WWIII by the summer

[CrusaderFrank]

Germany approves long range missiles

What could possibly go wrong?

 

[1srelluc]

Dude looks high.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Germany approves long range missiles

What could possibly go wrong?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Let's... calm down just a bit, Frankie.

 

[Moonglow]

Don't we need to thin the population of Earth just a tad?

 

[rightwinger]

Who will Trump side with Ukraine or Putin?

 

[Moonglow]

Who will Trump side with Ukraine or Putin?

Trump isn't looking to build a Trump Tower in Ukraine.

 

[Moonglow]

The reason why Trump can't stop the war is Pootin would have to build a Trump golf course to end the war.

 

[Harry Dresden]

The reason why Trump can't stop the war is Pootin would have to build a Trump golf course to end the war.

wouldnt that be worth it to end that monstrosity?...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Don't we need to thin the population of Earth just a tad?

$lava Ukraine

 

[Moonglow]

wouldnt that be worth it to end that monstrosity?...

Everybody has to have a Trump golf course for a trade deal.

 

[Failzero]

Midsommar Civil unrest & Violence in ( The EU ) ( The UK ) ( Ireland ) ( Syria ) ( Lebanon ) …

 

[Ringo]

Europe who brought us WWI and WWII is determined in the age of nukes to start WWIII fighting Russia who has the largest nuclear arsenal and a leader they claim is evil and doesnt care about human life.
The US Govt isn't innocent, they wanted this proxy war and many still do.

The only thing we have going for us is that the European leaders really don't have the power to do anything without the US other than prolonging this, running their mouths, and getting more people killed in this loser of a war we're still in, that could have easily been prevented

 

[Ringo]

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Europe no longer has a population interested in preserving a nation as an institution.

 

[Old Rocks]

Germany approves long range missiles

What could possibly go wrong?

Much can go wrong for the Russian aggressors. And we should be putting in a division of Marines to counter the North Korean involvement. Russa starts WW3, they last about a month. They are getting their ass kicked by little Ukraine, just imagine the forces of NATO coming down on them. Nukes? Almost all of Russia's population is West of the Urals, so they have a rather small area to incinerate if it comes to that. They are bluffing, they know Russia would be forever gone if they use any nukes.

 

[Old Rocks]

Who will Trump side with Ukraine or Putin?

Thus far he has flapped yap like he supports Ukraine, but his actions have supported Russia.

 

[Zavulon]

Who will Trump side with Ukraine or Putin?

And what would you prefer?

Let's play the game. Cocaine Coalition (the UK, France, Germany, Poland and Ukraine), without American order or even permission, decided to escalate and join the war (including, if necessary, British and French nuclear weapons). They openly declared war to Russian Federation. Russia, as the first move, attacked British and French nuclear bases. It was pretty surgical and moderate strike - no civilian casualties, few thousands of British and French soldiers and sailors are dead. The bulk of their nuclear forces are destroyed. French and British governments gave the order to their survived SSBNs to attack Russian cities. British captain refused to execute obviously criminal order and asked for shelter in the USA. French captain attacked Saint Petersburg (for salvo of one SSBN can't penetrate Moscow ABD). Most of his warheads were intercepted, but few reached their target - thousands of Russian civilians are dead, hundreds of thousands lost their houses. Russians are, of course, pissed off, but retaliate quite moderately. Seven largest French cities (but not Paris) are totally destroyed and half of their inhabitants are dead or crippled.
Marseille: 850,636 inhabitants.
Lyon: 491,268 inhabitants.
Toulouse: 447,360 inhabitants.
Nice: 342,295 inhabitants.
Nantes: 292,718 inhabitants.
Strasbourg: 275,718 inhabitants.
Montpellier: 272,084 inhabitants.

German forces attacked American base and captured twenty B61-12 gravity bombs, now they are trying to hack them to be able to use as a terroristic weapons.

Now Russian Federation demands unconditional surrender of members of Cocaine Coalition and total denuclearisation of Western and Central Europe. Russian Federation isn't demonstrating clear signs of preparations to immediate attack against the USA, but they do evacuate state-esensial personel, they have their shelters prepared and Army - mobilised.


American government, who didn't believed in what is actually happening (and actively denied it) in the Europe now have the choice:

1. The USA can attack Russia unprepared. Highly likely it means death of 50% of American population.
2. The USA can ally Russia and attack members of Cocaine Coalition. It means that the USA regain control over at least half of Europe suffering little losses from invasion in Europe, and, say, 5% risk of one terroristic nuclear burst of German (former American) nuclear bomb in one American city.
3. The USA can stay neutral, and in this case the USA lose even formal control over Europe



So, if you were POTUS - what would you choose?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Much can go wrong for the Russian aggressors. And we should be putting in a division of Marines to counter the North Korean involvement. Russa starts WW3, they last about a month. They are getting their ass kicked by little Ukraine, just imagine the forces of NATO coming down on them. Nukes? Almost all of Russia's population is West of the Urals, so they have a rather small area to incinerate if it comes to that. They are bluffing, they know Russia would be forever gone if they use any nukes.

You want US Marines to maintain the Ukrainian Money Laundering Operation?

What happened to Kursk?

Putin and Trump have been very restrained thus far, may that continue

 

[rightwinger]

And what would you prefer?

Let's play the game. Cocaine Coalition (the UK, France, Germany, Poland and Ukraine), without American order or even permission, decided to escalate and join the war (including, if necessary, British and French nuclear weapons). They openly declared war to Russian Federation. Russia, as the first move, attacked British and French nuclear bases. It was pretty surgical and moderate strike - no civilian casualties, few thousands of British and French soldiers and sailors are dead. The bulk of their nuclear forces are destroyed. French and British governments gave the order to their survived SSBNs to attack Russian cities. British captain refused to execute obviously criminal order and asked for shelter in the USA. French captain attacked Saint Petersburg (for salvo of one SSBN can't penetrate Moscow ABD). Most of his warheads were intercepted, but few reached their target - thousands of Russian civilians are dead, hundreds of thousands lost their houses. Russians are, of course, pissed off, but retaliate quite moderately. Seven largest French cities (but not Paris) are totally destroyed and half of their inhabitants are dead or crippled.
Marseille: 850,636 inhabitants.
Lyon: 491,268 inhabitants.
Toulouse: 447,360 inhabitants.
Nice: 342,295 inhabitants.
Nantes: 292,718 inhabitants.
Strasbourg: 275,718 inhabitants.
Montpellier: 272,084 inhabitants.

German forces attacked American base and captured twenty B61-12 gravity bombs, now they are trying to hack them to be able to use as a terroristic weapons.

Now Russian Federation demands unconditional surrender of members of Cocaine Coalition and total denuclearisation of Western and Central Europe. Russian Federation isn't demonstrating clear signs of preparations to immediate attack against the USA, but they do evacuate state-esensial personel, they have their shelters prepared and Army - mobilised.


American government, who didn't believed in what is actually happening (and actively denied it) in the Europe now have the choice:

1. The USA can attack Russia unprepared. Highly likely it means death of 50% of American population.
2. The USA can ally Russia and attack members of Cocaine Coalition. It means that the USA regain control over at least half of Europe suffering little losses from invasion in Europe, and, say, 5% risk of one terroristic nuclear burst of German (former American) nuclear bomb in one American city.
3. The USA can stay neutral, and in this case the USA lose even formal control over Europe



So, if you were POTUS - what would you choose?

Threatening nuclear war?

Even Putin knows better