane hit wtc7

 

[daws101]

that's another thing if a building falls down none of it fall outward? especially since most of the fire would have been internal not toward the outer walls for cement and steel doesn't burn like furniture etc.. the building would have never fallen like that. how come nobody can find even one building in all this time that has ever fallen from fire and earthquakes even like this? because it doesn't happen perfectly like that. how stupid do you people have to be.

false ! that all depends on the design of the building...you're not very good at this are you?

wtc 7s design was not called into question by NIST no significant recommendations to building code resulted from the NIST report

if it were a design flaw insurance companies would have been all over it.

ignorant ass hat there was no design flaw or the building would never have gone up.
many building are not designed to collapse inward.
a building's design and construction are based on the zoning and safety laws in a giving state or county etc.

 

[daws101]

yeah and jet fuel melts steel and metaled steel breaks at the same time perfectly allowing structure to collapse vertically. lol

steel being critically weakened by jet fuel

all that test shows is that if you get steel hot enough it will collapse and it did NOT MELT any steel.

That and the jet fuel burned off in 10 seconds.

Once again for those posers who are really fucking slow and do not understand when they had their asses handed to them, this is what a column looks like that failed due to overheating.

NOW show us just ONE column from any wtc building that looks like that.



you people are nothing short of shitty comedy show.

the previous post is pure bullshit.

 

[daws101]

no its not------demo jobs show evidence of implosion

Hmm lets see if you got something there:

describe what evidence of implosion looks like.

something has to squish in-------it may not be apparent on a casual
glance while the event is ongoing---but should show up on exam of video and multi-views-----the squish-in is an EARLY part of the cave-in-----it initiates it.---
it is the big time energy event. -------the big time energy event in the
falling towers did not happen until they fell. They stood quietly burning
after the BAM AND FLASH of the plane-----so quietly that from my position
-------I was confident that everyone would get out------because very early on I
thought that the big time smoke was started by a piper cub that hit a wall----
nothing was shaken (that the first hit----and for the several minutes it took
to get to the second hit---_BIG TIME BANG AND FLASH/ Firm buildings
for more than half hour--------just spitting white smoke------sudden collapse then
BIG TIME ENERGY RELEASE at the base and the sky darkened

I didnt hear any physics or engineering in there anywhere, just a lot of parrot talk, want to try again?

even if you did you'd have no clue as to what it meant.

 

[irosie91]

the only so called evidence NIST has is the computer model but they will not release the data they used citing ..national security
http://cryptome.org/wtc-nist-wtc7-no.pdf

welcome to socialism and the land of the free.

FFS here you have engineers that the cause of failure by fire information is being with held so they have no idea how to design future buildings so they do not fail the same way because it may jeapardize public safety!

OMFG!

and these fucktard posers buy into that amoeba iq shit, unreal!

You're getting hysterical, sweety. But, I have to admit that it is comedy gold watching your hysteria infect the other, more excitable, conspiracy theorists.

cool as a cucumber in fall.

So you agree with NIST that engineers should be deprived of the information how fire caused the collapse of wtc 7, and therefore cannot insure it never happens again.

You agree with that right?

what "never happen again"-------that a building on fire collapse?-----never happen
again???-----that is what does seem to happen to them

 

[KokomoJojo]

if it were a design flaw insurance companies would have been all over it.

ignorant ass hat there was no design flaw or the building would never have gone up.
many building are not designed to collapse inward.
a building's design and construction are based on the zoning and safety laws in a giving state or county etc.

where did the building go up to the moon and aliens did it?

Thats why you have a problem. If there was no design flaw then wtc7 could not have collapsed.

 

[KokomoJojo]

the only so called evidence NIST has is the computer model but they will not release the data they used citing ..national security
http://cryptome.org/wtc-nist-wtc7-no.pdf

welcome to socialism and the land of the free.

FFS here you have engineers that the cause of failure by fire information is being with held so they have no idea how to design future buildings so they do not fail the same way because it may jeapardize public safety!

