sameech
VIP Member
- May 12, 2014
- 1,605
- 297
- 80
Again you ignore the construction costs.................Which are causing the prices to go up already.
Would you rather we use nuclear which is so expensive that it makes no profit at all without taxpayer subsidies in the untold $zillions?
Would you rather burn coal, oil or natural gas in an exclusive power plant/water boiler or would you like a boiling system that runs off of free energy every day the sun shines or near a geothermal source 24/7 in tandem with existing carbon boilers?
You saying that constructing different ways of boiling water on the same real estate [co-generation] is "cost prohibitive" is the lame crying of a spoiled baby on the verge of having his pacifier taken away. The savings in 5 years time or less of free energy for most of the year would more than mitigate the costs of tacking on a solar thermal array onto any existing carbon boiler plant.. Free energy for most of the year, same fees charged = massive profit.
Why anyone is resisting this is either 1. Insanity or 2. Vested interest in coal, oil or uranium mining and refining.
The USS Lexington powered the city of Tacoma when a drought critically cut their hydroelectric generation.