Bragg's Case Against Trump - election interference - politically motivated? I have the answer.

[Procrustes Stretched]

It's probably a better analogy to say the jaywalking was done to enable more jaywalking, lol. The only "underlying crime" they are alleging is another misdemeanor...

Nope. If that were true there'd be no trial.

 

[para bellum]

Nope. If that were true there'd be no trial.

This is the underlying crime cited by the prosecution at the trial.​

​

Election Law Section 17-152​

Conspiracy to promote or prevent election​

Any two or more persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

N.Y. Election Law § 17-152 – Conspiracy to promote or prevent election

Any two or more persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful…

newyork.public.law

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

l


"Now we skip over to a predicate (underlying) crime? Revealed during trial. State law says no predicate crime has to be listed in any indictment."

That is a lie and you know it. There is no law that says that.

The actual law says the opposite, as I have previously shown. It is CPL 200.50 (7)(a) which states:

An indictment must contain:

7. A plain and concise factual statement in each count which, without
allegations of an evidentiary nature,

(a) asserts facts supporting every element of the offense charged and the defendant's or defendants' commission thereof with sufficient precision to clearly apprise the defendant or defendants of the conduct which is the subject of the accusation

Since one of the elements of PEN 175.10 is "and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof", CPL 200.50 requires that specificity in the indictment.

The reason Trump's legal tam is not arguing your nonsense here, is that your nonsense is patently nonsense.



quotes: ...when Bragg also suggested that tax violations may serve as a basis for this felony “bump-up.” His statement of facts declared that “The participants also took steps that mischaracterized, for tax purposes, the true nature of the payments made in furtherance of the scheme.”

Now that suggestion has been confirmed in his response on May 16 to Trump’s request for a bill of particulars: tax crimes are among the possible crimes Bragg will pursue as a predicate to bump up the charges against the former president.

statement of facts:

https://manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/2023-04-04-SOF.pdf

response: DocumentCloud

 

[Rambunctious]

I listed the crimes. You just ignoring it.

You didn't list a single crime... fallacious acts are not crimes... unsavory accusations are not crimes.... now go find a crime that Trump should be in court over....

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

This is the underlying crime cited by the prosecution at the trial.​

​

Election Law Section 17-152​

Conspiracy to promote or prevent election​

Any two or more persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

N.Y. Election Law § 17-152 – Conspiracy to promote or prevent election

Any two or more persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful…

newyork.public.law

Mr. Trump should fire his legal and hire you.

You have arguments his legal does not see, and it is not arguing. Truly amazing! You have to be a Stable Genius.

 

[Rambunctious]

read the indictment, it explains t all

I did.... its nothing but gibberish that any Trump hater could write... but its helping Trump in the polls so I'm okay with it....

 

[San Souci]

"Yet this case is not really about election interference, nor is it a politically motivated attempt to criminalize a benign personal deal. Boring as it may sound, it is a case about business integrity."

Opinion | I Was an Attorney at the D.A.’s Office. This Is What the Trump Case Is Really About.

Boring as it may sound, it is a case about business integrity.

web.archive.org

The author Rebecca Roiphe used to work in the office that is prosecuting Mr. Trump. Ms. Roiphe is a former assistant district attorney in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. More than anyone, she seems to have no dog in the fight over what this is really all about.

It is about the DNC keeping Trump from Campaigning. A Political Hit Job.

 

[San Souci]

Mr. Trump should fire his legal and hire you.

You have arguments his legal does not see, and it is not arguing. Truly amazing! You have to be a Stable Genius.

There was no crime ,Red.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

You didn't list a single crime... fallacious acts are not crimes... unsavory accusations are not crimes.... now go find a crime that Trump should be in court over....

Mr. Trump should fire his legal and also hire you, as well as that pardopium.

You both have arguments his legal does not see, and are not arguing. Truly amazing! You two have to be Stable Geniuses.

 

[Rambunctious]

Mr. Trump should fire his legal and hire you.

You have arguments his legal does not see, and it is not arguing. Truly amazing! You have to be a Stable Genius.

With this biased corrupt Trump hating Judge God himself couldn't defend Trump... this will have to be turned on appeal if this jury does the wrong thing and convicts Trump over a non crime...

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

It is about the DNC keeping Trump from Campaigning. A Political Hit Job.

A grand jury made up of loyal US citizens indicted Mr. Trump. THE DNC had nothing to do with any grand jury, or with any evidence presented to the loyal and patriotic US citizens on the grand jury.

Trump alone did it ll. He alone.

Trump Claims, 'I Alone'​

 

[San Souci]

A grand jury made up of loyal US citizens indicted Mr. Trump. THE DNC had nothing to do with any grand jury, or with any evidence presented to the loyal and patriotic US citizens on the grand jury.

Trump alone did it ll. He alone.

Trump Claims, 'I Alone'​

Sure. In Screw York City. He really had a chance. And NO Democrat is a Loyal American.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

There was no crime ,Red.

Mr Trump says that shit for public consumption for dolts like you.

Mr. Trump's lawyers do not say there are no crimes. They are arguing that he is innocent of crimes, not that there are no crimes.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

With this biased corrupt Trump hating Judge God himself couldn't defend Trump... this will have to be turned on appeal if this jury does the wrong thing and convicts Trump over a non crime...

The judge did not indict Mr. Trump. The DNC did not indict Mr. Trump. President Biden did not indict Mr. Trump.

A grand jury made up or loyal and patriotic US citizens indeicted Mr. Trump

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

With this biased corrupt Trump hating Judge God himself couldn't defend Trump... this will have to be turned on appeal if this jury does the wrong thing and convicts Trump over a non crime...

A guilty verdict by a jury must be respected. Even people who believed OJ was a murderer had to respect the jury's verdict.

It's what makes America great.

It's how America works.

 

[San Souci]

Mr Trump says that shit for public consumption for dolts like you.

Mr. Trump's lawyers do not say there are no crimes. They are arguing that he is innocent of crimes, not that there are no crimes.

Stretching a defunct Misdemeanor into 34 Felonies? That is Prosecutorial Misconduct. Ever heard of Statute of Limitations?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

I did.... its nothing but gibberish that any Trump hater could write... but its helping Trump in the polls so I'm okay with it....

Here's another horse race poll to whack off over

MSN

 

[San Souci]

A guilty verdict by a jury must be respected. Even people who believed OJ was a murderer had to respect the jury's verdict.

It's what makes America great.

It's how America works.

Great? It ain't great with Dems in charge. Trying to put the opposition in Jail is Stalinist. Not surprising for Democruds ,however.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Stretching a defunct Misdemeanor into 34 Felonies? That is Prosecutorial Misconduct. Ever heard of Statute of Limitations?

Only the jury matters, and they will not be listening to your regurgitation of MAGA talking points.

 

[San Souci]

Only the jury matters, and they will not be listening to your regurgitation of MAGA talking points.

Got my answer. You DON"T know.