Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
name one steel framed hi-rise building that has suffered a complete collapse...other than the WTC buildings
ya who cares about the physics or molten metal..if it seems to hard to pull off..it must be the impossible NIST collapse story..lolThe thing that the Inside Job theorists can't explain is how and why.
We are just supposed to believe that a demolition team came into the buildings and rigged it to fall without anyone every knowing about it or seeing it done. Then we are supposed to believe that everyone on the demolition team has maintained complete silence on it.
I'm sorry, the official version is way more believable.
ya who cares about the physics or molten metal..if it seems to hard to pull off..it must be the impossible NIST collapse story..lolThe thing that the Inside Job theorists can't explain is how and why.
We are just supposed to believe that a demolition team came into the buildings and rigged it to fall without anyone every knowing about it or seeing it done. Then we are supposed to believe that everyone on the demolition team has maintained complete silence on it.
I'm sorry, the official version is way more believable.
name one steel framed hi-rise building that has suffered a complete collapse...other than the WTC buildings
that is a concrete building..not a steel framed hi- rise
name one steel framed hi-rise building that has suffered a complete collapse...other than the WTC buildings
that is a concrete building..not a steel framed hi- rise
As one can clearly see, the portion that collapsed was indeed steel framed. The portion left standing appears to be reinforced concrete. Bear in mind that all skyscrapers are made of both concrete and steel.
That building was only 5 stories high, and collapsed only because of poor construction. This is illustrative of how little needs to go wrong for a building to collapse.
It takes considerably more structural strength to hold up a 47 story building, and when it has been gashed by debris, and then gutted by a fire, there can be little surprise that it collapsed.
9 11 Conspiracy Theories - Debunking the Myths - World Trade Center
name one steel framed hi-rise building that has suffered a complete collapse...other than the WTC buildings
that is a concrete building..not a steel framed hi- rise
As one can clearly see from the beams in the wreckage, steel framing was used extensively in the collapsed portion. The portion left standing appears to be reinforced concrete. Bear in mind that all skyscrapers are made of both concrete and steel.
That building was only 5 stories high, and collapsed only because of poor construction. This is illustrative of how little needs to go wrong for a building to collapse.
It takes considerably more structural strength to hold up a 47 story building, and when it has been gashed by debris, and then gutted by a fire, there can be little surprise that it collapsed.
9 11 Conspiracy Theories - Debunking the Myths - World Trade Center
name one steel framed hi-rise building that has suffered a complete collapse...other than the WTC buildings
that is a concrete building..not a steel framed hi- rise
As one can clearly see from the beams in the wreckage, steel framing was used extensively in the collapsed portion. The portion left standing appears to be reinforced concrete. Bear in mind that all skyscrapers are made of both concrete and steel.
That building was only 5 stories high, and collapsed only because of poor construction. This is illustrative of how little needs to go wrong for a building to collapse.
It takes considerably more structural strength to hold up a 47 story building, and when it has been gashed by debris, and then gutted by a fire, there can be little surprise that it collapsed.
9 11 Conspiracy Theories - Debunking the Myths - World Trade Center
you are contradicting the NIST report again NIST determined damage from falling debris was not a factor in the collapse
name one steel framed hi-rise building that has suffered a complete collapse...other than the WTC buildings
that is a concrete building..not a steel framed hi- rise
As one can clearly see from the beams in the wreckage, steel framing was used extensively in the collapsed portion. The portion left standing appears to be reinforced concrete. Bear in mind that all skyscrapers are made of both concrete and steel.
That building was only 5 stories high, and collapsed only because of poor construction. This is illustrative of how little needs to go wrong for a building to collapse.
It takes considerably more structural strength to hold up a 47 story building, and when it has been gashed by debris, and then gutted by a fire, there can be little surprise that it collapsed.
9 11 Conspiracy Theories - Debunking the Myths - World Trade Center
.Cutting and pasting silly conspiracy theory drivel is pointless and time wasting.You are not capable..you prove it with every post..you can not support your position so you resort to inane comments..you loseI agree that your conspiracy theories are hardly the stuff of debate, clean or otherwise.clean debate zone..doubt you can handle itWhy are loons like you still furthering these silly conspiracy theories?
