Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"almost all climate scientists have come to a general agreement". Care to prove that statement?
Irrational people do that. People who operate solely on emotion.No, dood. Your problem is we understand what's going on very well indeed.It seems Confounding believes an idea can only be true if most people believe it.
It seems that many of you get confused very easily.
You, however, have been told what to believe -- and you lack the wit to question your programming.
Agreed...I don't understand the mindset of someone who apologizes for a branch of science that can't produce any observed, measured evidence which supports their mainstream hypothesis over natural variability.
How do you support a branch of sceince that doesn't provide sufficient evidence for people who agree with them to support their position?
Your wishful thinking is not evidence."almost all climate scientists have come to a general agreement". Care to prove that statement?
Go to any place of science on Earth and start having conversations with real scientists. I'll tell you what I told SSDD. Please make sure it's on video when you start arguing with them about how science works. I wonder how many Youtube hits a video of you being laughed out of the room will get.
If the climate scientists had been following the scientific method there would have been no need for a whistle-blower.
It's not whistle-blowing. Scientists sometimes make mistakes and other scientists revise their work.
Yeah, now show me where consensus is described anywhere within the scientific method. GO!
It doesn't have to be. It's just a word that can be used when scientists are in general agreement about something. When somebody mentions the consensus they are simply saying that there is a general agreement among scientists when it comes to this issue.
you lack the wit to question your programming.
I bet you couldn't even read and comprehend work done by actual climate scientists.
you lack the wit to question your programming.
I bet you couldn't even read and comprehend work done by actual climate scientists.
Most of us skeptics have spent a great deal of time reviewing what passes for science in the field of climatology...it's why we are skeptics. Have the studies which found that skeptics have a better grasp of science than AGW believers escaped you?
Do you think you have a better understanding of science than climate scientists the world over?
Since when are "climate scientists" the end all? Much of what is involved in "climate science" is physics. Some how "climatologists" have overridden all other branches of science. People just believe.you lack the wit to question your programming.
I bet you couldn't even read and comprehend work done by actual climate scientists.
Most of us skeptics have spent a great deal of time reviewing what passes for science in the field of climatology...it's why we are skeptics. Have the studies which found that skeptics have a better grasp of science than AGW believers escaped you?
Do you think you have a better understanding of science than climate scientists the world over?
Had they been following the scientific method those "mistakes" would have been discovered quickly and properly. However, the scientific FRAUD that these people are engaging in requires whistleblowing because they are committing crimes. Crimes that they hide through PAL review.
You should look up the amount of sheer unethical behavior that these people have been CAUGHT doing. If you cared about science you would demand their hides.
How science works? I will continue the beautiful task of science, forever. And demand someone explain to me how anyone can believe that they can tell me the average temperature of planet Earth. I'm still waiting.Not one taker."almost all climate scientists have come to a general agreement". Care to prove that statement?
Go to any place of science on Earth and start having conversations with real scientists. I'll tell you what I told SSDD. Please make sure it's on video when you start arguing with them about how science works. I wonder how many Youtube hits a video of you being laughed out of the room will get.
Had they been following the scientific method those "mistakes" would have been discovered quickly and properly. However, the scientific FRAUD that these people are engaging in requires whistleblowing because they are committing crimes. Crimes that they hide through PAL review.
You should look up the amount of sheer unethical behavior that these people have been CAUGHT doing. If you cared about science you would demand their hides.
The honest scientists that find the mistakes made by these horrible lying criminals believe that AGW is happening too.
Yeah, now show me where consensus is described anywhere within the scientific method. GO!
It doesn't have to be. It's just a word that can be used when scientists are in general agreement about something. When somebody mentions the consensus they are simply saying that there is a general agreement among scientists when it comes to this issue.
For it to be SCIENCE it does. Where did you get your so called education again? Out of a cereal box?
Most of the "mistakes" are not discovered by the climate mafia. Just sayin...
Most of the "mistakes" are not discovered by the climate mafia. Just sayin...
Who are they found by and what is their stance on AGW?
Most often they are found by statisticians
Yes, anthro emissions "must" have an impact, is that the primary driver of climate or are there natural forces at work? If you can prove anything, we're waiting.Had they been following the scientific method those "mistakes" would have been discovered quickly and properly. However, the scientific FRAUD that these people are engaging in requires whistleblowing because they are committing crimes. Crimes that they hide through PAL review.
You should look up the amount of sheer unethical behavior that these people have been CAUGHT doing. If you cared about science you would demand their hides.
The honest scientists that find the mistakes made by these horrible lying criminals believe that AGW is happening too.
So yo, not confused, you going to post up that observed evidence? Or are you actually going to confirm you are confused?you lack the wit to question your programming.
I bet you couldn't even read and comprehend work done by actual climate scientists.
Most of us skeptics have spent a great deal of time reviewing what passes for science in the field of climatology...it's why we are skeptics. Have the studies which found that skeptics have a better grasp of science than AGW believers escaped you?
Do you think you have a better understanding of science than climate scientists the world over?
So yo, not confused, you going to post up that observed evidence? Or are you actually going to confirm you are confused?
It matters what they say! We breathe so we contribute CO2. Who wouldn’t agree with that? What you or they need to prove that we cause climate change. Now show us that evidence. GoHad they been following the scientific method those "mistakes" would have been discovered quickly and properly. However, the scientific FRAUD that these people are engaging in requires whistleblowing because they are committing crimes. Crimes that they hide through PAL review.
You should look up the amount of sheer unethical behavior that these people have been CAUGHT doing. If you cared about science you would demand their hides.
The honest scientists that find the mistakes made by these horrible lying criminals believe that AGW is happening too.
Just as I thought you backed out. You are truly confused, you don’t even expect evidence and have none. It must suck to be called out and you ain’t got anySo yo, not confused, you going to post up that observed evidence? Or are you actually going to confirm you are confused?
I'm not going to argue the science with a bunch of nobodies on a political forum. If you have an honest curiosity (you don't) go talk to a climate scientist that disagrees with you and has the patience to explain why you don't know what you're talking about.