OMFG!

and these fucktard posers buy into that amoeba iq shit, unreal!

You're getting hysterical, sweety. But, I have to admit that it is comedy gold watching your hysteria infect the other, more excitable, conspiracy theorists.

cool as a cucumber in fall.

So you agree with NIST that engineers should be deprived of the information how fire caused the collapse of wtc 7, and therefore cannot insure it never happens again.

You agree with that right?

what "never happen again"-------that a building on fire collapse?-----never happen
again???-----that is what does seem to happen to them

so you think its common normal everyday stuff that steel framed buildings completely collapse in on themselves from fire.

 

[irosie91]

if it were a design flaw insurance companies would have been all over it.

ignorant ass hat there was no design flaw or the building would never have gone up.
many building are not designed to collapse inward.
a building's design and construction are based on the zoning and safety laws in a giving state or county etc.

where did the building go up to the moon and aliens did it?

Thats why you have a problem. If there was no design flaw then wtc7 could not have collapsed.

why not? bad things happen to buildings that are on fire----have had junk fall on
them and been subjected to a huge burst of energy right next door. You are damned optimistic -----you envision building IMMUNE from damage not matter
what the trauma

 

[daws101]

a plane was found at the pentagon! speaking of morons ,,

no plane was found what are you smokin? if you think there was lets see your 'plane'

If I recall correctly ----witnesses in the building saw a plane------right?

no one said there was not a plane..why do you keep repeating this

This silly question has been asked 8000 times. It did happen, there were reliable witnesses. It is best that you grow up.

 

[KokomoJojo]

no its not------demo jobs show evidence of implosion

Hmm lets see if you got something there:

describe what evidence of implosion looks like.

something has to squish in-------it may not be apparent on a casual
glance while the event is ongoing---but should show up on exam of video and multi-views-----the squish-in is an EARLY part of the cave-in-----it initiates it.---
it is the big time energy event. -------the big time energy event in the
falling towers did not happen until they fell. They stood quietly burning
after the BAM AND FLASH of the plane-----so quietly that from my position
-------I was confident that everyone would get out------because very early on I
thought that the big time smoke was started by a piper cub that hit a wall----
nothing was shaken (that the first hit----and for the several minutes it took
to get to the second hit---_BIG TIME BANG AND FLASH/ Firm buildings
for more than half hour--------just spitting white smoke------sudden collapse then
BIG TIME ENERGY RELEASE at the base and the sky darkened

I didnt hear any physics or engineering in there anywhere, just a lot of parrot talk, want to try again?

even if you did you'd have no clue as to what it meant.

doesnt change the fact that rosie cant describe what an implosion looks like.

 

[KokomoJojo]

if it were a design flaw insurance companies would have been all over it.

ignorant ass hat there was no design flaw or the building would never have gone up.
many building are not designed to collapse inward.
a building's design and construction are based on the zoning and safety laws in a giving state or county etc.

where did the building go up to the moon and aliens did it?

Thats why you have a problem. If there was no design flaw then wtc7 could not have collapsed.

why not? bad things happen to buildings that are on fire----have had junk fall on
them and been subjected to a huge burst of energy right next door. You are damned optimistic -----you envision building IMMUNE from damage not matter
what the trauma

english your 4th language?

yeh think of all that energy its bombarded with from the sun.... got anything meaningful to post?

 

[KokomoJojo]

a plane was found at the pentagon! speaking of morons ,,

no plane was found what are you smokin? if you think there was lets see your 'plane'

If I recall correctly ----witnesses in the building saw a plane------right?

no one said there was not a plane..why do you keep repeating this

This silly question has been asked 8000 times. It did happen, there were reliable witnesses. It is best that you grow up.

but there is no reliable material evidence to back up your reliable witnesses.