The link explains how it does. I guess you haven't read what you are replying to?office fires do not create a symmetrical collapses of steel framed hi-rise buildings at free fall speedNothing up my sleeve, presto!
GAITHERSBURG, Maryland -- The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has released its long-awaited report on the collapse of World Trade 7 following the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. "Our take-home message today is that the reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery," NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder told journalists at this morning's press conference in Gaithersburg, Md. "WTC 7 collapsed because of fires fueled by office furnishings. It did not collapse from explosives or from diesel fuel fires."
World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9 11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest
After 7 hours of uncontrolled fires, a steel girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to one of the 81 columns supporting the building. Floor 13 collapsed, beginning a cascade of floor failures to Floor 5. Column 79, no longer supported by a girder, buckled, triggering a rapid succession of structural failures that moved from east to west. All 23 central columns, followed by the exterior columns, failed in what's known as a "progressive collapse"--that is, local damage that spreads from one structural element to another, eventually resulting in the collapse of the entire structure.
The report clarifies a number of widely debated issues concerning the collapse, particularly the role of the building's many diesel fuel tanks and the importance of structural damage from falling WTC 1 debris. Both of those factors have been cited by investigators as possibly contributing to the collapse; the 2006 Popular Mechanics book Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts mentions both hypotheses. However, the final NIST report downplays both scenarios...
.... In fact, the report concludes: "Even without the structural damage, WTC 7 would have collapsed from fires."
The report determines that the actual culprit in the collapse was the combustion of ordinary building furnishings: "These uncontrolled fires had characteristics similar to those that have occurred previously in tall buildings." If the sprinkler system in WTC 7 had been working, it is likely that "the fires in WTC 7 would have been controlled and the collapse prevented." The report also suggests that current engineering standards for coping with fire-induced thermal expansion need to be re-examined, particularly for buildings like WTC 7 that have long, unsupported floor spans. A key factor in the collapse, NIST concluded, was the failure of structural "connections that were designed to resist gravity loads, but not thermally induced lateral loads." According to Sunder: "For the first time we have shown that fire can induce a progressive collapse."
World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9 11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest
The basic Truther argument seems to be that physics requires a conspiracy. If there was a conspiracy, it isn't obvious from the facts of the case. There are other more plausible explanations.
If you stop to think about the level of propaganda getting dished out to us, this really gets scary! There is that NOVA PBS program that was hijacked by the forces within NIST. And no credible responses by experts who know better - besides the signers of the A&E petition. Then there are the respected (I should say formerly respected) magazines like Scientific American, Mechanics Illustrated, Skeptical Enquirer, and others who refuse to recognize the impossible physics presented by the government.
The scary thing is that the Imperial Corporate forces have so much power over our media to do this.
Exposing this level of fraud from the powerful is slow, but it will be exposed. The truth can only be denied for so long. Experts on demolition always agree when they are shown the evidence.
it's what they do?What was the motive for the all powerful conspiracy to secretly sabotage this building?
none of the conspiracy makes any rational sense
name one steel framed hi-rise building that has suffered a complete collapse...other than the WTC buildings
that is a concrete building..not a steel framed hi- rise
As one can clearly see from the beams in the wreckage, steel framing was used extensively in the collapsed portion. The portion left standing appears to be reinforced concrete. Bear in mind that all skyscrapers are made of both concrete and steel.
That building was only 5 stories high, and collapsed only because of poor construction. This is illustrative of how little needs to go wrong for a building to collapse.
It takes considerably more structural strength to hold up a 47 story building, and when it has been gashed by debris, and then gutted by a fire, there can be little surprise that it collapsed.
9 11 Conspiracy Theories - Debunking the Myths - World Trade Center
you are contradicting the NIST report again NIST determined damage from falling debris was not a factor in the collapse
From the link:
"FACT: Many conspiracy theorists point to FEMA's preliminary report, which said there was relatively light damage to WTC 7 prior to its collapse. With the benefit of more time and resources, NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated. "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM. "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom—approximately 10 stories—about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner."
9 11 Conspiracy Theories - Debunking the Myths - World Trade Center