SavannahMann
Platinum Member
- Nov 16, 2016
- 13,616
- 6,340
- 365
For this thread we have to go back. On February 6 of 2021 FBI agents moved in to serve a search warrant on David Huber who was suspected of Child Pornography. At six in the morning David Huber apparently opened fire and killed two agents and wounded three others.
He barricaded himself in his apartment and later took his own life. He reportedly died from a self inflicted gunshot wound.
At 9:30 in the morning USA Today put a news article online about the raid. This wasn’t unusual many news agencies were putting the story out about the same time.
Here it gets unusual. The FBI issued a Subpoena demanding the IP addresses of everyone who read the story from 8:03 PM to 8:38 PM. The Subpoena says this will provide information on an investigation.
Ok. What investigation? We know who killed the Agents. He’s dead. If he was dealing in Child Porn I could see a similar document to his Internet Provider for his web history. But a demand for all IP addresses who read the article during a thirty minute period fourteen hours after the event and some eleven hours after the story was posted seems. Odd.
Now. So far my narrative has been what is reported. What we know based upon the news stories. Now I am going to get into what I think/suspect with guesses instead of reports or facts. Prepare to flame me.
The only thing that makes sense to me is that the FBI monitored some communication where someone. Let’s call them X in classic mode, was referenced having just read the news. Perhaps it was a message board post for perverts where they said I just read where Dave likes your daughter was killed. Check it out on USA Today.
Since the FBI can’t subpoena internet records from a hell of a lot of places. They are casting the net over the one they can target.
Again. That is my guess. I could be very wrong about why they want the information. But we know they want the information. And we know that USA Today is fighting the Subpoena.
As for me, I am always suspicious of the FBI’s claims of Child Porn. Every time someone takes issue with their Civil Rights stomping actions the FBI screams Terrorists. And if that doesn’t do it they scream Child Porn!
He barricaded himself in his apartment and later took his own life. He reportedly died from a self inflicted gunshot wound.
At 9:30 in the morning USA Today put a news article online about the raid. This wasn’t unusual many news agencies were putting the story out about the same time.
Here it gets unusual. The FBI issued a Subpoena demanding the IP addresses of everyone who read the story from 8:03 PM to 8:38 PM. The Subpoena says this will provide information on an investigation.
USA Today fights subpoena aimed at readers of Florida FBI shooting story
Gannett, the publisher, contends that demand for details on who accessed article violates the First Amendment.
www.politico.com
Ok. What investigation? We know who killed the Agents. He’s dead. If he was dealing in Child Porn I could see a similar document to his Internet Provider for his web history. But a demand for all IP addresses who read the article during a thirty minute period fourteen hours after the event and some eleven hours after the story was posted seems. Odd.
Now. So far my narrative has been what is reported. What we know based upon the news stories. Now I am going to get into what I think/suspect with guesses instead of reports or facts. Prepare to flame me.
The only thing that makes sense to me is that the FBI monitored some communication where someone. Let’s call them X in classic mode, was referenced having just read the news. Perhaps it was a message board post for perverts where they said I just read where Dave likes your daughter was killed. Check it out on USA Today.
Since the FBI can’t subpoena internet records from a hell of a lot of places. They are casting the net over the one they can target.
Again. That is my guess. I could be very wrong about why they want the information. But we know they want the information. And we know that USA Today is fighting the Subpoena.
As for me, I am always suspicious of the FBI’s claims of Child Porn. Every time someone takes issue with their Civil Rights stomping actions the FBI screams Terrorists. And if that doesn’t do it they scream Child Porn!