 

[irosie91]

no its not------demo jobs show evidence of implosion

Hmm lets see if you got something there:

describe what evidence of implosion looks like.

something has to squish in-------it may not be apparent on a casual
glance while the event is ongoing---but should show up on exam of video and multi-views-----the squish-in is an EARLY part of the cave-in-----it initiates it.---
it is the big time energy event. -------the big time energy event in the
falling towers did not happen until they fell. They stood quietly burning
after the BAM AND FLASH of the plane-----so quietly that from my position
-------I was confident that everyone would get out------because very early on I
thought that the big time smoke was started by a piper cub that hit a wall----
nothing was shaken (that the first hit----and for the several minutes it took
to get to the second hit---_BIG TIME BANG AND FLASH/ Firm buildings
for more than half hour--------just spitting white smoke------sudden collapse then
BIG TIME ENERGY RELEASE at the base and the sky darkened

I didnt hear any physics or engineering in there anywhere, just a lot of parrot talk, want to try again?

even if you did you'd have no clue as to what it meant.

doesnt change the fact that rosie cant describe what an implosion looks like.

I described the dynamics of implostion beautifully and poetically----
------the force vector is "SQUISH-IN"

 

[daws101]

is that your best excuse for not watching it
btw I'm in the film biz and no cgi or camera tricks were used.
but you go ahead and be a fucking coward and not watch it ,,

Just because you wank on cam doesnt mean you know anything about film or cgi

false I know just about every thing about it you on the other hand think that by fucking with the contrast buttons on your tv makes you an expert..
still laughing about that one.

 

[KokomoJojo]

Hmm lets see if you got something there:

describe what evidence of implosion looks like.

something has to squish in-------it may not be apparent on a casual
glance while the event is ongoing---but should show up on exam of video and multi-views-----the squish-in is an EARLY part of the cave-in-----it initiates it.---
it is the big time energy event. -------the big time energy event in the
falling towers did not happen until they fell. They stood quietly burning
after the BAM AND FLASH of the plane-----so quietly that from my position
-------I was confident that everyone would get out------because very early on I
thought that the big time smoke was started by a piper cub that hit a wall----
nothing was shaken (that the first hit----and for the several minutes it took
to get to the second hit---_BIG TIME BANG AND FLASH/ Firm buildings
for more than half hour--------just spitting white smoke------sudden collapse then
BIG TIME ENERGY RELEASE at the base and the sky darkened

I didnt hear any physics or engineering in there anywhere, just a lot of parrot talk, want to try again?

even if you did you'd have no clue as to what it meant.

doesnt change the fact that rosie cant describe what an implosion looks like.

I described the dynamics of implostion beautifully and poetically----
------the force vector is "SQUISH-IN"

squish in is not a force vector OMG this is over the op screwball shit. Posing is not your strong suit.

 

[daws101]

that should read anyone suffering from delusions would think it was a demo job.

your evidence?

Non Sequitur

awe cant post evidence, guess you better go back to playing with your cam.

thanks for proudly proclaiming you have no fucking idea what a non sequitur is..

 

[irosie91]

is that your best excuse for not watching it
btw I'm in the film biz and no cgi or camera tricks were used.
but you go ahead and be a fucking coward and not watch it ,,

Just because you wank on cam doesnt mean you know anything about film or cgi

false I know just about every thing about it you on the other hand think that by fucking with the contrast buttons on your tv makes you an expert..
still laughing about that one.

I resent the use of technical lingo------(even the contrast button on the TV
baffles me <sob>) HOWEVER I do know that implosion,
technically is SQUISH IN.........

 

[KokomoJojo]

is that your best excuse for not watching it
btw I'm in the film biz and no cgi or camera tricks were used.
but you go ahead and be a fucking coward and not watch it ,,

Just because you wank on cam doesnt mean you know anything about film or cgi

false I know just about every thing about it you on the other hand think that by fucking with the contrast buttons on your tv makes you an expert..
still laughing about that one.

Sorry eots, cant resist showing everyone what a bunch of god damned fools these posers are:

OOPSIE!



some seriously fucked up cgi eh.... LMAO

Keep digging!